EFL League TwoSt James Park, Exeter17°0,5 mm16 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Exeter CityExeter CityLow block & direct
    11
    BarnetBarnetBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 2 · Barnet (54%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.19 (+8 %)

    Exeter CityBarnet · EFL League Two

    1 · Exeter City 23%X 23%54% Barnet · 2

    Analysis: Exeter CityBarnet

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Barnet's unbeaten streak of 12 league matches stands out sharply against Exeter City's struggles. Despite Exeter's direct approach, their defence leaks, averaging 1.6 goals against per match. In contrast, Barnet boasts a solid backline with an xGA of just 0.98, suggesting they can handle Exeter's advances effectively.

    The model gives Barnet a 54% chance of victory, reflecting their balanced and physical style and consistent goal-scoring ability, having found the net in 13 consecutive league matches. The most likely outcomes are closely contested, with a 1-1 result at 12% and a 0-1 at 11%, but the scoring edge leans towards the visitors. Expected goals further bolster Barnet's case, at 1.67 against Exeter's 1.02, indicating a higher probability of the visitors securing the win.

    The sharpest angle here is the value on Barnet as the away side. With odds of 2.12 available at Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, there's a 15% edge over the implied probabilities. For punters focusing on pure value, backing Barnet at these odds aligns with the model's insights. Expect a tight match, but the scales tip in favor of the visitors, likely with a 0-1 or 1-2 final scoreline.

    Exeter CityExeter City
    Form LWL
    League ranking xG #8xGA #17xT #13xP/match #9Points #15
    Key players
    • Jayden WarehamFxG 0.90 · xT 0.00
    • Edward George Martin JamesRWxG 0.17 · xT 0.08
    • Jack Joseph FitzwaterCBxG 0.16 · xT 0.05
    BarnetBarnet
    Form WWWWD
    League ranking xG #4xGA #3xT #8xP/match #5Points #1
    Key players
    • Kabongo TshimangaFxG 0.50 · xT -0.06
    • Oisín Jack GallagherFxG 0.14 · xT 0.00
    • Thomas Andrew KnowlesFxG 0.33 · xT 0.07
    Final score
    11
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Exeter City 23% · Draw 23% · Barnet 54%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - BarnetBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 5,59fair 7,33-24 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - ExeterBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 10,75fair 19,38-45 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Exeter CityBarnet

    Predicted score matrix

    Barnet
    Exeter City
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.1%
    0–111.0%
    0–29.5%
    0–35.3%
    0–4+3.2%
    1
    1–06.6%
    1–111.9%
    1–29.7%
    1–35.4%
    1–4+3.3%
    2
    2–03.5%
    2–15.9%
    2–24.9%
    2–32.7%
    2–4+1.7%
    3
    3–01.2%
    3–12.0%
    3–21.7%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.6%
    4+
    4+–00.4%
    4+–10.6%
    4+–20.5%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.0-111%
    3. 3.1-210%
    4. 4.0-29%
    5. 5.0-07%
    Expected goals
    1,021,67
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    @2.19EV+5%
    Over 2,550%
    @1.70

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Barnet to win54%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    35%

    Fair odds

    2.83

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Barnet to win54%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Scott John High to score24%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score52%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Scott John High to score24%
    • Ethan Craig Brierley to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.550% probability@2.19PinnacleEV+8%reference odds
    • Under 2.550% probability@2.12BetsafeEV+5%reference odds
    • Under 2.550% probability@2.12BetssonEV+5%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Exeter CityX2 · Barnet
    Betsafe3.703.60
    EV+ 2%
    1.88
    Betsson3.703.60
    EV+ 2%
    1.88
    Nordicbet3.703.60
    EV+ 2%
    1.88
    Pinnacle3.653.97
    EV+ 3%
    1.91

    Odds updated 1 Sept, 10:35

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Barnet win since 30 August — the odds have shortened from 2.11 to 1.91 (−10%).

