EFL League TwoSMH Group Stadium, Chesterfield16°18 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    ChesterfieldChesterfieldPossession control
    11
    GillinghamGillinghamCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Chesterfield (60%)Best value by the model: 2 · Gillingham @ 6.30 (+7 %)

    ChesterfieldGillingham · EFL League Two

    1 · Chesterfield 60%X 23%17% Gillingham · 2

    Analysis: ChesterfieldGillingham

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Chesterfield's possession-heavy game faces off against Gillingham's counter-attacking strategy in a League Two clash that's more intriguing than the odds suggest. With Chesterfield claiming 60% probability for a win, they look poised to dominate the match through ball control and patient buildup. The expected goals (xG) tilt in their favor too, standing at 1.74 against Gillingham’s 0.79, hinting at the hosts’ ability to create more meaningful chances.

    Despite being slight underdogs in the head-to-head record since 2023, having only won one of their last four encounters and losing twice, Chesterfield's recent form and statistics suggest they hold a tangible edge. The small sample size of four matches shouldn’t overshadow the current data. Chesterfield edges ahead in both points (3 vs. 2) and expected points (4.4 vs. 3.7), reinforcing their status as favorites.

    The model’s second most likely scoreline prediction, 2-0 (12%), complements Chesterfield's defensive resilience, evidenced by an expected goals against (xGA) of just 1.2 per match compared to Gillingham’s 1.4. While the likelihood of over 2.5 goals sits at a moderate 46%, the game is expected to remain relatively low-scoring, aligning with a 1-0 or 2-0 result. Both teams to score is at 45%, underscoring the probability of the visitors’ attack struggling to break through the home defense.

    From a betting perspective, there's noteworthy value in backing Gillingham at 6.3 odds with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, given the model's 17% probability for a Gillingham win. This 7% edge is a sharp angle for those willing to back an upset, even if the hosts seem primed for victory.

    ChesterfieldChesterfield
    Form LDLWL
    League ranking xG #6xGA #9xT #17xP/match #11Points #16
    Key players
    • Lee BonisFxG 0.73 · xT -0.13
    • Liam MandevilleCMxG 0.37 · xT -0.03
    • Lewis GordonLBxG 0.03 · xT 0.02
    GillinghamGillingham
    Form LWLDD
    League ranking xG #19xGA #13xT #14xP/match #14Points #21
    Key players
    • Ronan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman HaleFxG 0.24 · xT -0.04
    • James Robert BrophyFxG 0.05 · xT 0.08
    • William Neil GoodwinFxG 0.37 · xT 0.00
    Final score
    11
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Chesterfield 60% · Draw 23% · Gillingham 17%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - ChesterfieldBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 5,86fair 7,64-23 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - GillinghamBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 26,87fair 36,08-26 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: ChesterfieldGillingham

    Predicted score matrix

    Gillingham
    Chesterfield
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.3%
    0–16.0%
    0–22.5%
    0–30.7%
    0–4+0.2%
    1
    1–013.5%
    1–111.3%
    1–24.3%
    1–31.1%
    1–4+0.3%
    2
    2–012.0%
    2–19.5%
    2–23.8%
    2–31.0%
    2–4+0.2%
    3
    3–07.0%
    3–15.5%
    3–22.2%
    3–30.6%
    3–4+0.1%
    4+
    4+–04.5%
    4+–13.6%
    4+–21.4%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-014%
    2. 2.2-012%
    3. 3.1-111%
    4. 4.2-110%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,740,79
    Both teams to score
    45%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,554%
    @1.83
    Over 2,546%
    @2.01

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Chesterfield to win60%
    • Under 3.5 goals75%

    Combined probability

    42%

    Fair odds

    2.38

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Chesterfield to win60%
    • Under 2.5 goals54%
    • Dilan Kumar Markanday to score27%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score45%
    • Over 2.5 goals46%
    • Dilan Kumar Markanday to score27%
    • Armani George Little to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Gillingham17% probability@6.30BetsafeEV+7%reference odds
    • 2 · Gillingham17% probability@6.30BetssonEV+7%reference odds
    • 2 · Gillingham17% probability@6.30NordicbetEV+7%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · ChesterfieldX2 · Gillingham
    Betsafe1.553.60
    EV+ 7%
    6.30
    Betsson1.553.60
    EV+ 7%
    6.30
    Nordicbet1.553.60
    EV+ 7%
    6.30
    Pinnacle1.593.955.77

