01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Jong Utrecht or draw (X2)65%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Eerste Divisie23°17 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Utrecht U21, with an edge in xPoints and a penchant for possession play, steps onto the pitch against MVV Maastricht carrying the favourite tag, albeit a subtle one. The model gives them a 40% chance of securing a victory, a slight but telling advantage over MVV's 36%. While both squads have their strengths, the expected goals tell a tale of Utrecht U21's offensive superiority: 1.5 xG per match compared to MVV's 1.0. This is a significant gap, and with MVV's leaky defense—conceding an average of 1.9 xGA per match—Utrecht U21's attacking prowess could well exploit it.
MVV Maastricht's direct style might not be enough to unsettle a Utrecht U21 side that prefers to control the game through possession. In recent head-to-heads, albeit a small sample, Utrecht U21 has had the upper hand, winning two out of four encounters. While MVV did manage a win and a draw, their inconsistency is mirrored in their overall points tally for the season, where they trail by eight points.
Utrecht U21’s slight edge in expected goals and xPoints translates into a model leaning towards a 1-1 or a 1-2 scoreline. The probabilities for these outcomes sit at 12% and 9% respectively. With a 52% chance of over 2.5 goals, the betting lean nudges slightly over, although caution is advised. MVV’s low defensive setup could potentially stifle the goal flow, but given Utrecht U21's higher expected goals, it would require a particularly disciplined performance from the hosts.
The sharpest angle here is the value in backing Utrecht U21 outright. The bookmaker BetSmart has them at odds of 2.75, presenting value (EV+) for those wanting to side with the model's lean. This isn't a promise of profit but rather an evidence-based nod towards where the numbers suggest real potential lies.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | MVV Maastricht | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 38 | 46 |
| xPoints | 38.3 | 56.5 |
| xG per match | 1 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.9 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.25 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.28 | 0.16 |
| Playing style | MVV Maastricht | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.41 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 1 | 0.9 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 314 | 325 |
| Passes against per match | 421 | 365 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.8 | 23.6 |
| Long balls per match | 34 | 34 |
| Set pieces | MVV Maastricht | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 4 | 4.3 |
| Corners against per match | 6.6 | 5.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.54 | 0.61 |
| Other | MVV Maastricht | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Sem Westerveld (MVV Maastricht) | Kevin Gadellaa (Jong Utrecht) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 157 | 78 |
| Save % | 69% | 66% |
| xG prevented | 46% | 42% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Jong Utrecht a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: MVV Maastricht 36%, draw 24%, Jong Utrecht 40%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.