Eerste Divisie25°11 km/hUpdated

    Läs på svenska
    Helmond SportHelmond SportPossession control
    vs
    The model's lean: 2 · De Graafschap (46%)
    De GraafschapDe GraafschapPossession control

    Helmond SportDe Graafschap · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Helmond Sport 30%X 24%46% De Graafschap · 2
    Helmond SportHelmond Sport
    Form LDDWL
    League ranking xG #18xGA #11xT #18xP/match #17Points #18
    Key players
    • Amine Et-TaïbiRBxG 0.07 · xT 0.14
    • Maik LukowiczFxG 0.46 · xT 0.03
    • Noah Ernest Makanza MbelebaFxG 0.09 · xT 0.05
    De GraafschapDe Graafschap
    Form DWDWL
    League ranking xG #2xGA #12xT #3xP/match #10Points #4
    Key players
    • Bouke BoersmaFxG 0.59 · xT 0.03
    • Nils EggensFxG 0.48 · xT 0.04
    • Ibrahim El KadiriLWxG 0.17 · xT 0.34

    Match prediction: Helmond SportDe Graafschap

    Predicted score matrix

    De Graafschap
    Helmond Sport
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.2%
    0–16.7%
    0–26.1%
    0–33.6%
    0–4+2.4%
    1
    1–05.5%
    1–110.5%
    1–29.0%
    1–35.3%
    1–4+3.5%
    2
    2–04.3%
    2–17.5%
    2–26.6%
    2–33.9%
    2–4+2.5%
    3
    3–02.1%
    3–13.7%
    3–23.2%
    3–31.9%
    3–4+1.2%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.9%
    4+–21.7%
    4+–31.0%
    4+–4+0.6%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.2-18%
    4. 4.0-17%
    5. 5.2-27%
    Expected goals
    1,471,76
    Both teams to score
    64%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,2
    Under 2,537%
    Over 2,563%

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Analysis: Helmond SportDe Graafschap

    Oscar Nilsson · · How the predictions work

    Thirty-nine points for Helmond Sport, sixty-three for De Graafschap. That gap tells a story even before a ball is kicked. De Graafschap have been the more consistent side in the Eerste Divisie, but this is not a foregone conclusion. Helmond Sport's penchant for retaining possession means they won't easily roll over, though their xG tally of 1.1 per match is less than inspiring when stacked against De Graafschap's more robust 1.8.

    De Graafschap edges the head-to-head record since 2023, with two wins to Helmond Sport's one, illustrating a slight historical advantage. Yet, Helmond Sport's single victory shouldn't be underestimated, especially given their capability to control the ball. They aren't easily overwhelmed, and a capacity to disrupt De Graafschap's rhythm could keep this clash competitive.

    Helmond Sport enters with a slight advantage in expected goals against (xGA), both teams letting in an average of 1.5 goals per match. This statistic might offer a glimmer of hope for Helmond Sport fans expecting a resolute defensive display. However, with expected goals per match favoring De Graafschap at 1.76 to Helmond's 1.47, the visitors hold the potential to outscore their hosts if they hit their stride.

    The odds lean towards De Graafschap, with a 46% chance of victory according to model probabilities. The most likely scoreline whispers a 1-1 draw at 11%, but the 1-2 outcome at 9% feels like the more compelling option. Goals seem likely, with a hefty 63% probability for over 2.5 goals and both teams to score marked at 64%.

