01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima to win77%
- Over 1.5 goals86%
J1 LeagueEdion Peace Wing, Hiroshima20°8 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 3–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs Kyoto Sanga (J1 League, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Sanfrecce Hiroshima win 77%, draw 14%, Kyoto Sanga win 8%. Expected goals (xG): Sanfrecce Hiroshima 2.75, Kyoto Sanga 0.74. Most likely score: 2-0 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 68%, both teams to score 49%. Double chance: Sanfrecce Hiroshima or draw 92%, Kyoto Sanga or draw 23%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Sanfrecce Hiroshima's current winning streak serves as a testament to their tactical finesse, particularly their potent combination of possession and high pressing. With three consecutive victories under their belt, the home side enters this clash against Kyoto Sanga with visible momentum. The hosts average an impressive 2.6 xG per match while conceding just 0.57 xGA, underscoring their attacking prowess and defensive solidity. Meanwhile, Kyoto Sanga's more possession-focused approach hasn't translated into results, as indicated by their lackluster 1.1 xG and 1.6 xGA per match.
While the head-to-head record since 2023 shows a narrow edge for Kyoto in six encounters, that small sample holds less weight compared to the current form and projected goal metrics. Sanfrecce's superior point tally and xPoints further reinforce their dominance in this matchup. The model assigns a whopping 77% probability to the hosts, suggesting a comfortable win is on the cards.
The expected goals tally heavily favors Sanfrecce, pointing toward a likely scoreline of 2-0 or 3-0. With a 68% chance of the match going over 2.5 goals and Sanfrecce's tendency to exploit defensive lapses through relentless pressing, goals could come in abundance. Yet, with Kyoto's limited scoring potential, the "both teams to score" prospect sits at a coin flip.
For those eyeing betting value, the odds on a Sanfrecce victory offer slight positive expected value (EV+) with bookmakers like LeoVegas at 1.333, as well as Betsafe and Nordicbet at 1.32. Given the model's 77% confidence in a home win, these odds present a mathematically sound opportunity, especially when combined with the robust statistical backing for a dominant Sanfrecce performance.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Sanfrecce Hiroshima | X | 2 · Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 4% 1.34 | 4.80 | 7.20 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 3% 1.33 | 5.20 | 7.50 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 4% 1.34 | 4.80 | 7.20 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 6% 1.37 | 5.29 | 8.00 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 08:18
1.34 → 1.37
5.45 → 5.29
7.55 → 8.00
Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on J1 League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 20 | 8 |
| xPoints | 19 | 11.2 |
| xG per match | 2.6 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 0.57 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.55 | 0.45 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.08 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.71 | 0.48 |
| xT per match | 1.8 | 0.95 |
| xTA per match | 0.66 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 22 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 489 | 312 |
| Passes against per match | 284 | 362 |
| Switches of play per match | 35.8 | 18.8 |
| Long balls per match | 43 | 22 |
| Set pieces | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| Corners per match | 7 | 3.2 |
| Corners against per match | 2.1 | 6.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.46 | 0.34 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.67 |
| Other | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Issei Ouchi (Sanfrecce Hiroshima) | Hedhe Halls Rocha da Silva (Kyoto Sanga) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 15 | 21 |
| Save % | 79% | 72% |
| xG prevented | 53% | 55% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Sanfrecce Hiroshima a 77% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sanfrecce Hiroshima 77%, draw 14%, Kyoto Sanga 8%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 68% and under at 32%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The model expects 2.75 goals (xG) for Sanfrecce Hiroshima and 0.74 for Kyoto Sanga, 3.49 in total.
Sanfrecce Hiroshima or draw (1X) 92%, Kyoto Sanga or draw (X2) 23% and no draw (12) 86%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.