01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Borussia Dortmund to win56%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
BundesligaStadion An der Alten Försterei, Berlin12°0,1 mm14 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 0–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Union Berlin vs Borussia Dortmund (Bundesliga, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Union Berlin win 18%, draw 26%, Borussia Dortmund win 56%. Expected goals (xG): Union Berlin 1.07, Borussia Dortmund 1.65. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 51%, both teams to score 53%. Double chance: Union Berlin or draw 44%, Borussia Dortmund or draw 82%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT: A glance at the numbers tells us Borussia Dortmund have the upper hand against Union Berlin. With a 56% model probability of winning, Dortmund are clear favorites. This isn't just theoretical; their unbeaten run of seven league matches backs the data. Union has managed only one win in their last four encounters with Dortmund. But remember, such a small head-to-head sample might not tell the full story — so let's not overstate its weight.
Union Berlin’s style of play, characterized by low defense and directness, faces a daunting test. Dortmund’s possession and high press strategy thrives on exploiting teams like this. The expected goals (xG) figures show Dortmund ahead at 1.65 compared to Union’s 1.07, reinforcing the notion of Dortmund's edge. Their xGA of 0.89 per match further underscores their defensive robustness against Union’s more porous 2.1. The model tilts toward a 1-1 draw (12%) or a 0-1 victory for Dortmund (10%), painting a picture of a tight contest.
While the market sets the over/under at near even odds, the over 2.5 goals is only favored by a slim 51%. Add the fact that both teams to score sits at 53%, and the match could easily tilt towards a low-scoring affair. The expected points (xPoints) further illustrate the superiority of Dortmund, with a 9.3 to Union's 5.9.
Value hunters should note the odds on offer: under 1.5 goals at 5.58 with Betsafe and Nordicbet is rated at a 24% chance by the model, offering a hefty 35% edge. Additionally, under 2.5 goals at 2.61 with Betsafe presents a 28% value edge. For those looking for sharp angles, unders appear to be the market’s misstep here.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Union Berlin | X | 2 · Borussia Dortmund |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 6% 5.80 | EV+ 13% 4.40 | 1.49 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 1% 5.50 | EV+ 16% 4.50 | 1.55 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 6% 5.80 | EV+ 13% 4.40 | 1.49 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 4% 5.66 | EV+ 18% 4.57 | 1.56 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 13:38
5.17 → 5.66
4.52 → 4.57
1.59 → 1.56
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Bundesliga data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Union Berlin | Borussia Dortmund |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 13 |
| xPoints | 5.9 | 9.3 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 0.89 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.59 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.37 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Union Berlin | Borussia Dortmund |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.34 | 0.61 |
| xT per match | 0.99 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 0.85 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 30 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 285 | 444 |
| Passes against per match | 390 | 367 |
| Switches of play per match | 23.9 | 24.2 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Union Berlin | Borussia Dortmund |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 3.8 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 5.9 | 4.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.21 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.74 |
| Other | Union Berlin | Borussia Dortmund |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Frederik Ronnow (Union Berlin) | Gregor Kobel (Borussia Dortmund) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 20 | 14 |
| Save % | 59% | 78% |
| xG prevented | 38% | 81% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Borussia Dortmund a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Union Berlin 18%, draw 26%, Borussia Dortmund 56%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The model expects 1.07 goals (xG) for Union Berlin and 1.65 for Borussia Dortmund, 2.72 in total.
Union Berlin or draw (1X) 44%, Borussia Dortmund or draw (X2) 82% and no draw (12) 74%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.