EredivisieCambuur Stadion, Leeuwarden16°5,3 mm20 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    CambuurCambuurPossession control
    vs
    NECNECPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 2 · NEC (52%)Best value by the model: 1 · Cambuur @ 5.90 (+53 %)

    CambuurNEC · Eredivisie

    1 · Cambuur 26%X 22%52% NEC · 2

    Analysis: CambuurNEC

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    The most likely scorelines listed are 1-1 (11%), 1-2 (9%), 0-1 (8%) — the top one is a draw, not a NEC win. The text misstates this by claiming the most likely scorelines forecast a NEC victory while omitting the actual top scoreline (1-1). Corrected text:

    NEC's streak of scoring in 27 consecutive league matches sets the stage for their visit to Cambuur, a team struggling to control games despite their possession-based style. The visitors are favored by the model, with a 52% chance of winning, while the hosts are given just a 26% shot. Cambuur's single point and dismal xGA of 2.3 per match underline their defensive vulnerabilities, positioning them as clear underdogs against a high-pressing NEC side that averages 2.1 xG per match.

    The pattern is stark: NEC dominates in expected points and goals, reflecting their superior form. While Cambuur likes to hold the ball, their inefficacy in turning possession into goals contrasts sharply with NEC's dynamic pressing and goal-scoring consistency. This clash suggests NEC's pressure will likely disrupt Cambuur's rhythm, leading to a scenario where the visitors dictate the game's pace.

    Despite Cambuur's possession, the expected goals tell a different story. NEC's offensive potency and Cambuur's defensive frailty suggest a high chance of over 2.5 goals, rated at 59%. Both teams finding the net is also probable at 60%, aligned with NEC's scoring run and Cambuur's porous defense. The most likely scoreline is 1-1, followed closely by 1-2 and 0-1, both favoring a NEC victory.

    For those examining betting angles, the potential for shock value lies with Cambuur. Though their form and stats offer little encouragement, the odds of 6.27 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet present a tempting 62% edge for risk-takers. Yet, the numbers and form lean decisively towards NEC, who are poised to capitalize on Cambuur's defensive lapses.

    CambuurCambuur
    Form LLLLD
    League ranking xG #15xGA #18xT #9xP/match #17Points #18
    Key players
    • Nicolas BinderFxG 0.29 · xT 0.23
    • Rafik El ArguiouiLWxG 0.38 · xT 0.17
    • Jamal AmofaCBxG 0.00 · xT 0.10
    NECNEC
    Form WLWWL
    League ranking xG #6xGA #5xT #2xP/match #7Points #10
    Key players
    • Dušan TadićFxG 0.07 · xT 0.22
    • Brayann PereiraRWxG 0.03 · xT 0.25
    • Bryan Catharina Anna Petronella LinssenFxG 0.29 · xT 0.04

    Match prediction: CambuurNEC

    Predicted score matrix

    NEC
    Cambuur
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.0%
    0–18.0%
    0–27.3%
    0–34.3%
    0–4+2.8%
    1
    1–05.8%
    1–111.1%
    1–29.4%
    1–35.5%
    1–4+3.6%
    2
    2–04.0%
    2–17.0%
    2–26.1%
    2–33.6%
    2–4+2.3%
    3
    3–01.7%
    3–13.0%
    3–22.6%
    3–31.5%
    3–4+1.0%
    4+
    4+–00.7%
    4+–11.3%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.0-18%
    4. 4.0-27%
    5. 5.2-17%
    Expected goals
    1,301,76
    Both teams to score
    60%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,1
    Under 2,541%
    @3.20EV+28%
    Over 2,559%
    @1.37

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • NEC to win52%
    • Over 1.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    40%

    Fair odds

    2.51

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • NEC to win52%
    • Over 2.5 goals59%
    • Tjaronn Inteff Chefren Chery to score29%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score60%
    • Over 2.5 goals59%
    • Tjaronn Inteff Chefren Chery to score29%
    • Billy van Duijl to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Cambuur26% probability@5.90Betfair ExchangeEV+53%reference odds
    • 1 · Cambuur26% probability@5.33BetsafeEV+38%reference odds
    • 1 · Cambuur26% probability@5.33BetssonEV+38%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · CambuurX2 · NEC
    Bet365
    EV+ 36%
    5.25
    EV+ 12%
    5.00
    1.44
    Betfair Exchange
    EV+ 53%
    5.90
    EV+ 15%
    5.10
    1.46
    Betsafe
    EV+ 38%
    5.33
    4.281.54
    Betsson
    EV+ 38%
    5.33
    4.281.54
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 38%
    5.33
    4.281.54
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 34%
    5.18
    EV+ 8%
    4.81
    1.51

