01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Hoffenheim to win51%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
BundesligaBorussia-Park, Mönchengladbach9°4,4 mm14 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Borussia Mönchengladbach vs Hoffenheim (Bundesliga, Sunday, 18 October 2026): Borussia Mönchengladbach win 25%, draw 24%, Hoffenheim win 51%. Expected goals (xG): Borussia Mönchengladbach 1.35, Hoffenheim 1.90. Most likely score: 1-1 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 63%, both teams to score 63%. Double chance: Borussia Mönchengladbach or draw 49%, Hoffenheim or draw 75%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The text states the head-to-head record is "evenly split," but the facts show Gladbach has 2W 1D 1L in the four meetings — a slight edge for Gladbach, not an even split. Here's the corrected text:
Hoffenheim's 51% chance of victory underscores a stark contrast between their current form and that of the hosts, who have dropped five consecutive matches. While the head-to-head record since 2022 actually favors Gladbach slightly (2W 1D 1L over four encounters), this small sample offers little comfort to a Gladbach side struggling in their recent outings. The visitors' possession-heavy, high-press approach is likely to find success against a leaky home defense, especially given the difference in expected goals against: 2.6 for Gladbach compared to Hoffenheim's more robust 1.5.
The expected goals model suggests a tight battle, with Hoffenheim edging Gladbach out at 1.90 to 1.35. However, the forecasted rain could dampen scoring opportunities, though the model already incorporates this factor. Despite a 63% chance for both the over 2.5 goals and both teams scoring, a closer look reveals potential value in the opposite direction. Betsafe and Nordicbet offer enticing odds of 3.07 on under 2.5 goals, with the model indicating a 37% likelihood—representing a notable 14% edge.
For those seeking greater risk, consider the under 1.5 goals at 6.75 with Betsafe, where the model suggests a 16% probability, offering a 10% edge. In a matchup where caution may prevail, these under bets present appealing value.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Borussia Mönchengladbach | X | 2 · Hoffenheim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.00 | 3.80 | EV+ 7% 2.10 |
| LeoVegas | 3.00 | 4.00 | EV+ 10% 2.15 |
| Nordicbet | 3.00 | 3.80 | EV+ 7% 2.10 |
Odds updated 18 Oct, 13:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Borussia Mönchengladbach win since 9 October — the odds have shortened from 3.30 to 3.00 (−9%).
3.30 → 3.00
4.00 → 4.00
1.98 → 2.15
1.38 → 1.38
LeoVegas · 50 recorded price levels · 09/10/2026 → 18/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Bundesliga data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Borussia Mönchengladbach | Hoffenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 3 |
| xPoints | 4.6 | 6.1 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 2.6 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.61 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Borussia Mönchengladbach | Hoffenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.71 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 23 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 332 | 421 |
| Passes against per match | 372 | 274 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.7 | 27 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Borussia Mönchengladbach | Hoffenheim |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Corners against per match | 5.3 | 4.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.11 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.24 | 0.53 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.56 |
| Other | Borussia Mönchengladbach | Hoffenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Moritz Nicolas (Borussia Mönchengladbach) | Oliver Baumann (Hoffenheim) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 29 | 12 |
| Save % | 62% | 50% |
| xG prevented | 41% | 44% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Hoffenheim a 51% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Borussia Mönchengladbach 25%, draw 24%, Hoffenheim 51%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The model expects 1.35 goals (xG) for Borussia Mönchengladbach and 1.90 for Hoffenheim, 3.25 in total.
Borussia Mönchengladbach or draw (1X) 49%, Hoffenheim or draw (X2) 75% and no draw (12) 76%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.