01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Chesterfield to win60%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
EFL League TwoSMH Group Stadium, Chesterfield16°18 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Chesterfield's possession-heavy game faces off against Gillingham's counter-attacking strategy in a League Two clash that's more intriguing than the odds suggest. With Chesterfield claiming 60% probability for a win, they look poised to dominate the match through ball control and patient buildup. The expected goals (xG) tilt in their favor too, standing at 1.74 against Gillingham’s 0.79, hinting at the hosts’ ability to create more meaningful chances.
Despite being slight underdogs in the head-to-head record since 2023, having only won one of their last four encounters and losing twice, Chesterfield's recent form and statistics suggest they hold a tangible edge. The small sample size of four matches shouldn’t overshadow the current data. Chesterfield edges ahead in both points (3 vs. 2) and expected points (4.4 vs. 3.7), reinforcing their status as favorites.
The model’s second most likely scoreline prediction, 2-0 (12%), complements Chesterfield's defensive resilience, evidenced by an expected goals against (xGA) of just 1.2 per match compared to Gillingham’s 1.4. While the likelihood of over 2.5 goals sits at a moderate 46%, the game is expected to remain relatively low-scoring, aligning with a 1-0 or 2-0 result. Both teams to score is at 45%, underscoring the probability of the visitors’ attack struggling to break through the home defense.
From a betting perspective, there's noteworthy value in backing Gillingham at 6.3 odds with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, given the model's 17% probability for a Gillingham win. This 7% edge is a sharp angle for those willing to back an upset, even if the hosts seem primed for victory.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Chesterfield | X | 2 · Gillingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.55 | 3.60 | EV+ 7% 6.30 |
| Betsson | 1.55 | 3.60 | EV+ 7% 6.30 |
| Nordicbet | 1.55 | 3.60 | EV+ 7% 6.30 |
| Pinnacle | 1.59 | 3.95 | 5.77 |
Odds updated 1 Sept, 10:31
1.50 → 1.59
4.06 → 3.95
6.18 → 5.77
1.93 → 2.01
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 01/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Chesterfield | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 2 |
| xPoints | 4.4 | 3.7 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 0.94 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.57 | 0.04 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| Playing style | Chesterfield | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.61 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 0.69 | 0.82 |
| xTA per match | 0.74 | 0.68 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 32 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.35 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.62 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.57 |
| Passes per match | 402 | 219 |
| Passes against per match | 288 | 290 |
| Switches of play per match | 46.6 | 15.2 |
| Long balls per match | 50 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Chesterfield | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.14 |
| Corners per match | 2 | 4 |
| Corners against per match | 2.3 | 7.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.06 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.25 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.71 | 0.61 |
| Other | Chesterfield | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.66 |
| The goalkeepers | Ryan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield) | Omar Jerome Beckles (Gillingham) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 3 |
| Save % | 79% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 86% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Chesterfield a 60% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Chesterfield 60%, draw 23%, Gillingham 17%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.