01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Leeds United or draw (1X)71%
- Under 3.5 goals76%
Premier LeagueElland Road, Leeds14°0,1 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Leeds United enters this matchup with a slight statistical edge over Crystal Palace, both in terms of form and expected goals. The home side's balanced and physical style contrasts with the visitors' low-defence, direct approach. Leeds has secured 8 points to Palace's 3 in their recent performances, a pattern that aligns with their superior expected points (xPoints) tally of 6.6 to 2.9. The model favors Leeds, predicting a 42% chance for a home win, compared to just 28% for the visitors.
The expected goals (xG) figures further illuminate Leeds' advantage, with the hosts generating 1.6 xG per match against Palace's 0.86, while also managing to keep their expected goals against (xGA) lower at 1.5 compared to Palace's 2.3. This suggests Leeds could edge out a narrow victory. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 and 1-0, alongside a less than even probability for over 2.5 goals (45%), indicate a tense, low-scoring affair.
Historically, albeit from a small sample of two matches since 2022, Leeds has not lost to Palace, with one win and one draw. While head-to-heads offer limited insight due to the small sample size, they do reinforce the current form trends. Both teams to score is an even proposition at 50%, hinting at a balanced battle but not one laden with goals.
Despite the lean towards Leeds, there’s significant value in backing Palace at odds of 4.5 with bookmakers like Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, as the model gives them a 28% chance of victory, a 26% edge over the market's implied probability. This presents a compelling option for value seekers willing to bet against the grain, even though the analytical lean favors a narrow win for the hosts.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Leeds United | X | 2 · Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.00 | EV+ 4% 3.50 | 3.50 |
| Betsafe | 1.78 | EV+ 10% 3.70 | EV+ 26% 4.50 |
| Betsson | 1.79 | EV+ 11% 3.71 | EV+ 26% 4.50 |
| Nordicbet | 1.78 | EV+ 10% 3.70 | EV+ 26% 4.50 |
| Pinnacle | 1.78 | EV+ 14% 3.83 | EV+ 29% 4.60 |
Odds updated 18 Sept, 05:10
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Leeds United win since 13 September — the odds have shortened from 1.96 to 1.78 (−9%).
1.96 → 1.78
3.49 → 3.83
3.83 → 4.60
1.85 → 1.76
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 13/09/2026 → 18/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Leeds United | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 8 | 3 |
| xPoints | 6.6 | 2.9 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 0.86 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 2.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.34 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.73 |
| Playing style | Leeds United | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| xT per match | 0.88 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 0.96 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 34 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.18 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 270 | 334 |
| Passes against per match | 375 | 496 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.8 | 15.3 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 21 |
| Set pieces | Leeds United | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 4.6 | 2.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.3 | 4.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.17 | 0 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.67 | 0.6 |
| Other | Leeds United | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.82 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | James Trafford (Leeds United) | Dean Henderson (Crystal Palace) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 16 | 12 |
| Save % | 84% | 60% |
| xG prevented | 64% | 47% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Leeds United a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Leeds United 42%, draw 30%, Crystal Palace 28%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 45% and under at 55%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.