01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Como to win57%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Serie AStadio Benito Stirpe, Frosinone24°13 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT:
Frosinone's home clash with Como hinges on a significant figure: 57%. That’s the probability the models are giving Como to win, reflecting their unbeaten streak of eight league matches. Despite having only a single point more than their hosts in the standings, the visitors have been more adept in controlling games, as evidenced by their higher expected goals (1.6 xG) compared to Frosinone's 1.0.
The teams have a small direct history, meaning head-to-head stats hold less weight here. Instead, recent form and match data suggest Como's possession-based style could unravel Frosinone's low defense, especially given the hosts' concerning 1.8 xGA per match. The most likely scoreline of 1-1 at 12% reflects some market caution, but 0-1 isn't far behind at 10%, hinting that Como might edge it by a slim margin.
The model leans toward Como given the overall probabilities. This scenario doesn't promise a glut of goals, with over 2.5 goals just a shade above coin-flip territory at 51%. Expect a controlled Como performance to shape the match, potentially seeing them edge a 1-0 or 2-1 victory on the road.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Frosinone | X | 2 · Como |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 17% 5.90 | 4.20 | 1.55 |
| Betsson | EV+ 18% 5.95 | 4.20 | 1.55 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 18% 5.95 | 4.20 | 1.55 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 29% 6.51 | EV+ 4% 4.41 | 1.51 |
Odds updated 15 Sept, 08:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Como win since 12 September — the odds have shortened from 1.61 to 1.51 (−6%).
5.58 → 6.51
3.86 → 4.41
1.61 → 1.51
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 12/09/2026 → 15/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Frosinone | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 7 |
| xPoints | 4 | 3.5 |
| xG per match | 1 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.22 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.36 | 0.17 |
| Playing style | Frosinone | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.37 | 0.62 |
| xT per match | 0.71 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.8 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 18 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 18 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.63 | 0.86 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.57 | 0.79 |
| Passes per match | 184 | 548 |
| Passes against per match | 350 | 346 |
| Switches of play per match | 12.7 | 24.1 |
| Long balls per match | 22 | 27 |
| Set pieces | Frosinone | Como |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 4.2 | 7 |
| Corners against per match | 7.2 | 2.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.69 | 0.48 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.5 |
| Other | Frosinone | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.83 |
| The goalkeepers | Lorenzo Palmisani (Frosinone) | Jean Butez (Como) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 10 | 4 |
| Save % | 77% | 57% |
| xG prevented | 44% | 50% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Como a 57% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Frosinone 20%, draw 24%, Como 57%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.