01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Chesterfield to win50%
- Under 3.5 goals80%
EFL League TwoNew York Stadium, Rotherham17°8,2 mm16 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Chesterfield embarks on this fixture against Rotherham United with the wind in their sails, a team that has demonstrated a sharp attacking edge in recent outings. Their xG of 1.9 per match eclipses Rotherham's 1.2, emphasizing a potent offensive machine that the hosts will struggle to contain. Despite both teams focusing on possession control, Chesterfield's execution in front of goal has been superior, supported by their marginally tighter defense with an xGA of 0.91 compared to Rotherham's 1.0.
The model highlights Chesterfield as the favorite with a 50% win probability, and there’s good reason to trust this assessment. The most likely outcomes—1-1 and 0-1—both signal Chesterfield's ability to at least secure a point, if not all three. The visitors have managed to translate their superior xPoints of 4.1 into actual results more effectively than Rotherham, who falter with just 1 point at hand.
Given the small head-to-head sample since 2023, the historical record should not weigh heavily on our expectations. More telling is Chesterfield's trajectory in the current season, reflected in their three points from matches so far. The expected goals tally reinforces the notion of a low-scoring contest, with a 41% probability for over 2.5 goals and both teams scoring a mere 46% chance.
Chesterfield’s odds of 2.32 for an away win represent an enticing prospect for value hunters, especially highlighted by Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. The model's 17% edge suggests a keen opportunity to back an away triumph. While a 0-1 scoreline seems plausible, the allure of Chesterfield at these odds is the sharper angle. Expect them to leverage their attacking efficiency and defensive stability to edge out a determined, but ultimately overmatched, Rotherham side.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Rotherham United | X | 2 · Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.25 | 3.30 | EV+ 7% 2.12 |
| Betsson | 3.25 | 3.30 | EV+ 7% 2.12 |
| Nordicbet | 3.25 | 3.30 | EV+ 7% 2.12 |
| Pinnacle | 2.93 | 3.48 | EV+ 20% 2.38 |
Odds updated 29 Aug, 11:37
2.99 → 2.93
3.54 → 3.48
2.23 → 2.38
1.93 → 1.98
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 29/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Rotherham United | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 3 |
| xPoints | 2.9 | 4.1 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 0.91 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.06 | 0.83 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| Playing style | Rotherham United | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.55 |
| xT per match | 0.86 | 0.64 |
| xTA per match | 0.87 | 0.9 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.41 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.39 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.65 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 287 | 344 |
| Passes against per match | 283 | 335 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.4 | 34.7 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 42 |
| Set pieces | Rotherham United | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 3 |
| Corners against per match | 7 | 3 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.22 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.71 | 0.83 |
| Other | Rotherham United | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Lenny Agbaire (Rotherham United) | Ryan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 9 |
| Save % | 100% | 90% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 98% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Chesterfield a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Rotherham United 26%, draw 23%, Chesterfield 50%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 41% and under at 59%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 46% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.