Eerste Divisie15°15 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    DordrechtDordrechtPossession control
    vs
    Almere CityAlmere CityLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 2 · Almere City (50%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.95 (+20 %)

    Dordrecht vs Almere City · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Dordrecht 26%X 23%50% Almere City · 2

    Analysis: DordrechtAlmere City

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    TEXT:

    Dordrecht's possession-based approach will clash against the direct style of Almere City FC, and this contrast is central to predicting the flow of the game. The visitors thrive on a low defensive block, aiming to exploit transitions with rapid counter-attacks. Meanwhile, Dordrecht will seek to dominate the ball, though their recent form—a streak of four consecutive losses—suggests vulnerability when possession doesn't translate into concrete chances.

    Despite Dordrecht's struggles, there's a slight anomaly in their underlying numbers. Their xPoints of 5.9 slightly outstrip the visitors’ 5.7, indicating they've perhaps been a touch unlucky in converting control into results. Yet, Almere City FC's higher xG per match, sitting at 1.6 compared to Dordrecht's 1.1, underscores the visitors' efficiency in creating goal-scoring opportunities, reinforcing why they stand at 9 points in the current season versus Dordrecht's 4.

    Defensive frailty haunts the hosts, evidenced by their alarming xGA of 2.0. Almere City FC shows more resilience with an xGA of 1.6, giving them the edge in resisting opposition attacks. This defensive solidity, combined with their lethal counter-attacks, aligns with the model's probabilities favoring the visitors at 50%. While the most likely scoreline remains a 1-1 draw at 11%, both the 1-2 and 2-1 outcomes are not far behind, hinting at a potentially narrow victory for the visitors.

    In betting terms, the over 2.5 goals market at 59% aligns well with these dynamics, suggesting a game where goals will not be scarce, especially given the high probability of both teams finding the net. Expect Almere City FC to capitalize on Dordrecht's defensive lapses, with a 2-1 away win a plausible scenario.

    DordrechtDordrecht
    Form DLLLL
    League ranking xG #19xGA #20xT #12xP/match #20Points #18
    Key players
    • Ayoub OuarghiCAMxG 0.25 · xT 0.11
    • Sem ValkCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.03
    • Martin VetkalFxG 0.17 · xT 0.03
    Almere CityAlmere City
    Form WWWL
    League ranking xG #9xGA #13xT #8xP/match #9Points #11
    Key players
    • Emanuel PokuFxG 0.17 · xT 0.20
    • Ferdy DruijfFxG 0.70 · xT 0.16
    • Enzo CornelisseCAMxG 0.12 · xT 0.30

    Match prediction: DordrechtAlmere City

    Predicted score matrix

    Almere City
    Dordrecht
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.0%
    0–17.3%
    0–26.3%
    0–33.5%
    0–4+2.1%
    1
    1–06.3%
    1–111.2%
    1–29.0%
    1–34.9%
    1–4+2.9%
    2
    2–04.7%
    2–17.7%
    2–26.4%
    2–33.5%
    2–4+2.1%
    3
    3–02.2%
    3–13.7%
    3–23.0%
    3–31.7%
    3–4+1.0%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.8%
    4+–21.5%
    4+–30.8%
    4+–4+0.5%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.2-18%
    4. 4.0-17%
    5. 5.2-26%
    Expected goals
    1,421,65
    Both teams to score
    62%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,1
    Under 2,541%
    @2.95EV+20%
    Over 2,559%
    @1.37

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Almere City to win50%
    • Over 1.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    35%

    Fair odds

    2.84

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Almere City to win50%
    • Over 2.5 goals59%
    • Ferdy Druijf to score20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score62%
    • Over 2.5 goals59%
    • Dario Šits to score21%
    • Mees Hoedemakers to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.541% probability@2.95BetsafeEV+20%reference odds
    • Under 2.541% probability@2.95BetssonEV+20%reference odds
    • Under 2.541% probability@2.95NordicbetEV+20%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · DordrechtX2 · Almere City
    Betsafe2.953.60
    EV+ 6%
    2.12
    Betsson2.953.60
    EV+ 6%
    2.12
    Nordicbet2.953.60
    EV+ 6%
    2.12

