01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Amedspor or draw (X2)74%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
Süper Lig24°22 km/h
Läs på svenska
AmedsporPossession controlOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Amedspor's assertive possession style meets Kasımpaşa's more defensive, direct approach, setting up a compelling tactical battle. The model's figures suggest Amedspor has a firm edge, with a 40% probability of victory versus the hosts' 31%. This clash of styles is underscored by Amed's superior expected goals tally of 1.43 to Kasımpaşa's 1.02, indicating that the visitors are better equipped to convert possession into chances.
Kasımpaşa's strategy hinges on absorbing pressure and striking on the counter. However, Amed's robust defense, conceding just 0.74 expected goals per match compared to Kasımpaşa's 0.96, suggests that the hosts might struggle to exploit this plan effectively. The numbers further indicate Amed's slight superiority in both actual and expected points, suggesting their form is a bit sharper.
While the head-to-head record between Kasımpaşa and Amed is too limited to weigh heavily, the most probable scorelines lean towards either a 1-1 draw or a 0-1 away victory. The game's expected goals lean towards a relatively tight contest, with a 44% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 49% probability of both sides scoring. Such figures suggest a cautious affair, likely to be decided by a single goal.
For those seeking value, the odds favoring Amed at 2.98 present a significant opportunity. Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet all offer this price, reflecting a 19% edge based on the model's 40% victory probability for Amed. This value opportunity frames Amedspor as a compelling pick to edge out Kasımpaşa in a closely contested match.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Kasımpaşa | X | 2 · Amedspor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.15 | 3.30 | EV+ 28% 3.20 |
| Betfair Exchange | 2.18 | 1.10 | EV+ 36% 3.40 |
| Betsafe | 2.52 | 3.10 | EV+ 13% 2.82 |
| Betsson | 2.52 | 3.10 | EV+ 13% 2.82 |
| Nordicbet | 2.52 | 3.10 | EV+ 13% 2.82 |
| Pinnacle | 2.62 | 3.18 | EV+ 18% 2.94 |
Odds updated 6 Sept, 11:36
2.42 → 2.62
3.29 → 3.18
2.97 → 2.94
2.16 → 2.26
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 06/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Kasımpaşa | Amedspor |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 6 |
| xPoints | 5.5 | 5.8 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 0.96 | 0.74 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.09 | 0.23 |
| Playing style | Kasımpaşa | Amedspor |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.24 | 0.44 |
| xT per match | 0.65 | 0.72 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 0.53 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 6 | 9 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 6 |
| Pass completion % | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 250 | 343 |
| Passes against per match | 566 | 379 |
| Switches of play per match | 22 | 18.6 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 22 |
| Set pieces | Kasımpaşa | Amedspor |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.21 |
| Corners per match | 2 | 4.2 |
| Corners against per match | 7.5 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.31 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.64 | 0.82 |
| Other | Kasımpaşa | Amedspor |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Andreas Gianniotis (Kasımpaşa) | Alban-Marc Lafont (Amedspor) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 6 |
| Save % | 80% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 80% | 49% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Amedspor a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Kasımpaşa 31%, draw 29%, Amedspor 40%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.