EFL League TwoSt James Park, Exeter12°12,7 mm32 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Exeter CityExeter CityPossession control
    2–1
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood TownPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Exeter City (37%)Best value by the model: Under 1,5 @ 3.15 (+11 %)

    Exeter City vs Fleetwood Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Exeter City 37%X 33%30% Fleetwood Town · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 2–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Exeter City vs Fleetwood Town (EFL League Two, Saturday, 24 October 2026): Exeter City win 37%, draw 33%, Fleetwood Town win 30%. Expected goals (xG): Exeter City 1.13, Fleetwood Town 1.06. Most likely score: 1-1 (14%). Over 2.5 goals 37%, both teams to score 45%. Double chance: Exeter City or draw 70%, Fleetwood Town or draw 63%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Exeter City – Fleetwood Town

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Exeter City and Fleetwood Town are facing off, and while Exeter has a slight edge in the model probabilities, the recent head-to-head encounters are too few to lean on heavily. This is a fresh matchup for these squads in the current season landscape. Both teams share similar playing styles, aiming to control possession, which could lead to a tactical battle rather than a shootout, especially given the weather's dampening effect on attacking play.

    Exeter has shown a stronger defensive setup with an xGA of 1.1 compared to Fleetwood's more porous 1.5. However, Fleetwood edges slightly ahead in expected goals per match with 1.2 against Exeter's 1.1, indicating they possess a bit more attacking firepower. Yet, with Exeter's superior xPoints (17.6 vs. 13.8) and actual points (16 vs. 14), they appear to have the upper hand, even if the margin is narrow. The model's most likely outcomes suggest a tight contest: 1-1 or perhaps a 1-0, with both teams struggling to find the back of the net consistently.

    The forecast of 12.7 mm of rain could further stifle goal-scoring opportunities, already predicted to be low. An over 2.5 goals probability sitting at just 37% aligns with a cautious approach to this game, where defenses might hold the upper hand. Both teams to score also remains below the halfway mark at 45%, reinforcing the potential for a low-scoring struggle.

    For those eyeing a betting angle, the real value lies in the under markets. Betsafe and Nordicbet both offer under 1.5 goals at odds of 3.2, with a model-rated probability of 35%, providing a substantial 13% edge. For the more daring, Betsafe's under 0.5 goals at 9.7 also carries the same edge. Given the expected tactical battle and wet conditions, these options offer a sharp punt for those willing to bet against a flurry of goals.

    Exeter CityExeter City
    Form LWWDW
    League ranking xG #22xGA #5xT #19xP/match #8Points #10
    Key players
    • Jake Billy Doyle-HayesCMxG 0.01 · xT 0.12
    • Jack Paul TaylorCBxG 0.00 · xT 0.02
    • Edward George Martin JamesCBxG 0.18 · xT 0.04
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood Town
    Form LLDWL
    League ranking xG #14xGA #18xT #7xP/match #21Points #18
    Key players
    • Harrison NealCDMxG 0.06 · xT 0.08
    • Mark HelmCAMxG 0.13 · xT 0.14
    • Jake Thomas BattyCAMxG 0.02 · xT 0.09
    Final score
    2 – 1
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Exeter City 37% · Draw 33% · Fleetwood Town 30%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - FleetwoodBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 11,27fair 18,42-39 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - ExeterBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 8,92fair 16,45-46 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Exeter City – Fleetwood Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Fleetwood Town →
    Exeter City →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–011.6%
    0–111.5%
    0–26.3%
    0–32.2%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–012.2%
    1–113.8%
    1–27.1%
    1–32.5%
    1–4+0.8%
    2
    2–07.1%
    2–17.5%
    2–24.0%
    2–31.4%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–02.7%
    3–12.8%
    3–21.5%
    3–30.5%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.0%
    4+–11.0%
    4+–20.5%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-114%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.0-012%
    4. 4.0-112%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,13–1,06
    Both teams to score
    45%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,2
    Under 2,563%
    @1.72EV+8%
    Over 2,537%
    @2.14

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Exeter City or draw (1X)67%
    • Under 3.5 goals82%

    Combined probability

    55%

    Fair odds

    1.82

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Exeter City or draw (1X)67%
    • Under 2.5 goals63%
    • Joshua Luke Gordon to score20%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score45%
    • Over 2.5 goals37%
    • Joshua Luke Gordon to score20%
    • Harrison Neal to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 1.535% probability@3.15BetsafeEV+11%reference odds
    • Under 1.535% probability@3.15NordicbetEV+11%reference odds
    • Under 2.563% probability@1.72PinnacleEV+8%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Exeter CityX2 · Fleetwood Town
    Betsafe2.32
    EV+ 5%
    3.20
    2.95
    LeoVegas2.35
    EV+ 3%
    3.15
    3.00
    Nordicbet2.32
    EV+ 5%
    3.20
    2.95
    Pinnacle2.40
    EV+ 6%
    3.24
    3.09

    Odds updated 24 Oct, 13:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards a Exeter City win since 22 October — the odds have shortened from 2.58 to 2.40 (−7%).

