01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Elversberg to win46%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
Bundesliga11°3,1 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 4–3. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Elversberg vs Augsburg (Bundesliga, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Elversberg win 46%, draw 27%, Augsburg win 27%. Expected goals (xG): Elversberg 1.55, Augsburg 1.14. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 50%, both teams to score 54%. Double chance: Elversberg or draw 73%, Augsburg or draw 54%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT: A tension exists in Elversberg's clash with Augsburg, driven by an intriguing set of numbers. Despite Augsburg's slight edge in points (8 over 7) and xPoints (6.9 over 5.8), the model tips the scales towards Elversberg, granting them a 46% chance of victory compared to Augsburg's 27%. This suggests an opportunity for the hosts to capitalize, particularly since they boast a slightly better expected goals against (xGA) record at 2.1 compared to the visitors' 2.3.
The expected goals tally tells a different story, with Augsburg averaging 1.7 xG per match against Elversberg's 1.1. This disparity highlights a potential for the visitors to create more chances, albeit against a direct and low-defense approach from Elversberg that could stifle those opportunities. The most likely scorelines of 1-1, 1-0, and 2-1 reflect a balanced contest, where neither side seems poised to run away with it.
Weather could play an unspoken role here, with the forecast of 3.1 mm of rain potentially dampening attacking efforts and making the under 1.5 goals market worth a glance. However, the model's 50% probability for over 2.5 goals suggests caution. More compelling is the value in under 1.5 goals at odds of 5.87 with Betsafe and Nordicbet, and 5.75 with LeoVegas. The model's 25% probability for this outcome indicates a massive edge of up to 45%.
For all the statistical nuances, a 1-1 draw emerges as the likeliest result, aligning with the 12% chance assigned to it. Both teams to score at 54% corroborates this view. If you're hunting value, the under 1.5 goals market offers a sharp angle, with substantial potential returns where others see slim pickings.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Elversberg | X | 2 · Augsburg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 11% 2.42 | 3.60 | 2.65 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 14% 2.50 | EV+ 1% 3.75 | 2.65 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 11% 2.42 | 3.60 | 2.65 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 13% 2.47 | EV+ 1% 3.76 | 2.76 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 13:38
2.54 → 2.47
3.76 → 3.76
2.65 → 2.76
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Elversberg | Augsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 8 |
| xPoints | 5.8 | 6.9 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.55 | 0.45 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.46 |
| Playing style | Elversberg | Augsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| xT per match | 0.61 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 17 | 19 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 21 | 23 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 318 | 275 |
| Passes against per match | 435 | 510 |
| Switches of play per match | 21.5 | 19.5 |
| Long balls per match | 25 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Elversberg | Augsburg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.6 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 7.2 | 7.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.42 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.69 | 0.49 |
| Other | Elversberg | Augsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.65 |
| The goalkeepers | Nicolas Kristof (Elversberg) | Finn Dahmen (Augsburg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 15 | 30 |
| Save % | 65% | 79% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 69% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Elversberg a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Elversberg 46%, draw 27%, Augsburg 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The model expects 1.55 goals (xG) for Elversberg and 1.14 for Augsburg, 2.69 in total.
Elversberg or draw (1X) 73%, Augsburg or draw (X2) 54% and no draw (12) 73%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.