Swedish Ettan3°13 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Umeå FCUmeå FCPossession control
    3–1
    Assyriska FFAssyriska FFCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 2 · Assyriska FF (39%)

    Umeå FC vs Assyriska FF · Swedish Ettan

    1 · Umeå FC 36%X 25%39% Assyriska FF · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 3–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Umeå FC vs Assyriska FF (Swedish Ettan, Sunday, 18 October 2026): Umeå FC win 36%, draw 25%, Assyriska FF win 39%. Expected goals (xG): Umeå FC 1.65, Assyriska FF 1.54. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 62%, both teams to score 64%. Double chance: Umeå FC or draw 61%, Assyriska FF or draw 64%. Prediction updated Saturday, 10 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Umeå FC – Assyriska FF

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    The head-to-head record shows Umeå FC with a perfect streak, having won all three encounters against Assyriska FF since 2023. However, this small sample size doesn't carry much weight compared to current form and expected goals. While Umeå holds the historical upper hand, the model leans toward Assyriska as the more likely victor in this matchup.

    Assyriska's counter-attacking style could pose problems for Umeå's possession-based control, especially given their edge in defensive metrics — Assyriska's expected goals against per match are slightly lower than Umeå's. Yet, Umeå seems marginally stronger in offensive metrics, with a slight lead in expected goals and goals within eight seconds of winning the ball.

    The model suggests a close contest with probabilities almost evenly split: 36% for Umeå, 39% for Assyriska, and 25% for a draw. Expected goals data imply a tight scoreline, with 1-1 being the most likely outcome at 11%. The odds favor an open game with over 2.5 goals hitting 62%. Given the attacking profiles and goal probabilities, both teams finding the net stands at a strong 64%.

    For those seeking value, Assyriska's victory at odds of 3.0 with Betsafe and Nordicbet presents a compelling case. The model's estimation gives them a 39% chance, translating into a significant edge of 16%. While Umeå's home form and past success might deter some, the value bet lies with the visitors, as the model's lean toward Assyriska reflects the dynamics of this clash.

    Umeå FCUmeå FC
    Form WWLWW
    League ranking xG #6xGA #26xT #26xP/match #10Points #16
    Key players
    • Rasmus AnderssonCBxG 0.06 · xT 0.09
    • Stefan LindmarkCMxG 0.06 · xT 0.30
    • Fredrick Udoh GodwinCDMxG 0.05 · xT 0.04
    Assyriska FFAssyriska FF
    Form LWLLW
    League ranking xG #19xGA #14xT #12xP/match #12Points #15
    Key players
    • Kevin JarrettCAMxG 0.16 · xT 0.10
    • Victor ÅsbergCDMxG 0.06 · xT 0.10
    • Sebastian WändinRWBxG 0.04 · xT 0.14
    Final score
    3 – 1
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Umeå FC 36% · Draw 25% · Assyriska FF 39%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - Assyriska FFBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 7,44fair 7,93-6 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - Umeå FCBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 4,61fair 6,89-33 %
    Hit

    Match prediction: Umeå FC – Assyriska FF

    Predicted score matrix

    Assyriska FF →
    Umeå FC →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.4%
    0–16.0%
    0–24.9%
    0–32.5%
    0–4+1.4%
    1
    1–06.5%
    1–110.8%
    1–28.1%
    1–34.1%
    1–4+2.2%
    2
    2–05.6%
    2–18.6%
    2–26.6%
    2–33.4%
    2–4+1.8%
    3
    3–03.1%
    3–14.7%
    3–23.6%
    3–31.9%
    3–4+1.0%
    4+
    4+–01.8%
    4+–12.8%
    4+–22.2%
    4+–31.1%
    4+–4+0.6%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-28%
    4. 4.2-27%
    5. 5.1-07%
    Expected goals
    1,65–1,54
    Both teams to score
    64%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,2
    Under 2,538%
    @2.45
    Over 2,562%
    @1.49

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Assyriska FF or draw (X2)60%
    • Over 1.5 goals83%

    Combined probability

    49%

    Fair odds

    2.03

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Assyriska FF or draw (X2)60%
    • Over 2.5 goals62%
    • Felix Felder Aaltonen to score28%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score64%
    • Over 2.5 goals62%
    • Felix Felder Aaltonen to score28%
    • Stefan Lindmark to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Assyriska FF39% probability@3.30BetsafeEV+28%reference odds
    • 2 · Assyriska FF39% probability@3.30NordicbetEV+28%reference odds
    • 2 · Assyriska FF39% probability@3.20LeoVegasEV+24%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Umeå FCX2 · Assyriska FF
    Betsafe1.953.50
    EV+ 28%
    3.30
    LeoVegas1.933.50
    EV+ 24%
    3.20
    Nordicbet1.953.50
    EV+ 28%
    3.30

    Odds updated 18 Oct, 03:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards a Umeå FC win since 13 October — the odds have shortened from 2.20 to 1.95 (−11%).

