EFL League TwoPriestfield Stadium, Gillingham13°2,7 mm14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    GillinghamGillinghamCounter-attacks & crosses
    1–1
    Port ValePort ValeLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 2 · Port Vale (41%)Best value by the model: X · Draw @ 3.35 (+16 %)

    Gillingham vs Port Vale · EFL League Two

    1 · Gillingham 24%X 35%41% Port Vale · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 1–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Gillingham vs Port Vale (EFL League Two, Tuesday, 20 October 2026): Gillingham win 24%, draw 35%, Port Vale win 41%. Expected goals (xG): Gillingham 1.03, Port Vale 1.34. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 42%, both teams to score 48%. Double chance: Gillingham or draw 59%, Port Vale or draw 76%. Prediction updated Monday, 12 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Gillingham – Port Vale

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    Two past meetings and two wins for Gillingham — on paper, this might suggest a psychological edge for the hosts against Port Vale. However, the sample is too small to override the complexity of the current dynamics. The model forecasts favour Port Vale with a 41% chance of winning, while Gillingham's probability lags behind at 24%. These numbers suggest that the visitors have a slight upper hand, despite recent history.

    The playing styles of these teams set up a battle of contrasting tactics. Gillingham's counter-attacking and crossing strategy will meet Port Vale's low block and direct approach. Tactically, this puts pressure on the hosts to be precise and clinical when opportunities arise. Meanwhile, the visitors will likely focus on maintaining their defensive solidity, where they excel with an xGA of just 0.94 per match compared to Gillingham's 1.4. In a setting where defensive organization might reign supreme, the likelihood of a low-scoring encounter looms large.

    Expected goals also paint an intriguing picture. Both sides are expected to stay around the 1.1 mark, with Port Vale slightly edging out Gillingham at 1.34 to 1.03. The forecasted scorelines, like the 1-1 draw at 13% and 0-1 win for Port Vale at 12%, underscore the cautious nature of this matchup, further diluted by the expected rain that could suppress goal-scoring opportunities.

    From a betting perspective, the draw emerges as a sharp angle, especially given its overlay in the market. With a 35% probability against offered odds of 3.3 (LeoVegas) or 3.2 (Betsafe and Nordicbet), the draw stands out as the value bet. A 1-1 stalemate looks promising, aligning with both the mathematical model and the tactical narrative of this clash.

    GillinghamGillingham
    Form WLDWL
    League ranking xG #20xGA #15xT #19xP/match #14Points #6
    Key players
    • Omar Jerome BecklesCBxG 0.10 · xT 0.03
    • James Robert BrophyLWxG 0.09 · xT 0.08
    • Ronan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman HaleLWxG 0.26 · xT 0.00
    Port ValePort Vale
    Form LWLWW
    League ranking xG #18xGA #1xT #13xP/match #9Points #21
    Key players
    • Cameron HumphreysCBxG 0.02 · xT 0.05
    • Jordan Lawrence GabrielRWBxG 0.05 · xT 0.12
    • Kyle Michael DempseyCMxG 0.06 · xT 0.05
    Final score
    1 – 1
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Gillingham 24% · Draw 35% · Port Vale 41%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - Port ValeBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 9,34fair 11,37-18 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - GillinghamBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 13,46fair 18,87-29 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Gillingham – Port Vale

    Predicted score matrix

    Port Vale →
    Gillingham →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.7%
    0–112.1%
    0–28.4%
    0–33.7%
    0–4+1.7%
    1
    1–09.2%
    1–113.3%
    1–28.6%
    1–33.9%
    1–4+1.7%
    2
    2–05.0%
    2–16.7%
    2–24.5%
    2–32.0%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–01.7%
    3–12.3%
    3–21.5%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–00.6%
    4+–10.7%
    4+–20.5%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-112%
    3. 3.0-010%
    4. 4.1-09%
    5. 5.1-29%
    Expected goals
    1,03–1,34
    Both teams to score
    48%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,558%
    @1.69
    Over 2,542%
    @2.20

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Port Vale or draw (X2)72%
    • Under 3.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    56%

    Fair odds

    1.79

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Port Vale or draw (X2)72%
    • Under 2.5 goals58%
    • Benjamin Peter Waine to score19%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score48%
    • Over 2.5 goals42%
    • Benjamin Peter Waine to score19%
    • Kyle Michael Dempsey to be booked18%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • X · Draw35% probability@3.35PinnacleEV+16%reference odds
    • X · Draw35% probability@3.15BetsafeEV+9%reference odds
    • X · Draw35% probability@3.15LeoVegasEV+9%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · GillinghamX2 · Port Vale
    Betsafe3.20
    EV+ 9%
    3.15
    2.22
    LeoVegas3.15
    EV+ 9%
    3.15
    2.25
    Nordicbet3.20
    EV+ 9%
    3.15
    2.22
    Pinnacle3.25
    EV+ 16%
    3.35
    2.26

    Odds updated 20 Oct, 13:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards under 2.5 goals since 18 October — the odds have shortened from 1.78 to 1.69 (−5%).

