01 · 2 legs
Safe
- NEC to win52%
- Over 1.5 goals81%
EredivisieCambuur Stadion, Leeuwarden16°5,3 mm20 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The most likely scorelines listed are 1-1 (11%), 1-2 (9%), 0-1 (8%) — the top one is a draw, not a NEC win. The text misstates this by claiming the most likely scorelines forecast a NEC victory while omitting the actual top scoreline (1-1). Corrected text:
NEC's streak of scoring in 27 consecutive league matches sets the stage for their visit to Cambuur, a team struggling to control games despite their possession-based style. The visitors are favored by the model, with a 52% chance of winning, while the hosts are given just a 26% shot. Cambuur's single point and dismal xGA of 2.3 per match underline their defensive vulnerabilities, positioning them as clear underdogs against a high-pressing NEC side that averages 2.1 xG per match.
The pattern is stark: NEC dominates in expected points and goals, reflecting their superior form. While Cambuur likes to hold the ball, their inefficacy in turning possession into goals contrasts sharply with NEC's dynamic pressing and goal-scoring consistency. This clash suggests NEC's pressure will likely disrupt Cambuur's rhythm, leading to a scenario where the visitors dictate the game's pace.
Despite Cambuur's possession, the expected goals tell a different story. NEC's offensive potency and Cambuur's defensive frailty suggest a high chance of over 2.5 goals, rated at 59%. Both teams finding the net is also probable at 60%, aligned with NEC's scoring run and Cambuur's porous defense. The most likely scoreline is 1-1, followed closely by 1-2 and 0-1, both favoring a NEC victory.
For those examining betting angles, the potential for shock value lies with Cambuur. Though their form and stats offer little encouragement, the odds of 6.27 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet present a tempting 62% edge for risk-takers. Yet, the numbers and form lean decisively towards NEC, who are poised to capitalize on Cambuur's defensive lapses.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cambuur | X | 2 · NEC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | EV+ 36% 5.25 | EV+ 12% 5.00 | 1.44 |
| Betfair Exchange | EV+ 53% 5.90 | EV+ 15% 5.10 | 1.46 |
| Betsafe | EV+ 38% 5.33 | 4.28 | 1.54 |
| Betsson | EV+ 38% 5.33 | 4.28 | 1.54 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 38% 5.33 | 4.28 | 1.54 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 34% 5.18 | EV+ 8% 4.81 | 1.51 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 12:26
5.34 → 5.18
4.86 → 4.81
1.50 → 1.51
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 09/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 6 |
| xPoints | 4 | 6 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| xGA per match | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.16 | 0.44 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.29 | 0.23 |
| Playing style | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.42 | 0.77 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.72 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 19 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.39 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 23 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 348 | 416 |
| Passes against per match | 350 | 213 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.4 | 16.8 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.8 | 5.7 |
| Corners against per match | 6 | 2.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.52 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.64 |
| Other | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.82 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Thijs Jansen (Cambuur) | Gonzalo Alejandro Crettaz (NEC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 18 | 5 |
| Save % | 51% | 42% |
| xG prevented | 28% | 13% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives NEC a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cambuur 26%, draw 22%, NEC 52%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.