01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Verl or draw (X2)73%
- Over 1.5 goals81%
3. Liga
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT:
Grossaspach's xG per match at 1.8 suggests an ability to create chances, yet their xGA at the same figure points to a porous defense. Verl, meanwhile, manages just 0.96 xG per match, indicating a struggle to generate offensive opportunities. Despite this, the visitors hold a 45% model probability of winning, showcasing the disparity between statistical form and expected outcomes.
Verl's tactical approach of possession control may clash with Grossaspach's counter-attacking style, potentially opening up spaces for the hosts. However, the model leans Verl's way, despite Verl's own xGA of 1.9 being higher than Grossaspach's 1.8 and their inferior goal creation metrics. These season trends are the basis for the lean.
With a 58% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 60% probability of both teams finding the net, the match is set for goals, but not without risks. Grossaspach's defense could be the decisive factor, allowing Verl to capitalize. The most compelling angle here is that Verl's model probability of 45% suggests value if their possession strategy effectively stifles the host's counter-attacks.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Grossaspach | X | 2 · Verl |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.65 | 3.40 | EV+ 5% 2.35 |
| Betsson | 2.65 | 3.40 | EV+ 5% 2.35 |
| Nordicbet | 2.65 | 3.40 | EV+ 5% 2.35 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 00:38
2.65 → 2.65
3.50 → 3.40
2.32 → 2.35
1.60 → 1.60
Betsson · 3 recorded price levels · 10/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Grossaspach | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 3 |
| xPoints | 5.9 | 3.3 |
| xG per match | 1.8 | 0.96 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.21 | 0.33 |
| Playing style | Grossaspach | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.65 | 0.62 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 0.88 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 18 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.36 | 0.35 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 22 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 375 | 427 |
| Passes against per match | 286 | 288 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.4 | 20.8 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Grossaspach | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 6.5 | 3 |
| Corners against per match | 5.5 | 4.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.25 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.68 | 0.41 |
| Other | Grossaspach | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Maximilian Reule (Grossaspach) | Timo Schlieck (Verl) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 16 | 14 |
| Save % | 84% | 58% |
| xG prevented | 86% | 32% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Verl a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Grossaspach 31%, draw 24%, Verl 45%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 58% and under at 42%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.