Serie AStadio Artemio Franchi, Firenze22°6 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    FiorentinaFiorentinaLow block & direct
    vs
    NapoliNapoliBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 2 · Napoli (48%)

    Fiorentina vs Napoli · Serie A

    1 · Fiorentina 26%X 25%48% Napoli · 2

    Analysis: FiorentinaNapoli

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Four straight losses to Napoli since 2021 don't paint a pretty picture for Fiorentina. While the sample is small and less significant than current form, it reflects a broader pattern of struggle for the hosts. Add in their current three-game losing streak, and it becomes clear: Fiorentina are in a rut. In stark contrast, Napoli's visit comes with a wind at their back, making them the clear favorites according to both form and statistical models.

    The numbers reinforce this narrative. Fiorentina's low defensive profile is vulnerable to Napoli's balanced and physical approach, which has helped the visitors accumulate more points and expected points this season. The expected goals model further underscores Napoli's superiority, predicting 1.67 goals for them compared to just 0.95 for the hosts. Despite the fact that both teams have similar xGA, Fiorentina's inability to convert possession into goals remains a glaring issue.

    The most likely scorelines, 1-1 and 0-1, tell a story of a match where goals might be at a premium. With the over 2.5 goals probability at 49%, the market's leaning is finely balanced, yet the edge tilts towards a lower-scoring affair. Napoli's expected prowess in exploiting Fiorentina's direct but defensively suspect style suggests a 0-1 or 0-2 result is plausible.

    However, the sharpest angle lies in the model's read on the match. With Napoli's win probability at 48% against Fiorentina's 26% and a 25% draw chance, backing Napoli aligns not only with historical dominance but also current form and expected metrics. In a match fraught with tension for the hosts, the visitors seem poised to capitalize once again.

    FiorentinaFiorentina
    Form WDLLL
    League ranking xG #13xGA #16xT #6xP/match #15Points #20
    Key players
    • Mateo PellegrinoFxG 0.11 · xT -0.02
    • Cher NdourRWxG 0.07 · xT 0.23
    • Franco MastantuonoRWxG 0.24 · xT 0.13
    NapoliNapoli
    Form WWWLL
    League ranking xG #6xGA #17xT #5xP/match #8Points #12
    Key players
    • Rasmus HojlundFxG 0.29 · xT -0.06
    • Matteo PolitanoRWxG 0.16 · xT 0.22
    • Amir RrahmaniCBxG 0.01 · xT 0.11

    Match prediction: FiorentinaNapoli

    Predicted score matrix

    Napoli
    Fiorentina
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.6%
    0–111.8%
    0–210.1%
    0–35.6%
    0–4+3.4%
    1
    1–06.6%
    1–111.9%
    1–29.6%
    1–35.4%
    1–4+3.3%
    2
    2–03.3%
    2–15.5%
    2–24.6%
    2–32.6%
    2–4+1.6%
    3
    3–01.0%
    3–11.8%
    3–21.5%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–00.3%
    4+–10.5%
    4+–20.4%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.0-112%
    3. 3.0-210%
    4. 4.1-210%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    0,951,67
    Both teams to score
    50%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,551%
    @1.93
    Over 2,549%
    @1.93

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Napoli to win48%
    • Under 3.5 goals73%

    Combined probability

    37%

    Fair odds

    2.69

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Napoli to win48%
    • Under 2.5 goals51%
    • Rasmus Winther Højlund to score31%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score50%
    • Over 2.5 goals49%
    • Rasmus Winther Højlund to score31%
    • Amir Rrahmani to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Napoli48% probability@2.25BetssonEV+8%reference odds
    • 2 · Napoli48% probability@2.25NordicbetEV+8%reference odds
    • 2 · Napoli48% probability@2.23PinnacleEV+7%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · FiorentinaX2 · Napoli
    Betsafe3.253.30
    EV+ 7%
    2.22
    Betsson3.303.30
    EV+ 8%
    2.25
    Nordicbet3.303.30
    EV+ 8%
    2.25
    Pinnacle3.343.45
    EV+ 7%
    2.23

    Odds updated 15 Sept, 10:36

    Odds movement

    1+2 %
    31 %26 %

    3.263.34

    X+1 %
    30 %25 %

    3.413.45

    2+1 %
    46 %41 %

    2.202.23

    Over 2,5-2 %
    52 %47 %

    1.981.93

    Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 12/09/2026 → 15/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Fiorentina 0Draw 0Napoli 4
    Goals: 412 (⌀ 4)

    Head-to-head based on Serie A data since 2021.

