EFL League TwoSpotland, Rochdale15°19 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    RochdaleRochdalePossession control
    30
    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury TownCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Rochdale (43%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 1.91 (+11 %)

    RochdaleShrewsbury Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Rochdale 43%X 29%28% Shrewsbury Town · 2

    Analysis: RochdaleShrewsbury Town

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Rochdale's current form is a worrying trend. They have slumped to three consecutive defeats, which hardly instills confidence for their clash against Shrewsbury Town. Despite the home advantage and a possession-based style, they’ve struggled to convert that into tangible results, reflected in their low xG of 0.71 per match. On the other hand, the visitors may only have 3 points from their matches so far, but their higher xG and more solid defense suggest they’re a tougher nut to crack.

    The game projects to be a tight affair, with the model slightly favoring Rochdale. The expected goals lineup suggests a close contest: Rochdale at 1.33 and Shrewsbury at 1.02. This hints at potential frustration for Shrewsbury Town, who will likely rely on their counter-attacking strength and ability to deliver crosses. The most probable scorelines highlight low-scoring outcomes, with 1-1 leading the pack at a 13% likelihood, followed by 1-0 and 0-0.

    Defensively, Rochdale is leaking goals at an xGA of 1.6, which may offer Shrewsbury opportunities to exploit their counter-attacking strategy. However, with only a 42% chance of the match going over 2.5 goals, it’s clear neither team is expected to run riot. The betting market seems to overlook the possibility of a goalless draw, providing an intriguing angle.

    For those seeking value, the under 0.5 goals option is a bold punt. At odds of 12.0 available with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the model sees a 10% chance of this happening, presenting an 18% edge. Given the conservative scoring forecasts, it’s a daring play in a match that might just fizzle rather than sizzle.

    RochdaleRochdale
    Form LLL
    League ranking xG #23xGA #18xT #18xP/match #23Points #24
    Key players
    • Daniel Thomas MossRWxG 0.33 · xT 0.29
    • Ethan Reid Ebanks-LandellCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.06
    • Ryan Henry EastCMxG 0.07 · xT 0.17
    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury Town
    Form DLLLW
    League ranking xG #10xGA #11xT #6xP/match #12Points #18
    Key players
    • Tom SangRWxG 0.00 · xT 0.29
    • Luca Anthony HooleCBxG 0.06 · xT 0.10
    • Kevin BerkoeLWBxG 0.04 · xT 0.16
    Final score
    30
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Rochdale 43% · Draw 29% · Shrewsbury Town 28%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - RochdaleBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 7,73fair 11,56-33 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - ShrewsburyBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 10,87fair 19,32-44 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: RochdaleShrewsbury Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Shrewsbury Town
    Rochdale
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.9%
    0–19.3%
    0–25.0%
    0–31.7%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–012.3%
    1–113.3%
    1–26.6%
    1–32.3%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–08.4%
    2–18.6%
    2–24.4%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–03.7%
    3–13.8%
    3–22.0%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.7%
    4+–11.7%
    4+–20.9%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.0-010%
    4. 4.0-19%
    5. 5.2-19%
    Expected goals
    1,331,02
    Both teams to score
    48%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,558%
    @1.91EV+6%
    Over 2,542%
    @1.93

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Rochdale or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 3.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    56%

    Fair odds

    1.78

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Rochdale or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 2.5 goals58%
    • Dajaune Anthony Brown to score22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score48%
    • Over 2.5 goals42%
    • Dajaune Anthony Brown to score22%
    • Luca Anthony Hoole to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.558% probability@1.91PinnacleEV+11%reference odds
    • Under 2.558% probability@1.82BetsafeEV+6%reference odds
    • Under 2.558% probability@1.82BetssonEV+6%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · RochdaleX2 · Shrewsbury Town
    Betsafe2.223.303.05
    Betsson2.223.303.05
    Nordicbet2.223.303.05
    Pinnacle2.23
    EV+ 4%
    3.60
    3.11

