01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Fleetwood Town or draw (X2)71%
- Under 3.5 goals73%
EFL League TwoWhaddon Road, Cheltenham11°17,1 mm14 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 4–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Cheltenham Town vs Fleetwood Town (EFL League Two, Tuesday, 20 October 2026): Cheltenham Town win 28%, draw 29%, Fleetwood Town win 43%. Expected goals (xG): Cheltenham Town 1.15, Fleetwood Town 1.49. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 49%, both teams to score 53%. Double chance: Cheltenham Town or draw 57%, Fleetwood Town or draw 72%. Prediction updated Monday, 12 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Cheltenham Town's recent form paints a grim picture as they head into the clash against Fleetwood Town, having dropped their last three games. Despite their struggles, they hold a slender points advantage over Fleetwood, underscoring the competitive balance of this encounter. However, the model's probabilities clearly tilt in favor of the visitors, who are given a 43% chance of winning compared to Cheltenham's 28%.
Fleetwood's edge comes from their ability to exploit counterattacks and utilize crosses effectively, posing a significant threat to Cheltenham's vulnerable defense. The expected goals tally further highlights this, with Fleetwood projected at 1.49 xG compared to Cheltenham's 1.15. These numbers suggest that the visitors are more likely to find the back of the net.
The head-to-head record between these sides since 2023, though limited to just four games, shows a slight advantage for Fleetwood with two wins to Cheltenham's one. This small sample size is less telling than the current form and expected goals data, but it serves as a minor confidence booster for the visitors.
Weather conditions, with over 9mm of rain, could dampen the attacking play, aligning with the model's lean towards a lower-scoring affair. Both teams to score is rated at 53%, but the rain and Cheltenham's low defensive profile might suppress their offensive output.
The sharpest angle here lies in the market's oversight on goal totals. Under 2.5 goals offers value with a 1% edge at odds of 1.98 through Betsafe and Nordicbet. Given the weather and playing styles, this represents a sensible play. Moreover, considering the forecast and both teams' recent performances, a 1-1 draw or perhaps a narrow 0-1 victory for Fleetwood seems the most plausible outcome.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cheltenham Town | X | 2 · Fleetwood Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.15 | 3.30 | 2.15 |
| LeoVegas | 3.05 | 3.35 | 2.20 |
| Nordicbet | 3.15 | 3.30 | 2.15 |
| Pinnacle | 3.20 | EV+ 1% 3.45 | 2.24 |
Odds updated 20 Oct, 11:36
2.92 → 3.20
3.34 → 3.45
2.37 → 2.24
1.80 → 1.87
Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 18/10/2026 → 20/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cheltenham Town | Fleetwood Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 15 | 14 |
| xPoints | 13.7 | 13.2 |
| xG per match | 0.99 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.27 | 0.12 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.14 |
| Playing style | Cheltenham Town | Fleetwood Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.35 | 0.52 |
| xT per match | 0.52 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.91 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.37 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.39 |
| Entries into the box per match | 7 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| Passes per match | 284 | 270 |
| Passes against per match | 351 | 265 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.9 | 16.7 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Cheltenham Town | Fleetwood Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| Corners against per match | 6 | 5.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.36 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| Other | Cheltenham Town | Fleetwood Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Wylliam Sam Stanway (Cheltenham Town) | Jay Lynch (Fleetwood Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 31 | 23 |
| Save % | 62% | 68% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 40% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Fleetwood Town a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cheltenham Town 28%, draw 29%, Fleetwood Town 43%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The model expects 1.15 goals (xG) for Cheltenham Town and 1.49 for Fleetwood Town, 2.63 in total.
Cheltenham Town or draw (1X) 57%, Fleetwood Town or draw (X2) 72% and no draw (12) 71%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.