01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Ankara Keçiörengücü to win55%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Turkish 1. Lig
Läs på svenska
VansporPossession control
Ankara KeçiörengücüPossession controlOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Head-to-head records can often give insights, but with fewer than six matches between Vanspor and Ankara Keçiörengücü, it's their current form and expected goals that catch the eye for this clash. The visitors come into the game riding an unbeaten streak over five league matches, a testament to their consistency. Meanwhile, Vanspor has struggled to find their footing, as reflected in both their points tally and expected goals.
Vanspor's possession-control style hasn't translated into dominance on the scoreboard. Their xG per match stands at a modest 1.0, while they concede 1.6 xGA per game. This imbalance is likely to be exploited by an Ankara side that mirrors their possession approach but with notably more efficiency. The visitors boast an xG of 1.8 per match, indicating a well-oiled offensive machine that could prove too much for the hosts to handle.
The model's probabilities, which give Ankara a 55% chance to win, align with their on-paper superiority. A 1-1 or 0-1 scoreline appears most likely, but the underlying numbers point towards a 1-2 outcome as a strong possibility. The expectation of goals is marginally above average, with a 54% chance of over 2.5 goals, suggesting that the prudent play involves expecting a few goals without going overboard.
With Bet365 offering odds of 2.00 for Ankara Keçiörengücü to win, the value lies in backing the visitors. While it's no guarantee, the combination of form, xG superiority, and model probabilities make this an attractive proposition for those looking to capitalize on market inefficiencies.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Vanspor | Ankara Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 11 |
| xPoints | 7.2 | 11.6 |
| xG per match | 1 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.17 |
| Playing style | Vanspor | Ankara Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.35 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 0.68 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 0.9 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 280 | 306 |
| Passes against per match | 418 | 396 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.9 | 26.1 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 40 |
| Set pieces | Vanspor | Ankara Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 3.7 | 4 |
| Corners against per match | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.42 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.56 |
| Other | Vanspor | Ankara Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.64 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | Naby Oulare (Vanspor) | Emre Satilmis (Ankara Keçiörengücü) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 12 |
| Save % | 100% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 36% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Ankara Keçiörengücü a 55% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Vanspor 22%, draw 23%, Ankara Keçiörengücü 55%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.