01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Tegevajaro Miyazaki or draw (1X)69%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
J2 League22°15 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Tegevajaro Miyazaki vs Jubilo Iwata (J2 League, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Tegevajaro Miyazaki win 42%, draw 28%, Jubilo Iwata win 30%. Expected goals (xG): Tegevajaro Miyazaki 1.55, Jubilo Iwata 1.28. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 54%, both teams to score 57%. Double chance: Tegevajaro Miyazaki or draw 70%, Jubilo Iwata or draw 58%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Tegevajaro Miyazaki enter this clash as the statistical favorites, boasting a 42% chance of victory against Jubilo Iwata's 30%, according to the model. Despite Miyazaki's unbeaten run in their last five league games, Jubilo Iwata's xPoints (15.5) slightly edge out Miyazaki's (15.2). This subtle tension between form and underlying metrics makes the encounter intriguing.
Miyazaki's strength lies in their ability to capitalize quickly after winning the ball, with an xG of 0.27 in such situations, significantly higher than Iwata's 0.13. Both teams favor a possession-based style, suggesting a tactical battle in the midfield. However, the visitors have shown a more robust defense on paper, conceding fewer expected goals per match (0.96) than the hosts (1.1).
The most probable scorelines include a 1-1 draw (12%), with 2-1 and 1-0 wins for Miyazaki each at 9%. The expected goals (xG) suggest a close game, with Miyazaki's 1.55 slightly outpacing Iwata's 1.28. The over 2.5 goals market is leaned towards at 54%, while both teams scoring stands at 57%, indicating a reasonable expectation of goals.
With Betsafe and Nordicbet offering odds of 2.62 for a Miyazaki win, there's a notable 9% value edge, making it a potentially smart play for those looking to back the home team. Additionally, the over 3.5 goals market presents a 7% edge at odds of 3.4 with Betsafe, appealing to those expecting an open game.
While Miyazaki seems favored statistically, the narrow margins in xPoints and Iwata's defensive edge call for caution. Still, the value lies with Miyazaki to continue their unbeaten streak, especially at the attractive odds available.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Tegevajaro Miyazaki | X | 2 · Jubilo Iwata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.32 | 2.95 | 3.00 |
| LeoVegas | 2.30 | 2.95 | 2.95 |
| Nordicbet | 2.32 | 2.95 | 3.00 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 2% 2.46 | 3.06 | 3.12 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 12:15
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards under 2.5 goals since 11 October — the odds have shortened from 1.77 to 1.58 (−11%).
2.67 → 2.46
3.40 → 3.06
2.49 → 3.12
2.01 → 2.38
Pinnacle · 15 recorded price levels · 11/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 20 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Tegevajaro Miyazaki | Jubilo Iwata |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 13 | 13 |
| xPoints | 15.2 | 15.5 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 0.96 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.27 | 0.13 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Playing style | Tegevajaro Miyazaki | Jubilo Iwata |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.59 |
| xT per match | 0.74 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 0.93 | 0.78 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.36 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 302 | 353 |
| Passes against per match | 344 | 274 |
| Switches of play per match | 30.8 | 28.9 |
| Long balls per match | 44 | 36 |
| Set pieces | Tegevajaro Miyazaki | Jubilo Iwata |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.14 | 0.08 |
| Corners per match | 3.7 | 6.3 |
| Corners against per match | 4.5 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.59 |
| Other | Tegevajaro Miyazaki | Jubilo Iwata |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.81 |
| The goalkeepers | Ryoya Kimura (Tegevajaro Miyazaki) | Ayumi Niekawa (Jubilo Iwata) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 14 | 21 |
| Save % | 70% | 70% |
| xG prevented | 39% | 43% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Tegevajaro Miyazaki a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Tegevajaro Miyazaki 42%, draw 28%, Jubilo Iwata 30%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The model expects 1.55 goals (xG) for Tegevajaro Miyazaki and 1.28 for Jubilo Iwata, 2.83 in total.
Tegevajaro Miyazaki or draw (1X) 70%, Jubilo Iwata or draw (X2) 58% and no draw (12) 72%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.