01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Gillingham or draw (1X)71%
- Under 3.5 goals74%
EFL League TwoPriestfield Stadium, Gillingham19°3,5 mm29 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Northampton Town's approach in possession seems finely tuned, which is evident in their superior expected goals against (xGA) of 0.52 compared to Gillingham's 2.0 per match. This underlines a defensive solidity that could stifle the hosts' counter-attacking and crossing game. Yet, it's worth noting the model's lean towards the Gills, despite the visitors' stronger xPoints and xGA metrics.
Rain at Priestfield Stadium may level the playing field, likely suppressing the goal tally—which aligns with the model's 48% probability for over 2.5 goals. The most probable scenarios suggest a low-scoring affair, with a 1-1 draw slightly favored at 13%, followed by a narrow 1-0 win for Gillingham at 11%. Both teams to score hovers at 52%, hinting at a cautious exchange.
Gillingham's strategy thrives on counter opportunities and whipping in crosses. However, with an xG of just 1.0 per match, they face the challenge of breaking down a Northampton side that controls possession effectively. The visitors' ability to create chances within eight seconds of winning the ball, demonstrated by their 0.39 xG in such scenarios, could be pivotal if they catch Gillingham on the back foot.
While Northampton seem the more robust outfit statistically, the model sees value in backing the hosts at odds of 2.52 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. The 4% edge indicates potential profit in a home win, despite the visitors' apparent strengths in xG metrics. In a tightly contested match, leveraging these favorable odds could be the wisest route for punters looking to capitalize on Gillingham's slight edge.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Gillingham | X | 2 · Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 9% 2.65 | 3.15 | 2.45 |
| Betsson | EV+ 9% 2.65 | 3.15 | 2.45 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 9% 2.65 | 3.15 | 2.45 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 12% 2.72 | 3.26 | 2.68 |
Odds updated 29 Aug, 11:37
2.83 → 2.72
3.28 → 3.26
2.47 → 2.68
1.99 → 2.05
Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 29/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Gillingham | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| xPoints | 2.2 | 3.4 |
| xG per match | 1 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 2 | 0.52 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0 | 0.39 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Gillingham | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.37 | 0.5 |
| xT per match | 0.89 | 0.63 |
| xTA per match | 0.88 | 0.47 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.58 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.57 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 184 | 335 |
| Passes against per match | 319 | 309 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.7 | 20.9 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Gillingham | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.17 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.9 | 8.1 |
| Corners against per match | 9.3 | 4.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.38 | 0.56 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.5 |
| Other | Gillingham | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Robbie Mckenzie (Gillingham) | Zachary Anton John Jeacock (Northampton Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3 | 2 |
| Save % | 100% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 17% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Gillingham a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gillingham 41%, draw 28%, Northampton Town 30%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.