EFL League TwoWham Stadium, Accrington13°21,6 mm20 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Accrington StanleyAccrington StanleyLow block & direct
    vs
    Cheltenham TownCheltenham TownLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Accrington Stanley (41%)

    Accrington Stanley vs Cheltenham Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Accrington Stanley 41%X 29%30% Cheltenham Town · 2

    Bet on this match

    BetssonFå ett 250 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4!Claim the bonus at Betsson
    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Accrington Stanley – Cheltenham Town

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Cheltenham Town arrive with a five-match unbeaten streak, yet the model leans towards Accrington Stanley at 41%. Despite Cheltenham's better points tally, the hosts have the edge in xPoints at 8.8 compared to 8.1. The expected goals further underline Accrington's potential, with an xG per match of 1.6 against Cheltenham's 1.1. This suggests a tighter contest than the points table might suggest.

    Both teams play with a similar low defence, direct style, which could lead to a scrappy affair. Accrington's defensive frailties are apparent in their xGA of 1.8 per match, compared to the visitors' 1.5. This defensive vulnerability might explain why both teams to score has a 54% probability. Although Cheltenham have found the net in eight consecutive matches, their scoring potency doesn't fully match Accrington’s attacking potential.

    With a predicted 1-1 scoreline at 13% and an over 2.5 goals likelihood sitting evenly at 50%, this clash is finely balanced. The sharpest angle lies in backing a 1-1 draw, yet for value seekers, exploring the home win at 41% probability could be tempting, especially if a bookmaker like Bet365 offers favorable odds, currently standing at 2.4.

    Accrington StanleyAccrington Stanley
    Form LDWLD
    League ranking xG #7xGA #23xT #8xP/match #10Points #22
    Key players
    • Donald LoveRWxG 0.03 · xT 0.30
    • Charlie CatonFxG 0.57 · xT 0.04
    • Josh Stanley Ronald WoodsFxG 0.45 · xT 0.08
    Cheltenham TownCheltenham Town
    Form DWDWD
    League ranking xG #20xGA #18xT #19xP/match #14Points #5
    Key players
    • Charlie Liam McCannCAMxG 0.33 · xT 0.13
    • Ryan BroomRWxG 0.11 · xT 0.04
    • Robbie David CundyCBxG 0.07 · xT 0.03

    Match prediction: Accrington Stanley – Cheltenham Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Cheltenham Town →
    Accrington Stanley →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.3%
    0–18.0%
    0–25.0%
    0–32.0%
    0–4+0.8%
    1
    1–09.9%
    1–112.6%
    1–27.3%
    1–32.9%
    1–4+1.1%
    2
    2–07.5%
    2–19.0%
    2–25.4%
    2–32.1%
    2–4+0.8%
    3
    3–03.7%
    3–14.4%
    3–22.6%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.9%
    4+–12.2%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.0-18%
    5. 5.2-07%
    Expected goals
    1,47–1,20
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    –
    Over 2,550%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Accrington Stanley or draw (1X)69%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    50%