    1-11 %
    49 %39 %

    2.20 → 1.95

    X-5 %
    30 %20 %

    3.70 → 3.50

    2+25 %
    36 %26 %

    2.65 → 3.30

    Over 2,5+6 %
    69 %59 %

    1.40 → 1.49

    Nordicbet · 10 recorded price levels · 13/10/2026 → 18/10/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    3 matches
    Umeå FC 3Draw 0Assyriska FF 0
    Goals: 10–3 (⌀ 4,3)

    Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Umeå FC
    Assyriska FF
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Umeå FC (36–42)
    Assyriska FF (44–45)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Umeå FC
    David Ekman: 209 passningar, xT 0.35EkmanNeo Lindén: 176 passningar, xT 0.37LindénJerry Essombe Mambingo: 133 passningar, xT 0.08MambingoRasmus Andersson: 133 passningar, xT 0.42AnderssonSimon Wagnsson: 124 passningar, xT 0.11WagnssonFredrick Udoh Godwin: 118 passningar, xT 0.1GodwinMusa Njie: 72 passningar, xT 0.72NjiePontus Eriksson: 66 passningar, xT 0.3ErikssonIsak Johansson: 64 passningar, xT 0.3JohanssonSam Forsman: 57 passningar, xT 1.89ForsmanSteve Zishim Bawa: 55 passningar, xT -0.13Bawa
    Assyriska FF
    Elias Ländin Sjöblom: 194 passningar, xT 1.55SjöblomKevin Jarrett: 188 passningar, xT 0.22JarrettSebastian Wändin: 181 passningar, xT 0.23WändinVictor Åsberg: 173 passningar, xT 0.71ÅsbergAmadou Kalabane: 172 passningar, xT 0.2KalabaneSamuel Uddenberg Edgren: 159 passningar, xT 0.48EdgrenFelix Felder Aaltonen: 143 passningar, xT 2.8AaltonenLiam Tahwildaran: 131 passningar, xT 0.38TahwildaranMartín Ignacio Larraín Guzmán: 81 passningar, xT 1.07GuzmánMartin Haddad: 54 passningar, xT 0.19HaddadViktor Widerberg: 52 passningar, xT 0.16Widerberg
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Umeå FC
    David Ekman: 209 passningar, xT 0.35EkmanNeo Lindén: 176 passningar, xT 0.37LindénJerry Essombe Mambingo: 133 passningar, xT 0.08MambingoRasmus Andersson: 133 passningar, xT 0.42AnderssonSimon Wagnsson: 124 passningar, xT 0.11WagnssonFredrick Udoh Godwin: 118 passningar, xT 0.1GodwinMusa Njie: 72 passningar, xT 0.72NjiePontus Eriksson: 66 passningar, xT 0.3ErikssonIsak Johansson: 64 passningar, xT 0.3JohanssonSam Forsman: 57 passningar, xT 1.89ForsmanSteve Zishim Bawa: 55 passningar, xT -0.13Bawa
    Assyriska FF
    Elias Ländin Sjöblom: 194 passningar, xT 1.55SjöblomKevin Jarrett: 188 passningar, xT 0.22JarrettSebastian Wändin: 181 passningar, xT 0.23WändinVictor Åsberg: 173 passningar, xT 0.71ÅsbergAmadou Kalabane: 172 passningar, xT 0.2KalabaneSamuel Uddenberg Edgren: 159 passningar, xT 0.48EdgrenFelix Felder Aaltonen: 143 passningar, xT 2.8AaltonenLiam Tahwildaran: 131 passningar, xT 0.38TahwildaranMartín Ignacio Larraín Guzmán: 81 passningar, xT 1.07GuzmánMartin Haddad: 54 passningar, xT 0.19HaddadViktor Widerberg: 52 passningar, xT 0.16Widerberg

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceUmeå FCAssyriska FF
    Points3535
    xPoints3837.3
    xG per match1.61.3
    xGA per match1.61.3
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.280.25
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.250.2
    Playing styleUmeå FCAssyriska FF
    Build-up efficiency0.330.38
    Field tilt0.40.42
    xT per match1.31.5
    xTA per match1.51.6
    Won balls, offensive half2726
    Pressing intensity0.450.46
    Pressing efficiency0.270.24
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.280.26
    Entries into the box per match1313
    Entries into the box against1613
    Pass completion %0.780.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.72
    Passes per match311302
    Passes against per match362399
    Switches of play per match17.316.6
    Long balls per match3033
    Set piecesUmeå FCAssyriska FF
    xG from free kicks0.170.12
    Corners per match5.74.8
    Corners against per match5.74.8
    xG per corner0.060.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.250.44
    First touch, defensive corners %0.50.72
    OtherUmeå FCAssyriska FF
    Throw-in control0.570.56
    The goalkeepersPontus Eriksson (Umeå FC)Kingdom Osayi (Assyriska FF)
    Saves6271
    Save %68%68%
    xG prevented47%41%
    Claims79 (93%)120 (89%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Umeå FC vs Assyriska FF according to our model?

    The model gives Assyriska FF a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Umeå FC 36%, draw 25%, Assyriska FF 39%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 64% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Umeå FC vs Assyriska FF?

    The model expects 1.65 goals (xG) for Umeå FC and 1.54 for Assyriska FF, 3.19 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Umeå FC or draw (1X) 61%, Assyriska FF or draw (X2) 64% and no draw (12) 75%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.