    1+14 %
    34 %29 %

    2.86 → 3.25

    X0 %
    31 %26 %

    3.35 → 3.35

    2-6 %
    43 %38 %

    2.41 → 2.26

    Over 2,5+9 %
    48 %43 %

    2.02 → 2.20

    Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 18/10/2026 → 20/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Gillingham 2Draw 0Port Vale 0
    Goals: 2–0 (⌀ 1)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Gillingham
    Port Vale
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Gillingham (16–13)
    Port Vale (5–9)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 195 passningar, xT 0.16BecklesOliver Lennon George Wright: 147 passningar, xT 0.22WrightJames Robert Brophy: 143 passningar, xT 0.27BrophyLogan Dobbs: 143 passningar, xT 0.16DobbsNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 134 passningar, xT 0.73FreemanAndy Smith: 125 passningar, xT 0.11SmithRobbie Mckenzie: 96 passningar, xT 0.04MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 62 passningar, xT -0.1HaleGarath James McCleary: 43 passningar, xT 0.03McClearyHarry Waldock: 39 passningar, xT 0.29WaldockArmani Little: 37 passningar, xT -0.01Little
    Port Vale
    Connor Hall: 132 passningar, xT 0.21HallJaheim Anthony Headley: 127 passningar, xT 0.35HeadleyKyle Michael Dempsey: 110 passningar, xT 0.13DempseyBenjamin Matthew Garrity: 90 passningar, xT 0.36GarrityJordan Lawrence Gabriel: 83 passningar, xT 0.43GabrielKyle Alex John: 76 passningar, xT 0.21JohnCameron Humphreys: 62 passningar, xT 0.13HumphreysGeorge William Byers: 62 passningar, xT 0.07ByersLewis Lee Montsma: 60 passningar, xT 0.05MontsmaJasper Moon: 48 passningar, xT 0.07MoonMarko Maroši: 44 passningar, xT 0.15Maroši
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 195 passningar, xT 0.16BecklesOliver Lennon George Wright: 147 passningar, xT 0.22WrightJames Robert Brophy: 143 passningar, xT 0.27BrophyLogan Dobbs: 143 passningar, xT 0.16DobbsNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 134 passningar, xT 0.73FreemanAndy Smith: 125 passningar, xT 0.11SmithRobbie Mckenzie: 96 passningar, xT 0.04MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 62 passningar, xT -0.1HaleGarath James McCleary: 43 passningar, xT 0.03McClearyHarry Waldock: 39 passningar, xT 0.29WaldockArmani Little: 37 passningar, xT -0.01Little
    Port Vale
    Connor Hall: 132 passningar, xT 0.21HallJaheim Anthony Headley: 127 passningar, xT 0.35HeadleyKyle Michael Dempsey: 110 passningar, xT 0.13DempseyBenjamin Matthew Garrity: 90 passningar, xT 0.36GarrityJordan Lawrence Gabriel: 83 passningar, xT 0.43GabrielKyle Alex John: 76 passningar, xT 0.21JohnCameron Humphreys: 62 passningar, xT 0.13HumphreysGeorge William Byers: 62 passningar, xT 0.07ByersLewis Lee Montsma: 60 passningar, xT 0.05MontsmaJasper Moon: 48 passningar, xT 0.07MoonMarko Maroši: 44 passningar, xT 0.15Maroši

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceGillinghamPort Vale
    Points1611
    xPoints14.612.7
    xG per match1.11.1
    xGA per match1.40.94
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.290.19
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.240.35
    Playing styleGillinghamPort Vale
    Build-up efficiency0.330.32
    Field tilt0.390.48
    xT per match0.690.87
    xTA per match0.920.5
    Won balls, offensive half2228
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.340.35
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.330.35
    Entries into the box per match710
    Entries into the box against1310
    Pass completion %0.640.63
    Pass completion % under pressure0.580.61
    Passes per match247246
    Passes against per match315275
    Switches of play per match18.618.4
    Long balls per match3128
    Set piecesGillinghamPort Vale
    xG from free kicks0.060.08
    Corners per match3.24.6
    Corners against per match5.65.1
    xG per corner0.020.01
    xGA per corner against0.030.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.40.41
    First touch, defensive corners %0.610.7
    OtherGillinghamPort Vale
    Throw-in control0.750.75
    The goalkeepersOliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham)Jackson William Smith (Port Vale)
    Saves3110
    Save %82%59%
    xG prevented75%36%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Gillingham vs Port Vale according to our model?

    The model gives Port Vale a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gillingham 24%, draw 35%, Port Vale 41%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 42% and under at 58%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Gillingham vs Port Vale?

    The model expects 1.03 goals (xG) for Gillingham and 1.34 for Port Vale, 2.37 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Gillingham or draw (1X) 59%, Port Vale or draw (X2) 76% and no draw (12) 65%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.