    1+20 %
    34 %24 %

    3.033.65

    X+4 %
    29 %19 %

    3.803.97

    2-10 %
    52 %42 %

    2.111.91

    Over 2,5+1 %
    61 %51 %

    1.681.70

    Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 01/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Barnet are unbeaten in their last 12 league matches.
    • Barnet have scored in 13 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Exeter City
    Barnet
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Exeter City (33)
    Barnet (84)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Exeter City
    Jack Joseph Fitzwater: 88 passningar, xT 0.14FitzwaterCharlie James Cummins: 72 passningar, xT 0.32CumminsEdward George Martin James: 64 passningar, xT 0.21JamesJack Thomas Bycroft: 58 passningar, xT 0.18BycroftReece Cole: 52 passningar, xT -0.05ColeLuca Woodhouse: 52 passningar, xT 0.08WoodhouseGwion Dafydd Rhys Edwards: 44 passningar, xT 0.51EdwardsEthan Sutherland: 39 passningar, xT 0.14SutherlandJake Billy Doyle-Hayes: 37 passningar, xT 0.03Doyle-HayesVincent Harper: 35 passningar, xT 0.07HarperTaylor Perry: 34 passningar, xT 0.08Perry
    Barnet
    Nikola Tavares: 81 passningar, xT 0.15TavaresJake Reeves: 74 passningar, xT 0.66ReevesNnamdi Ofoborh: 63 passningar, xT 0.23OfoborhDaniele James Collinge: 63 passningar, xT 0.38CollingeMatthew Aidan Cox: 55 passningar, xT 0.28CoxMyles Lewis George-Kenlock: 47 passningar, xT 0.17George-KenlockCharlie James Lakin: 45 passningar, xT 0.5LakinOisín Jack Gallagher: 45 passningar, xT 0GallagherAdam Nicholas Senior: 44 passningar, xT 0.33SeniorIdris Sheka Kanu: 43 passningar, xT 0.08KanuKabongo Tshimanga: 23 passningar, xT -0.19Tshimanga
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Exeter City
    Jack Joseph Fitzwater: 88 passningar, xT 0.14FitzwaterCharlie James Cummins: 72 passningar, xT 0.32CumminsEdward George Martin James: 64 passningar, xT 0.21JamesJack Thomas Bycroft: 58 passningar, xT 0.18BycroftReece Cole: 52 passningar, xT -0.05ColeLuca Woodhouse: 52 passningar, xT 0.08WoodhouseGwion Dafydd Rhys Edwards: 44 passningar, xT 0.51EdwardsEthan Sutherland: 39 passningar, xT 0.14SutherlandJake Billy Doyle-Hayes: 37 passningar, xT 0.03Doyle-HayesVincent Harper: 35 passningar, xT 0.07HarperTaylor Perry: 34 passningar, xT 0.08Perry
    Barnet
    Nikola Tavares: 81 passningar, xT 0.15TavaresJake Reeves: 74 passningar, xT 0.66ReevesNnamdi Ofoborh: 63 passningar, xT 0.23OfoborhDaniele James Collinge: 63 passningar, xT 0.38CollingeMatthew Aidan Cox: 55 passningar, xT 0.28CoxMyles Lewis George-Kenlock: 47 passningar, xT 0.17George-KenlockCharlie James Lakin: 45 passningar, xT 0.5LakinOisín Jack Gallagher: 45 passningar, xT 0GallagherAdam Nicholas Senior: 44 passningar, xT 0.33SeniorIdris Sheka Kanu: 43 passningar, xT 0.08KanuKabongo Tshimanga: 23 passningar, xT -0.19Tshimanga

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceExeter CityBarnet
    Points37
    xPoints4.75.3
    xG per match1.61.7
    xGA per match1.60.98
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.280.46
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.230.29
    Playing styleExeter CityBarnet
    Build-up efficiency0.310.35
    Field tilt0.340.7
    xT per match0.851
    xTA per match0.990.71
    Won balls, offensive half3240
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.310.5
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.250.52
    Entries into the box per match1016
    Entries into the box against1411
    Pass completion %0.630.58
    Pass completion % under pressure0.620.58
    Passes per match220217
    Passes against per match406190
    Switches of play per match13.713.2
    Long balls per match3525
    Set piecesExeter CityBarnet
    xG from free kicks0.110.05
    Corners per match5.88.6
    Corners against per match4.85.3
    xG per corner0.030
    xGA per corner against0.050.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.470.42
    First touch, defensive corners %0.360.44
    OtherExeter CityBarnet
    Throw-in control0.670.7
    The goalkeepersJack Thomas Bycroft (Exeter City)Matthew Aidan Cox (Barnet)
    Saves114
    Save %79%50%
    xG prevented59%30%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Exeter City vs Barnet according to our model?

    The model gives Barnet a 54% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Exeter City 23%, draw 23%, Barnet 54%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.