    Odds updated 1 Sept, 10:31

    Odds movement

    1+6 %
    63 %58 %

    1.501.59

    X-3 %
    26 %21 %

    4.063.95

    2-7 %
    18 %13 %

    6.185.77

    Over 2,5+4 %
    51 %46 %

    1.932.01

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 01/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Chesterfield 1Draw 1Gillingham 2
    Goals: 36 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Chesterfield
    Gillingham
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Chesterfield (23)
    Gillingham (14)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Chesterfield
    Jack Benjamin Simpson: 200 passningar, xT 0.37SimpsonKyle Mcfadzean: 174 passningar, xT 0.29McfadzeanLewis Gordon: 155 passningar, xT 0.03GordonRemeao Andrew Hutton: 137 passningar, xT 0.77HuttonGeorge McEachran: 119 passningar, xT 0.11McEachranRyan Stirk: 116 passningar, xT 0.04StirkRyan Thomas William Boot: 88 passningar, xT 0.12BootLiam Mandeville: 66 passningar, xT -0.05MandevilleDilan Markanday: 56 passningar, xT 0.15MarkandayJoshua Abdulai Koroma: 41 passningar, xT 0.36KoromaAbdulmalik Timmy Owolabi-Belewu: 20 passningar, xT 0.04Owolabi-Belewu
    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 103 passningar, xT 0.11BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 82 passningar, xT 0.18BrophyLogan Dobbs: 80 passningar, xT 0.14DobbsAndy Smith: 64 passningar, xT 0.09SmithNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 54 passningar, xT 1.16FreemanRobbie Mckenzie: 40 passningar, xT -0.03MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 38 passningar, xT -0.12HaleAshley Maynard-Brewer: 32 passningar, xT 0.12Maynard-BrewerZane Albarus: 26 passningar, xT 0.05AlbarusOliver Lennon George Wright: 21 passningar, xT 0.08WrightKadeem Raymond Mathurin-Harris: 20 passningar, xT 0.12Mathurin-Harris
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Chesterfield
    Jack Benjamin Simpson: 200 passningar, xT 0.37SimpsonKyle Mcfadzean: 174 passningar, xT 0.29McfadzeanLewis Gordon: 155 passningar, xT 0.03GordonRemeao Andrew Hutton: 137 passningar, xT 0.77HuttonGeorge McEachran: 119 passningar, xT 0.11McEachranRyan Stirk: 116 passningar, xT 0.04StirkRyan Thomas William Boot: 88 passningar, xT 0.12BootLiam Mandeville: 66 passningar, xT -0.05MandevilleDilan Markanday: 56 passningar, xT 0.15MarkandayJoshua Abdulai Koroma: 41 passningar, xT 0.36KoromaAbdulmalik Timmy Owolabi-Belewu: 20 passningar, xT 0.04Owolabi-Belewu
    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 103 passningar, xT 0.11BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 82 passningar, xT 0.18BrophyLogan Dobbs: 80 passningar, xT 0.14DobbsAndy Smith: 64 passningar, xT 0.09SmithNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 54 passningar, xT 1.16FreemanRobbie Mckenzie: 40 passningar, xT -0.03MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 38 passningar, xT -0.12HaleAshley Maynard-Brewer: 32 passningar, xT 0.12Maynard-BrewerZane Albarus: 26 passningar, xT 0.05AlbarusOliver Lennon George Wright: 21 passningar, xT 0.08WrightKadeem Raymond Mathurin-Harris: 20 passningar, xT 0.12Mathurin-Harris

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceChesterfieldGillingham
    Points32
    xPoints4.43.7
    xG per match1.60.94
    xGA per match1.21.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.570.04
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.270.22
    Playing styleChesterfieldGillingham
    Build-up efficiency0.320.33
    Field tilt0.610.41
    xT per match0.690.82
    xTA per match0.740.68
    Won balls, offensive half2732
    Pressing intensity0.210.23
    Pressing efficiency0.350.32
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.350.33
    Entries into the box per match1211
    Entries into the box against914
    Pass completion %0.750.62
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.57
    Passes per match402219
    Passes against per match288290
    Switches of play per match46.615.2
    Long balls per match5029
    Set piecesChesterfieldGillingham
    xG from free kicks0.010.14
    Corners per match24
    Corners against per match2.37.6
    xG per corner0.060
    xGA per corner against0.010.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330.25
    First touch, defensive corners %0.710.61
    OtherChesterfieldGillingham
    Throw-in control0.760.66
    The goalkeepersRyan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield)Omar Jerome Beckles (Gillingham)
    Saves113
    Save %79%100%
    xG prevented86%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Chesterfield vs Gillingham according to our model?

    The model gives Chesterfield a 60% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Chesterfield 60%, draw 23%, Gillingham 17%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.