01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Alverca or draw (1X)72%
- Under 3.5 goals81%
Primeira Liga
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
The betting markets might be overlooking Alverca in this matchup. Despite recent form showing a slight points edge for Rio Ave, the underlying numbers tell a different story. Alverca's expected goals per match at 1.1, nearly double that of their opponents' 0.54, suggest they’ve been more capable of creating scoring opportunities. Furthermore, their model probability to win stands at 40%, significantly higher than Rio Ave’s 26%.
The head-to-head record, albeit a small sample of just two games, slightly favors the hosts with one win and one draw since 2023. While not definitive, it does bolster the narrative of Alverca's current strengths. Expected goals further lean towards a narrow victory for the home side, with the most likely scorelines being a tight 1-1 or a 1-0 win for Alverca, both at a 13% probability.
Given their superior xPoints of 5.4 compared to Rio Ave’s 4.0, Alverca appear to hold an edge in underlying quality. With both teams' defensive tendencies, a low-scoring affair is likely—highlighted by a 39% likelihood for over 2.5 goals. Expect a cautious encounter, tilting towards Alverca.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Alverca | X | 2 · Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | 2.02 | EV+ 19% 3.50 | 3.80 |
| Betsafe | 1.85 | EV+ 16% 3.40 | EV+ 7% 4.10 |
| Betsson | 1.85 | EV+ 16% 3.40 | EV+ 7% 4.10 |
| Nordicbet | 1.85 | EV+ 16% 3.40 | EV+ 7% 4.10 |
| Pinnacle | 1.88 | EV+ 18% 3.48 | EV+ 11% 4.22 |
Odds updated 15 Sept, 10:36
Head-to-head based on Primeira Liga data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Alverca | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 2 | 3 |
| xPoints | 5.4 | 4 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 0.54 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.36 | 0.1 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.38 | 0.26 |
| Playing style | Alverca | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.26 |
| Field tilt | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| xT per match | 0.58 | 0.47 |
| xTA per match | 0.79 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.2 | 0.15 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 6 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 283 | 300 |
| Passes against per match | 426 | 446 |
| Switches of play per match | 21.6 | 23.1 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Alverca | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Corners per match | 5.3 | 3 |
| Corners against per match | 3.2 | 5.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.69 | 0.57 |
| Other | Alverca | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.66 |
| The goalkeepers | Matheus Mendes Werneck de Oliveira (Alverca) | Ennio van der Gouw (Rio Ave) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 18 | 19 |
| Save % | 67% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 34% | 53% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Alverca a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Alverca 40%, draw 34%, Rio Ave 26%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 39% and under at 61%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.