01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Jong AZ to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
Eerste Divisie20°9,0 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
The odds “at odds of 1.80 from Bet365” are not supported by the given facts and appear fabricated. Removing that unsupported detail:
With a 48% win probability, Jong AZ enters the clash as the slight favorite despite MVV Maastricht's impressive run of three consecutive victories. The model suggests a 2-1 scoreline for the hosts at a 10% probability, aligning with a high expected goals count of 2.03 for Jong AZ. However, the visitors' recent form cannot be ignored, as they hold an edge in both points and xPoints, indicating a more efficient conversion of chances.
Both teams prioritize possession, but Jong AZ's high press might be blunted by predicted rainfall of 10.8 mm, potentially slowing the game’s tempo and suppressing goal events. This factor is already accounted for in the model, which still gives a 65% chance for over 2.5 goals, marked by a robust 64% for both teams to find the net. Head-to-head data since 2023 shows a slight advantage for the hosts, albeit from a small sample size of four matches, which carries less weight compared to current form metrics.
The sharpest angle here is the over 2.5 goals market, supported by a strong model probability. Despite weather concerns, the attacking profiles and expected goals suggest value in this play. A tight 2-1 win for Jong AZ seems the most plausible outcome.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Jong AZ | X | 2 · MVV Maastricht |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.75 | 3.60 | 3.70 |
| Betsson | 1.75 | 3.60 | 3.70 |
| Nordicbet | 1.75 | 3.60 | 3.70 |
Odds updated 28 Aug, 07:37
1.75 → 1.75
3.60 → 3.60
3.70 → 3.70
Betsson · 4 recorded price levels · 27/08/2026 → 28/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Jong AZ | MVV Maastricht |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 9 |
| xPoints | 4.5 | 5 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.06 | 0.29 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| Playing style | Jong AZ | MVV Maastricht |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.53 | 0.55 |
| xT per match | 1 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.87 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.2 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 376 | 363 |
| Passes against per match | 368 | 313 |
| Switches of play per match | 24 | 35.6 |
| Long balls per match | 46 | 48 |
| Set pieces | Jong AZ | MVV Maastricht |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.7 | 3.3 |
| Corners against per match | 4.1 | 4.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.1 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.36 | 0.31 |
| Other | Jong AZ | MVV Maastricht |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.85 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Kiyani Zeggen (Jong AZ) | Hugo Wentges (MVV Maastricht) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 5 |
| Save % | 57% | 71% |
| xG prevented | 48% | 66% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Jong AZ a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Jong AZ 48%, draw 26%, MVV Maastricht 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 65% and under at 35%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 64% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.