    Key facts

    • ACF Fiorentina have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Fiorentina
    Napoli
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Fiorentina (19)
    Napoli (55)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Fiorentina
    Arthur Atta: 93 passningar, xT 0.16AttaJoão Mário: 86 passningar, xT 0.39MárioNicolò Fagioli: 84 passningar, xT 0.22FagioliVíctor Valdepeñas Talavera: 76 passningar, xT 0.39TalaveraCher Ndour: 75 passningar, xT 0.51NdourRadu Dragusin: 72 passningar, xT 0.11DragusinDavid De Gea: 52 passningar, xT 0.1GeaChrist Inao Oulaï: 52 passningar, xT 0.03OulaïFranco Mastantuono: 46 passningar, xT 0.09MastantuonoViery Fernandes Santos Lopes: 39 passningar, xT 0.07LopesMarin Pongracic: 37 passningar, xT 0.02Pongracic
    Napoli
    Amir Rrahmani: 164 passningar, xT 0.32RrahmaniRafa Marin: 132 passningar, xT 0.18MarinStanislav Lobotka: 131 passningar, xT 0.25LobotkaGiovanni Di Lorenzo: 129 passningar, xT 0.54LorenzoLeonardo Spinazzola: 128 passningar, xT 0.55SpinazzolaAlex Meret: 70 passningar, xT 0.01MeretFrank Anguissa: 65 passningar, xT -0.03AnguissaMatteo Politano: 64 passningar, xT 0.53PolitanoKevin De Bruyne: 46 passningar, xT 0.17BruyneScott Mctominay: 45 passningar, xT -0.04MctominayAlisson de Almeida Santos: 34 passningar, xT 0.24Santos
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Fiorentina
    Arthur Atta: 93 passningar, xT 0.16AttaJoão Mário: 86 passningar, xT 0.39MárioNicolò Fagioli: 84 passningar, xT 0.22FagioliVíctor Valdepeñas Talavera: 76 passningar, xT 0.39TalaveraCher Ndour: 75 passningar, xT 0.51NdourRadu Dragusin: 72 passningar, xT 0.11DragusinDavid De Gea: 52 passningar, xT 0.1GeaChrist Inao Oulaï: 52 passningar, xT 0.03OulaïFranco Mastantuono: 46 passningar, xT 0.09MastantuonoViery Fernandes Santos Lopes: 39 passningar, xT 0.07LopesMarin Pongracic: 37 passningar, xT 0.02Pongracic
    Napoli
    Amir Rrahmani: 164 passningar, xT 0.32RrahmaniRafa Marin: 132 passningar, xT 0.18MarinStanislav Lobotka: 131 passningar, xT 0.25LobotkaGiovanni Di Lorenzo: 129 passningar, xT 0.54LorenzoLeonardo Spinazzola: 128 passningar, xT 0.55SpinazzolaAlex Meret: 70 passningar, xT 0.01MeretFrank Anguissa: 65 passningar, xT -0.03AnguissaMatteo Politano: 64 passningar, xT 0.53PolitanoKevin De Bruyne: 46 passningar, xT 0.17BruyneScott Mctominay: 45 passningar, xT -0.04MctominayAlisson de Almeida Santos: 34 passningar, xT 0.24Santos

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceFiorentinaNapoli
    Points03
    xPoints3.24.2
    xG per match1.11.6
    xGA per match1.81.9
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.270.27
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.490.25
    Playing styleFiorentinaNapoli
    Build-up efficiency0.310.31
    Field tilt0.480.46
    xT per match1.21.2
    xTA per match1.11.4
    Won balls, offensive half2018
    Pressing intensity0.230.26
    Pressing efficiency0.250.22
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.180.18
    Entries into the box per match1315
    Entries into the box against1218
    Pass completion %0.750.8
    Pass completion % under pressure0.690.72
    Passes per match315369
    Passes against per match401476
    Switches of play per match15.230
    Long balls per match2730
    Set piecesFiorentinaNapoli
    xG from free kicks00
    Corners per match4.74
    Corners against per match4.17.2
    xG per corner0.040
    xGA per corner against0.020.06
    First touch, offensive corners %0.360.58
    First touch, defensive corners %0.50.68
    OtherFiorentinaNapoli
    Throw-in control0.640.76
    The goalkeepersDavid De Gea (Fiorentina)Alex Meret (Napoli)
    Saves911
    Save %50%69%
    xG prevented20%29%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Fiorentina vs Napoli according to our model?

    The model gives Napoli a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Fiorentina 26%, draw 25%, Napoli 48%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.