01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Yokohama FC to win47%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
J2 League18°6 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Tochigi City vs Yokohama FC (J2 League, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Tochigi City win 28%, draw 25%, Yokohama FC win 47%. Expected goals (xG): Tochigi City 1.43, Yokohama FC 1.92. Most likely score: 1-1 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 65%, both teams to score 65%. Double chance: Tochigi City or draw 53%, Yokohama FC or draw 72%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
Tochigi City, reeling from four consecutive losses, face off against a Yokohama FC team that thrives on controlling possession. The matchup is underscored by Tochigi's recent woes, which not only see them languishing in poor form but also grappling with defensive vulnerabilities. With an expected goals against of 1.6 per match, Tochigi's defense is porous, a stark contrast to Yokohama's more robust 1.2. This defensive edge aligns with the visitors’ superior points tally and expected points, reinforcing their status as favorites at 47% to take the win.
For Tochigi, the tactic is likely clear: absorb pressure and strike on the counter. Yet, this approach might struggle against a Yokohama side adept at keeping the ball and dictating play. The model suggests a 1-2 scoreline as one of the most probable outcomes, reflecting both the hosts' counter tactics and the visitors' possession prowess. Tochigi’s 1.43 expected goals hint at potential, yet Yokohama's superior positioning in xG, xPoints, and overall points suggest they can outmaneuver Tochigi’s strategy, pushing them closer to a win.
Goals are on the menu here, with a 65% probability of seeing more than 2.5, supported by both teams’ profiles and recent performances. This is further evidenced by the high expected goals for both sides — Tochigi at 1.43 and Yokohama at 1.92. The model's lean toward over 2.5 goals aligns with the expected style of play, where Tochigi’s counter-attacks might open up spaces for Yokohama to exploit.
For those eyeing betting angles, the over 2.5 goals market presents a minor value edge at odds of 1.55 with both Betsafe and Nordicbet, as the model rates this outcome a 65% probability, providing a tempting 1% value edge. In a match that is likely to see goals, this could be the standout angle for savvy bettors.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Tochigi City | X | 2 · Yokohama FC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.50 | 3.60 | 1.85 |
| LeoVegas | 3.40 | 3.60 | 1.83 |
| Nordicbet | 3.50 | 3.60 | 1.85 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 6% 3.74 | EV+ 4% 4.22 | 1.81 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 08:18
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Yokohama FC win since 10 October — the odds have shortened from 2.09 to 1.81 (−14%).
3.06 → 3.74
3.77 → 4.22
2.09 → 1.81
Pinnacle · 10 recorded price levels · 10/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Tochigi City | Yokohama FC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 17 |
| xPoints | 10.8 | 13.4 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.38 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Tochigi City | Yokohama FC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.46 | 0.58 |
| xT per match | 0.95 | 0.98 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 0.93 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 17 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 337 | 367 |
| Passes against per match | 294 | 312 |
| Switches of play per match | 29.6 | 24.8 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 39 |
| Set pieces | Tochigi City | Yokohama FC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 3.8 | 5.1 |
| Corners against per match | 6.2 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.65 | 0.59 |
| Other | Tochigi City | Yokohama FC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| The goalkeepers | Jin-Hyeon Kim (Tochigi City) | Akinori Ichikawa (Yokohama FC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 39 | 35 |
| Save % | 71% | 76% |
| xG prevented | 57% | 56% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Yokohama FC a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Tochigi City 28%, draw 25%, Yokohama FC 47%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 65% and under at 35%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.
The model expects 1.43 goals (xG) for Tochigi City and 1.92 for Yokohama FC, 3.35 in total.
Tochigi City or draw (1X) 53%, Yokohama FC or draw (X2) 72% and no draw (12) 75%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.