    Fair odds

    2.00

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Accrington Stanley or draw (1X)69%
    • Under 2.5 goals50%
    • Charlie George Caton to score25%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Charlie George Caton to score25%
    • Ben Edward Stevenson to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Accrington Stanley 1Draw 1Cheltenham Town 2
    Goals: 4–4 (⌀ 2)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Cheltenham Town are unbeaten in their last 5 league matches.
    • Cheltenham Town have scored in 8 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Accrington Stanley
    Cheltenham Town
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Accrington Stanley (10–13)
    Cheltenham Town (14–11)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Accrington Stanley
    Joseph William Anderson: 148 passningar, xT 0.94AndersonLiam Coyle: 112 passningar, xT 0.18CoyleDonald Love: 110 passningar, xT 1.16LoveDavid Mabanga Tutonda: 84 passningar, xT 0.04TutondaLouie Moulden: 83 passningar, xT 0.23MouldenDevon Matthews: 67 passningar, xT 0.41MatthewsSeamus Conneely: 66 passningar, xT 0.05ConneelyJosh Stanley Ronald Woods: 52 passningar, xT 0.5WoodsFarrend Rawson: 38 passningar, xT 0.05RawsonShaun Whalley: 36 passningar, xT 0.2WhalleyStefan Edouard Mols: 34 passningar, xT 0.06Mols
    Cheltenham Town
    Robbie David Cundy: 173 passningar, xT 0.15CundyJoseph William George Tomlinson: 146 passningar, xT 0.43TomlinsonJonathan Robert Tomkinson: 139 passningar, xT 0.21TomkinsonPierce Liam Sweeney: 125 passningar, xT 0.09SweeneyWylliam Sam Stanway: 123 passningar, xT 0.1StanwayShaun Daniel McWilliams: 113 passningar, xT 0.12McWilliamsBen Edward Stevenson: 93 passningar, xT 0.04StevensonCharlie Liam McCann: 81 passningar, xT 0.34McCannJake Evans: 63 passningar, xT -0.03EvansJordan Mark Edward James Shipley: 61 passningar, xT 0.39ShipleyJames Steven Wilson: 60 passningar, xT 0.12Wilson
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Accrington Stanley
    Joseph William Anderson: 148 passningar, xT 0.94AndersonLiam Coyle: 112 passningar, xT 0.18CoyleDonald Love: 110 passningar, xT 1.16LoveDavid Mabanga Tutonda: 84 passningar, xT 0.04TutondaLouie Moulden: 83 passningar, xT 0.23MouldenDevon Matthews: 67 passningar, xT 0.41MatthewsSeamus Conneely: 66 passningar, xT 0.05ConneelyJosh Stanley Ronald Woods: 52 passningar, xT 0.5WoodsFarrend Rawson: 38 passningar, xT 0.05RawsonShaun Whalley: 36 passningar, xT 0.2WhalleyStefan Edouard Mols: 34 passningar, xT 0.06Mols
    Cheltenham Town
    Robbie David Cundy: 173 passningar, xT 0.15CundyJoseph William George Tomlinson: 146 passningar, xT 0.43TomlinsonJonathan Robert Tomkinson: 139 passningar, xT 0.21TomkinsonPierce Liam Sweeney: 125 passningar, xT 0.09SweeneyWylliam Sam Stanway: 123 passningar, xT 0.1StanwayShaun Daniel McWilliams: 113 passningar, xT 0.12McWilliamsBen Edward Stevenson: 93 passningar, xT 0.04StevensonCharlie Liam McCann: 81 passningar, xT 0.34McCannJake Evans: 63 passningar, xT -0.03EvansJordan Mark Edward James Shipley: 61 passningar, xT 0.39ShipleyJames Steven Wilson: 60 passningar, xT 0.12Wilson

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceAccrington StanleyCheltenham Town
    Points511
    xPoints8.88.1
    xG per match1.61.1
    xGA per match1.81.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.530.28
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.450.15
    Playing styleAccrington StanleyCheltenham Town
    Build-up efficiency0.320.33
    Field tilt0.430.35
    xT per match0.970.66
    xTA per match1.21.1
    Won balls, offensive half2823
    Pressing intensity0.230.22
    Pressing efficiency0.390.32
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.330.31
    Entries into the box per match128
    Entries into the box against1315
    Pass completion %0.590.62
    Pass completion % under pressure0.560.59
    Passes per match204245
    Passes against per match270353
    Switches of play per match18.914.4
    Long balls per match3225
    Set piecesAccrington StanleyCheltenham Town
    xG from free kicks0.070
    Corners per match3.44
    Corners against per match5.66
    xG per corner0.010.01
    xGA per corner against0.020.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330.42
    First touch, defensive corners %0.740.61
    OtherAccrington StanleyCheltenham Town
    Throw-in control0.670.67
    The goalkeepersLouie Moulden (Accrington Stanley)Wylliam Sam Stanway (Cheltenham Town)
    Saves2515
    Save %69%58%
    xG prevented52%30%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Accrington Stanley vs Cheltenham Town according to our model?

    The model gives Accrington Stanley a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Accrington Stanley 41%, draw 29%, Cheltenham Town 30%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.