    For those with betting slips lined up, backing over 2.5 goals at odds of 1.80 with Bet365 offers value, as the percentages suggest a goal-fest is more probable than not. If De Graafschap's attack finds its rhythm, this could well be a rewarding afternoon for those chasing goals.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Helmond Sport 1Draw 1De Graafschap 2
    Goals: 59 (⌀ 3,5)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Helmond Sport
    De Graafschap
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Helmond Sport (4262)
    De Graafschap (7458)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Helmond Sport
    Alen Dizdarevic: 300 passningar, xT 0.21DizdarevicDennis Vos: 299 passningar, xT 0.42VosFlor Van Den Eynden: 280 passningar, xT 0.42EyndenAmir Absalem: 237 passningar, xT 1AbsalemPol Llonch: 227 passningar, xT 0.37LlonchSem Dekkers: 206 passningar, xT 0.2DekkersLennerd Daneels: 154 passningar, xT 0.24DaneelsMenno Bergsen: 97 passningar, xT 0.06BergsenNoah Ernest Makanza Mbeleba: 88 passningar, xT 0.05MbelebaOnesime Zimuangana: 65 passningar, xT 1.04ZimuanganaBrian Koglin: 62 passningar, xT 0.03Koglin
    De Graafschap
    Thomas Petrus Johannes Kok: 242 passningar, xT 0.08KokRowan Besselink: 202 passningar, xT 0.11BesselinkTies Wieggers: 199 passningar, xT 0.1WieggersNolan Martens: 154 passningar, xT 0.58MartensTeun Gijselhart: 142 passningar, xT 0.27GijselhartFedde de Jong: 118 passningar, xT 0.4JongKaya Symons: 112 passningar, xT 0.23SymonsStijn Bultman: 96 passningar, xT 0.09BultmanLevi Schoppema: 94 passningar, xT 0.59SchoppemaJason Meerstadt: 90 passningar, xT 0.02MeerstadtReuven Niemeijer: 77 passningar, xT 0.81Niemeijer
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Helmond Sport
    Alen Dizdarevic: 300 passningar, xT 0.21DizdarevicDennis Vos: 299 passningar, xT 0.42VosFlor Van Den Eynden: 280 passningar, xT 0.42EyndenAmir Absalem: 237 passningar, xT 1AbsalemPol Llonch: 227 passningar, xT 0.37LlonchSem Dekkers: 206 passningar, xT 0.2DekkersLennerd Daneels: 154 passningar, xT 0.24DaneelsMenno Bergsen: 97 passningar, xT 0.06BergsenNoah Ernest Makanza Mbeleba: 88 passningar, xT 0.05MbelebaOnesime Zimuangana: 65 passningar, xT 1.04ZimuanganaBrian Koglin: 62 passningar, xT 0.03Koglin
    De Graafschap
    Thomas Petrus Johannes Kok: 242 passningar, xT 0.08KokRowan Besselink: 202 passningar, xT 0.11BesselinkTies Wieggers: 199 passningar, xT 0.1WieggersNolan Martens: 154 passningar, xT 0.58MartensTeun Gijselhart: 142 passningar, xT 0.27GijselhartFedde de Jong: 118 passningar, xT 0.4JongKaya Symons: 112 passningar, xT 0.23SymonsStijn Bultman: 96 passningar, xT 0.09BultmanLevi Schoppema: 94 passningar, xT 0.59SchoppemaJason Meerstadt: 90 passningar, xT 0.02MeerstadtReuven Niemeijer: 77 passningar, xT 0.81Niemeijer

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceHelmond SportDe Graafschap
    Points3963
    xPoints48.553.5
    xG per match1.11.8
    xGA per match1.51.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.20.25
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.240.23
    Playing styleHelmond SportDe Graafschap
    Build-up efficiency0.30.32
    Field tilt0.450.51
    xT per match0.851.3
    xTA per match11.1
    Won balls, offensive half2225
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.270.32
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.30.35
    Entries into the box per match1114
    Entries into the box against1314
    Pass completion %0.760.77
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.72
    Passes per match339377
    Passes against per match363281
    Switches of play per match23.532.5
    Long balls per match3740
    Set piecesHelmond SportDe Graafschap
    xG from free kicks0.020.08
    Corners per match5.96.5
    Corners against per match4.95.7
    xG per corner0.030.04
    xGA per corner against0.050.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.340.4
    First touch, defensive corners %0.580.58
    OtherHelmond SportDe Graafschap
    Throw-in control0.730.76
    The goalkeepersMenno Bergsen (Helmond Sport)Ties Wieggers (De Graafschap)
    Saves93141
    Save %62%71%
    xG prevented48%55%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Helmond Sport vs De Graafschap according to our model?

    The model gives De Graafschap a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Helmond Sport 30%, draw 24%, De Graafschap 46%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 64% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.