Liga Portugal 225°22 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    ChavesChavesPossession control
    14
    AcadémicaAcadémica
    The model's lean: 1 · Chaves (41%)Best value by the model: 2 · Académica @ 4.40 (+34 %)

    Chaves vs Académica · Liga Portugal 2

    1 · Chaves 41%X 28%30% Académica · 2

    Analysis: ChavesAcadémica

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    41% is a number that speaks volumes. The model gives Chaves a solid edge over Academica, but not quite enough to label them outright favourites. This match sits in a delicate balance, with a slight leaning towards the home side managing to scrape through. But the numbers tease us with the possibility of an upset, especially when the odds are taken into account. The most likely scorelines suggest a narrow affair, with a 1-1 draw (13%) leading the charge, closely followed by a 1-0 victory for Chaves (11%). It's a match poised on the knife-edge of expectations.

    Chaves must weigh the advantage of playing at home against Academica's tempting odds. Academica's 30% probability of winning is tantalizing given the odds of 4.26 offered by Pinnacle. Here lies a significant edge of 30% — a siren call for value hunters. The small sample size of head-to-head encounters between these two sides means we should place more weight on current form and expected goals, rather than past results. The expected goal tally of 1.38 for Chaves against Academica's 1.16 underscores a tight contest, but not one entirely devoid of goalmouth action.

    Academica, though underdogs on paper, hold an intriguing potential for an upset. Perhaps the winds of fortune may blow their way, especially with such a value proposition at Pinnacle. Meanwhile, the over/under 2.5 goals market offers its own narrative. At 47%, the over 2.5 goals threshold sits right on the edge, making it less of a clear-cut bet. However, with a slight value edge at odds of 2.22 with Pinnacle, the over 2.5 goals line tempts the daring bettor with a modest 3% edge.

    An argument can be made for a 1-1 draw, which seems the most probable outcome. Yet, the allure of an Academica victory at those juicy odds cannot be ignored. For the adventurous punter, Academica at 4.26 with Pinnacle holds the sharpest edge, a potential payday for those willing to defy the home bias.

    ChavesChaves
    Form LWLLW
    League ranking xG #3xGA #3xT #8xP/match #4Points #9
    Key players
    • Roberto Porfírio Maximiano RodrigoFxG 0.41 · xT 0.03
    • Bruno RodriguesCBxG 0.09 · xT 0.06
    • Rui Filipe Caetano MouraRWxG 0.09 · xT 0.22
    AcadémicaAcadémica
    Final score
    14
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Chaves 41% · Draw 28% · Académica 30%

    Match prediction: ChavesAcadémica

    Predicted score matrix

    Académica
    Chaves
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.2%
    0–18.8%
    0–25.3%
    0–32.1%
    0–4+0.8%
    1
    1–010.5%
    1–113.0%
    1–27.3%
    1–32.8%
    1–4+1.1%
    2
    2–07.5%
    2–18.7%
    2–25.1%
    2–32.0%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–03.4%
    3–14.0%
    3–22.3%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–01.6%
    4+–11.9%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.0-19%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,381,16
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,553%
    @1.71
    Over 2,547%
    @2.32EV+8%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Chaves or draw (1X)69%
    • Under 3.5 goals75%

    Combined probability

    51%

    Fair odds

    1.95

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Chaves or draw (1X)69%
    • Under 2.5 goals53%
    • Jorge Delgado Caballero to score27%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score52%
    • Over 2.5 goals47%
    • Jorge Delgado Caballero to score27%
    • Talysson Moreira Reis to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Académica30% probability@4.40Betfair ExchangeEV+34%reference odds
    • 2 · Académica30% probability@4.29PinnacleEV+31%reference odds
    • 2 · Académica30% probability@4.00Bet365EV+22%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · ChavesX2 · Académica
    Bet3651.803.25
    EV+ 22%
    4.00
    Betfair Exchange2.063.35
    EV+ 34%
    4.40
    Pinnacle2.003.16
    EV+ 31%
    4.29

    Odds updated 8 Aug, 10:09

    Odds movement

    1+4 %
    51 %46 %

    1.922.00

    X-4 %
    32 %27 %

    3.303.16

    2+4 %
    25 %20 %

    4.134.29

    Over 2,5+6 %
    46 %41 %

    2.112.23

    Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 05/08/2026 → 08/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Chaves
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Chaves (4240)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Chaves
    Tiago Alexandre Almeida Simoes: 229 passningar, xT 0.42SimoesTalysson Moreira Reis: 173 passningar, xT 0.22ReisBruno Rodrigues: 170 passningar, xT 0.33RodriguesPedro Pinho: 168 passningar, xT 0.09PinhoAaron Romero: 143 passningar, xT 0.74RomeroRui Filipe Caetano Moura: 120 passningar, xT 0.7MouraAndre Rodrigues: 114 passningar, xT 0.24RodriguesReinaldo Nascimento Satorno: 97 passningar, xT 0.7SatornoJosimar José Évora Dias: 81 passningar, xT 0.06DiasDavid Kusso: 76 passningar, xT 0.3KussoFrancisco José Vilas Boas Pereira: 67 passningar, xT 0.09Pereira
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Chaves
    Tiago Alexandre Almeida Simoes: 229 passningar, xT 0.42SimoesTalysson Moreira Reis: 173 passningar, xT 0.22ReisBruno Rodrigues: 170 passningar, xT 0.33RodriguesPedro Pinho: 168 passningar, xT 0.09PinhoAaron Romero: 143 passningar, xT 0.74RomeroRui Filipe Caetano Moura: 120 passningar, xT 0.7MouraAndre Rodrigues: 114 passningar, xT 0.24RodriguesReinaldo Nascimento Satorno: 97 passningar, xT 0.7SatornoJosimar José Évora Dias: 81 passningar, xT 0.06DiasDavid Kusso: 76 passningar, xT 0.3KussoFrancisco José Vilas Boas Pereira: 67 passningar, xT 0.09Pereira
    The goalkeepersJosimar José Évora Dias (Chaves)Académica
    Saves44
    Save %67%
    xG prevented36%
    Claims0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Chaves vs Académica according to our model?

    The model gives Chaves a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Chaves 41%, draw 28%, Académica 30%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.