    Odds updated 1 Sept, 11:35

    Odds movement

    1+10 %
    47 %42 %

    2.032.23

    X-3 %
    28 %23 %

    3.713.60

    2-5 %
    32 %27 %

    3.293.11

    Over 2,5+2 %
    52 %47 %

    1.881.93

    Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 01/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Rochdale have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Rochdale
    Shrewsbury Town
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Rochdale (16)
    Shrewsbury Town (25)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Rochdale
    Ethan Reid Ebanks-Landell: 169 passningar, xT 0.15Ebanks-LandellSam Sherring: 165 passningar, xT 0.31SherringKaiden Carlton Anthony Wilson: 113 passningar, xT 0.15WilsonNils Ramming: 100 passningar, xT 0.13RammingRyan Henry East: 77 passningar, xT 0.4EastHarvey James Gilmour: 66 passningar, xT 0.06GilmourOlutobi Adebayo-Rowling: 61 passningar, xT -0.03Adebayo-RowlingDaniel Thomas Moss: 58 passningar, xT 0.52MossEdward Albert Francis: 56 passningar, xT 0.08FrancisBabajide Ezekiel Adeeko: 53 passningar, xT 0.01AdeekoDajaune Anthony Brown: 31 passningar, xT -0.09Brown
    Shrewsbury Town
    Tom Sang: 78 passningar, xT 0.84SangKevin Berkoe: 69 passningar, xT 0.42BerkoeJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 69 passningar, xT 0.08RuffelsLuca Anthony Hoole: 66 passningar, xT 0.26HooleWill Gary: 51 passningar, xT -0.07GaryWilliam Michael Brook: 49 passningar, xT 0.11BrookArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 48 passningar, xT 0.74Jude-BoydIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 47 passningar, xT 0.39FletcherWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 45 passningar, xT 0.21BoyleJay Turner-Cooke: 24 passningar, xT 0.08Turner-CookeTom Anderson: 23 passningar, xT 0.18Anderson
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Rochdale
    Ethan Reid Ebanks-Landell: 169 passningar, xT 0.15Ebanks-LandellSam Sherring: 165 passningar, xT 0.31SherringKaiden Carlton Anthony Wilson: 113 passningar, xT 0.15WilsonNils Ramming: 100 passningar, xT 0.13RammingRyan Henry East: 77 passningar, xT 0.4EastHarvey James Gilmour: 66 passningar, xT 0.06GilmourOlutobi Adebayo-Rowling: 61 passningar, xT -0.03Adebayo-RowlingDaniel Thomas Moss: 58 passningar, xT 0.52MossEdward Albert Francis: 56 passningar, xT 0.08FrancisBabajide Ezekiel Adeeko: 53 passningar, xT 0.01AdeekoDajaune Anthony Brown: 31 passningar, xT -0.09Brown
    Shrewsbury Town
    Tom Sang: 78 passningar, xT 0.84SangKevin Berkoe: 69 passningar, xT 0.42BerkoeJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 69 passningar, xT 0.08RuffelsLuca Anthony Hoole: 66 passningar, xT 0.26HooleWill Gary: 51 passningar, xT -0.07GaryWilliam Michael Brook: 49 passningar, xT 0.11BrookArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 48 passningar, xT 0.74Jude-BoydIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 47 passningar, xT 0.39FletcherWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 45 passningar, xT 0.21BoyleJay Turner-Cooke: 24 passningar, xT 0.08Turner-CookeTom Anderson: 23 passningar, xT 0.18Anderson

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceRochdaleShrewsbury Town
    Points03
    xPoints2.24.2
    xG per match0.711.4
    xGA per match1.61.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.020.07
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.110.28
    Playing styleRochdaleShrewsbury Town
    Build-up efficiency0.320.33
    Field tilt0.430.43
    xT per match0.681.2
    xTA per match0.920.78
    Won balls, offensive half1734
    Pressing intensity0.220.24
    Pressing efficiency0.340.36
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.36
    Entries into the box per match713
    Entries into the box against1412
    Pass completion %0.770.58
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.52
    Passes per match357207
    Passes against per match247277
    Switches of play per match23.915.4
    Long balls per match3429
    Set piecesRochdaleShrewsbury Town
    xG from free kicks0.010.23
    Corners per match4.75.7
    Corners against per match5.75
    xG per corner0.030.02
    xGA per corner against0.060.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.210.41
    First touch, defensive corners %0.710.67
    OtherRochdaleShrewsbury Town
    Throw-in control0.790.76
    The goalkeepersNils Ramming (Rochdale)William Sam Douglas Harry Boyle (Shrewsbury Town)
    Saves75
    Save %54%100%
    xG prevented29%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Rochdale vs Shrewsbury Town according to our model?

    The model gives Rochdale a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Rochdale 43%, draw 29%, Shrewsbury Town 28%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 42% and under at 58%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.