    Odds updated 19 Sept, 13:37

    Odds movement

    1-3 %
    33 %28 %

    3.052.95

    X-6 %
    27 %22 %

    3.853.60

    2+5 %
    47 %42 %

    2.022.12

    Over 2,50 %
    71 %66 %

    1.371.37

    Betsson · 2 recorded price levels · 18/09/2026 → 19/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Dordrecht have lost 4 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Dordrecht
    Almere City
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Dordrecht (918)
    Almere City (103)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Dordrecht
    Jaden Pinas: 216 passningar, xT 0.14PinasCalvin Owen Harm Raatsie: 196 passningar, xT 0.25RaatsieSenne Vugts: 167 passningar, xT 0.65VugtsAdil Lechkar: 139 passningar, xT 0.3LechkarJurre Van Aken: 133 passningar, xT 0.78AkenAyoub Ouarghi: 133 passningar, xT 0.31OuarghiBeni Christophe Mpanzu: 103 passningar, xT 1.1MpanzuStan Henderikx: 99 passningar, xT 0.19HenderikxNick Venema: 88 passningar, xT 0.85VenemaLucas Woudenberg: 81 passningar, xT 0.15WoudenbergYannis M'Bemba: 74 passningar, xT 0.09M'Bemba
    Almere City
    Teun Bijleveld: 107 passningar, xT 0.24BijleveldWessel Speel: 104 passningar, xT 0.19SpeelJoey Jacobs: 101 passningar, xT 0.19JacobsJames Lawrence: 101 passningar, xT 0.14LawrenceEnzo Cornelisse: 77 passningar, xT 1.01CornelisseEmmanuel van de Blaak: 73 passningar, xT 0.07BlaakMees Hoedemakers: 68 passningar, xT 0.17HoedemakersHamza El Dahri: 54 passningar, xT 0.24DahriDamian van Bruggen: 53 passningar, xT 0BruggenMarley Dors: 50 passningar, xT 0.6DorsFerdy Druijf: 40 passningar, xT 0.16Druijf
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Dordrecht
    Jaden Pinas: 216 passningar, xT 0.14PinasCalvin Owen Harm Raatsie: 196 passningar, xT 0.25RaatsieSenne Vugts: 167 passningar, xT 0.65VugtsAdil Lechkar: 139 passningar, xT 0.3LechkarJurre Van Aken: 133 passningar, xT 0.78AkenAyoub Ouarghi: 133 passningar, xT 0.31OuarghiBeni Christophe Mpanzu: 103 passningar, xT 1.1MpanzuStan Henderikx: 99 passningar, xT 0.19HenderikxNick Venema: 88 passningar, xT 0.85VenemaLucas Woudenberg: 81 passningar, xT 0.15WoudenbergYannis M'Bemba: 74 passningar, xT 0.09M'Bemba
    Almere City
    Teun Bijleveld: 107 passningar, xT 0.24BijleveldWessel Speel: 104 passningar, xT 0.19SpeelJoey Jacobs: 101 passningar, xT 0.19JacobsJames Lawrence: 101 passningar, xT 0.14LawrenceEnzo Cornelisse: 77 passningar, xT 1.01CornelisseEmmanuel van de Blaak: 73 passningar, xT 0.07BlaakMees Hoedemakers: 68 passningar, xT 0.17HoedemakersHamza El Dahri: 54 passningar, xT 0.24DahriDamian van Bruggen: 53 passningar, xT 0BruggenMarley Dors: 50 passningar, xT 0.6DorsFerdy Druijf: 40 passningar, xT 0.16Druijf

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceDordrechtAlmere City
    Points49
    xPoints5.95.7
    xG per match1.11.6
    xGA per match21.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.190.14
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.340.16
    Playing styleDordrechtAlmere City
    Build-up efficiency0.310.29
    Field tilt0.520.36
    xT per match1.11.4
    xTA per match0.961.1
    Won balls, offensive half2524
    Pressing intensity0.240.25
    Pressing efficiency0.310.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.2
    Entries into the box per match1213
    Entries into the box against1514
    Pass completion %0.760.7
    Pass completion % under pressure0.690.63
    Passes per match358249
    Passes against per match301395
    Switches of play per match26.221.2
    Long balls per match4738
    Set piecesDordrechtAlmere City
    xG from free kicks0.060.06
    Corners per match55.2
    Corners against per match4.26.7
    xG per corner0.020.03
    xGA per corner against0.010.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.480.44
    OtherDordrechtAlmere City
    Throw-in control0.750.72
    The goalkeepersCalvin Owen Harm Raatsie (Dordrecht)Wessel Speel (Almere City)
    Saves2618
    Save %61%86%
    xG prevented37%76%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Dordrecht vs Almere City according to our model?

    The model gives Almere City a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Dordrecht 26%, draw 23%, Almere City 50%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.