    1-7 %
    41 %36 %

    2.58 → 2.40

    X-1 %
    32 %27 %

    3.26 → 3.24

    2+14 %
    35 %30 %

    2.70 → 3.09

    Over 2,5+6 %
    48 %43 %

    2.01 → 2.14

    Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 22/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Exeter City
    Fleetwood Town
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Exeter City (8–6)
    Fleetwood Town (14–15)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Exeter City
    Jake Billy Doyle-Hayes: 191 passningar, xT 0.6Doyle-HayesLuca Woodhouse: 185 passningar, xT 0.28WoodhouseLakyle Samuel: 164 passningar, xT 0.5SamuelJack Joseph Fitzwater: 163 passningar, xT 0.13FitzwaterJack Paul Taylor: 129 passningar, xT 0.13TaylorCharlie James Cummins: 122 passningar, xT -0.08CumminsJack Thomas Bycroft: 86 passningar, xT 0.19BycroftTaylor Perry: 67 passningar, xT 0.28PerryAnthony Scully: 48 passningar, xT 0.04ScullyEthan Sutherland: 43 passningar, xT 0.43SutherlandGeorge Edward Birch: 40 passningar, xT 0.48Birch
    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 211 passningar, xT 0.67NealFinley Potter: 199 passningar, xT 0.49PotterShaun Rooney: 178 passningar, xT 0.42RooneyMark Helm: 119 passningar, xT 0.53HelmJake Thomas Batty: 115 passningar, xT 0.38BattyRhys Bennett: 115 passningar, xT 0.09BennettLewis McCann: 91 passningar, xT 0.46McCannJay Lynch: 90 passningar, xT 0.28LynchAdam Murphy: 58 passningar, xT 0.15MurphyChedwyn Michael Evans: 43 passningar, xT 0.05EvansRaffaele Cirino: 43 passningar, xT 0.21Cirino
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Exeter City
    Jake Billy Doyle-Hayes: 191 passningar, xT 0.6Doyle-HayesLuca Woodhouse: 185 passningar, xT 0.28WoodhouseLakyle Samuel: 164 passningar, xT 0.5SamuelJack Joseph Fitzwater: 163 passningar, xT 0.13FitzwaterJack Paul Taylor: 129 passningar, xT 0.13TaylorCharlie James Cummins: 122 passningar, xT -0.08CumminsJack Thomas Bycroft: 86 passningar, xT 0.19BycroftTaylor Perry: 67 passningar, xT 0.28PerryAnthony Scully: 48 passningar, xT 0.04ScullyEthan Sutherland: 43 passningar, xT 0.43SutherlandGeorge Edward Birch: 40 passningar, xT 0.48Birch
    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 211 passningar, xT 0.67NealFinley Potter: 199 passningar, xT 0.49PotterShaun Rooney: 178 passningar, xT 0.42RooneyMark Helm: 119 passningar, xT 0.53HelmJake Thomas Batty: 115 passningar, xT 0.38BattyRhys Bennett: 115 passningar, xT 0.09BennettLewis McCann: 91 passningar, xT 0.46McCannJay Lynch: 90 passningar, xT 0.28LynchAdam Murphy: 58 passningar, xT 0.15MurphyChedwyn Michael Evans: 43 passningar, xT 0.05EvansRaffaele Cirino: 43 passningar, xT 0.21Cirino

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceExeter CityFleetwood Town
    Points1614
    xPoints17.613.8
    xG per match1.11.2
    xGA per match1.11.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.230.12
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.160.14
    Playing styleExeter CityFleetwood Town
    Build-up efficiency0.310.34
    Field tilt0.430.52
    xT per match0.671.1
    xTA per match0.840.87
    Won balls, offensive half3029
    Pressing intensity0.230.22
    Pressing efficiency0.370.38
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.320.4
    Entries into the box per match1013
    Entries into the box against1310
    Pass completion %0.640.64
    Pass completion % under pressure0.620.62
    Passes per match238278
    Passes against per match293262
    Switches of play per match16.817.2
    Long balls per match3129
    Set piecesExeter CityFleetwood Town
    xG from free kicks0.060.07
    Corners per match4.35.4
    Corners against per match4.85.4
    xG per corner0.020.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.490.34
    First touch, defensive corners %0.530.63
    OtherExeter CityFleetwood Town
    Throw-in control0.690.7
    The goalkeepersJack Thomas Bycroft (Exeter City)Jay Lynch (Fleetwood Town)
    Saves3325
    Save %85%64%
    xG prevented62%33%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Exeter City vs Fleetwood Town according to our model?

    The model gives Exeter City a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Exeter City 37%, draw 33%, Fleetwood Town 30%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 37% and under at 63%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Exeter City vs Fleetwood Town?

    The model expects 1.13 goals (xG) for Exeter City and 1.06 for Fleetwood Town, 2.19 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Exeter City or draw (1X) 70%, Fleetwood Town or draw (X2) 63% and no draw (12) 67%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.