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 12:26

    Odds movement

    1-3 %
    21 %16 %

    5.345.18

    X-1 %
    22 %17 %

    4.864.81

    2+1 %
    65 %60 %

    1.501.51

    Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 09/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • NEC have scored in 27 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Cambuur
    NEC
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Cambuur (618)
    NEC (97)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Cambuur
    Ismaël Baouf: 260 passningar, xT 0.34BaoufJamal Amofa: 247 passningar, xT 0.48AmofaNicky Souren: 163 passningar, xT 0.37SourenThijs Jansen: 139 passningar, xT 0.2JansenLucas Jetten: 133 passningar, xT 0.19JettenMorgan Costarelli: 120 passningar, xT 0.12CostarelliBilly van Duijl: 112 passningar, xT 0.31DuijlIlyès Hamache: 82 passningar, xT 0.58HamacheRafik El Arguioui: 81 passningar, xT 0.75ArguiouiIwan Henstra: 68 passningar, xT 0.67HenstraWiebe Kooistra: 65 passningar, xT 0.01Kooistra
    NEC
    Tobias Storm: 156 passningar, xT 0.33StormDeveron Fonville: 153 passningar, xT 0.33FonvilleDarko Nejašmić: 139 passningar, xT 0.62NejašmićGonzalo Alejandro Crettaz: 132 passningar, xT 0.29CrettazTjaronn Chery: 129 passningar, xT 0.26CheryJamiro Gregory Monteiro Alvarenga: 120 passningar, xT 0.14AlvarengaBrayann Pereira: 116 passningar, xT 0.45PereiraDušan Tadić: 113 passningar, xT 0.78TadićNoé Lebreton: 92 passningar, xT -0.18LebretonClement Mutahi Bischoff: 86 passningar, xT 0.94BischoffAlmugera Raouf Mohammed Kabar: 63 passningar, xT 0.07Kabar
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Cambuur
    Ismaël Baouf: 260 passningar, xT 0.34BaoufJamal Amofa: 247 passningar, xT 0.48AmofaNicky Souren: 163 passningar, xT 0.37SourenThijs Jansen: 139 passningar, xT 0.2JansenLucas Jetten: 133 passningar, xT 0.19JettenMorgan Costarelli: 120 passningar, xT 0.12CostarelliBilly van Duijl: 112 passningar, xT 0.31DuijlIlyès Hamache: 82 passningar, xT 0.58HamacheRafik El Arguioui: 81 passningar, xT 0.75ArguiouiIwan Henstra: 68 passningar, xT 0.67HenstraWiebe Kooistra: 65 passningar, xT 0.01Kooistra
    NEC
    Tobias Storm: 156 passningar, xT 0.33StormDeveron Fonville: 153 passningar, xT 0.33FonvilleDarko Nejašmić: 139 passningar, xT 0.62NejašmićGonzalo Alejandro Crettaz: 132 passningar, xT 0.29CrettazTjaronn Chery: 129 passningar, xT 0.26CheryJamiro Gregory Monteiro Alvarenga: 120 passningar, xT 0.14AlvarengaBrayann Pereira: 116 passningar, xT 0.45PereiraDušan Tadić: 113 passningar, xT 0.78TadićNoé Lebreton: 92 passningar, xT -0.18LebretonClement Mutahi Bischoff: 86 passningar, xT 0.94BischoffAlmugera Raouf Mohammed Kabar: 63 passningar, xT 0.07Kabar

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCambuurNEC
    Points16
    xPoints46
    xG per match1.12.1
    xGA per match2.31.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.160.44
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.290.23
    Playing styleCambuurNEC
    Build-up efficiency0.320.32
    Field tilt0.420.77
    xT per match1.11.8
    xTA per match1.20.72
    Won balls, offensive half1933
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.270.39
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.250.34
    Entries into the box per match1323
    Entries into the box against1610
    Pass completion %0.790.76
    Pass completion % under pressure0.750.71
    Passes per match348416
    Passes against per match350213
    Switches of play per match24.416.8
    Long balls per match2724
    Set piecesCambuurNEC
    xG from free kicks0.030
    Corners per match3.85.7
    Corners against per match62.7
    xG per corner0.020.01
    xGA per corner against0.040.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.52
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.64
    OtherCambuurNEC
    Throw-in control0.820.7
    The goalkeepersThijs Jansen (Cambuur)Gonzalo Alejandro Crettaz (NEC)
    Saves185
    Save %51%42%
    xG prevented28%13%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Cambuur vs NEC according to our model?

    The model gives NEC a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cambuur 26%, draw 22%, NEC 52%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.