EFL League TwoPriestfield Stadium, Gillingham11°15,8 mm38 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    GillinghamGillinghamLow block & direct
    1–4
    Grimsby TownGrimsby TownPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Grimsby Town (41%)Best value by the model: Under 0,5 @ 12.00 (+30 %)

    Gillingham vs Grimsby Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Gillingham 29%X 31%41% Grimsby Town · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 1–4. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Gillingham vs Grimsby Town (EFL League Two, Saturday, 24 October 2026): Gillingham win 29%, draw 31%, Grimsby Town win 41%. Expected goals (xG): Gillingham 1.07, Grimsby Town 1.19. Most likely score: 1-1 (14%). Over 2.5 goals 39%, both teams to score 46%. Double chance: Gillingham or draw 59%, Grimsby Town or draw 71%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Gillingham – Grimsby Town

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    Grimsby Town's possession-based approach has so far proven effective against Gillingham, having won three of their past four encounters since 2023. Though the sample size is limited, this pattern hints at an edge for the visitors. The model leans towards Grimsby Town, giving them a 41% chance of victory, suggesting their style might once again trouble the hosts who favour a more direct approach.

    Gillingham holds a slight edge in both traditional and expected points over Grimsby Town—17 to 14 and 17.1 to 15.5 respectively. However, the expected goals per match tell a different story, with Grimsby Town leading 1.7 to 1.1. This indicates that while Gillingham may appear efficient in terms of points, Grimsby is generating higher quality opportunities in attack. Defensively, both teams are closely matched, with Gillingham marginally ahead on xGA at 1.3 compared to Grimsby’s 1.4.

    Weather conditions forecasted to include significant rainfall could lead to a tighter affair, suppressing goal-scoring chances. This aligns with the expected goals data, which also suggests a low-scoring game: Gillingham 1.07, Grimsby Town 1.19. The probability for over 2.5 goals sits at just 39%. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 and 0-0, further support a cautious outlook.

    Given the model's probabilities and the style of play, a 1-1 draw seems the most plausible result, with a slight lean towards Grimsby Town edging it 0-1. But for those who prefer a calculated risk, there's value in the under 0.5 market, with Betsafe and Nordicbet offering odds of 13.0, representing a 40% edge according to the model. Furthermore, the under 1.5 goals option at odds of 3.7 with Betsafe provides a 24% edge, appealing to bettors who lean towards a conservative, defensively oriented outcome.

    GillinghamGillingham
    Form LDWLD
    League ranking xG #19xGA #15xT #20xP/match #10Points #7
    Key players
    • Omar Jerome BecklesCBxG 0.09 · xT 0.03
    • James Robert BrophyLWxG 0.09 · xT 0.08
    • Ronan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman HaleLWxG 0.31 · xT 0.00
    Grimsby TownGrimsby Town
    Form LLLLD
    League ranking xG #4xGA #16xT #1xP/match #19Points #17
    Key players
    • Jamie WalkerCDMxG 0.11 · xT 0.17
    • Cameron McjannettCBxG 0.06 · xT 0.09
    • Charles VernamLWxG 0.27 · xT 0.22
    Final score
    1 – 4
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Gillingham 29% · Draw 31% · Grimsby Town 41%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - GillinghamBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 9,95fair 17,73-44 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - GrimsbyBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 6,94fair 14,51-52 %
    Hit

    Match prediction: Gillingham – Grimsby Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Grimsby Town →
    Gillingham →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–010.8%
    0–112.0%
    0–27.4%
    0–32.9%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–010.8%
    1–113.7%
    1–27.9%
    1–33.1%
    1–4+1.2%
    2
    2–06.0%
    2–17.1%
    2–24.2%
    2–31.7%
    2–4+0.6%
    3
    3–02.1%
    3–12.5%
    3–21.5%
    3–30.6%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–00.7%
    4+–10.9%
    4+–20.5%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-114%
    2. 2.0-112%
    3. 3.0-011%
    4. 4.1-011%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,07–1,19
    Both teams to score
    46%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,3
    Under 2,561%
    @2.04EV+20%
    Over 2,539%
    @1.80

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Grimsby Town or draw (X2)68%
    • Under 3.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    55%

    Fair odds

    1.83

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Grimsby Town or draw (X2)68%
    • Under 2.5 goals61%
    • Andrew Ellis Cook to score20%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score46%
    • Over 2.5 goals39%
    • Andrew Ellis Cook to score20%
    • Jamie Allan Walker to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 0.511% probability@12.00BetsafeEV+30%reference odds
    • Under 0.511% probability@12.00NordicbetEV+30%reference odds
    • Under 1.534% probability@3.75LeoVegasEV+26%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · GillinghamX2 · Grimsby Town
    Betsafe3.05
    EV+ 5%
    3.40
    2.15
    LeoVegas3.20
    EV+ 3%
    3.35
    2.12
    Nordicbet3.05
    EV+ 5%
    3.40
    2.15
    Pinnacle3.43
    EV+ 7%
    3.46
    2.14

    Odds updated 24 Oct, 13:36

    Odds movement

    1+6 %
    31 %26 %

    3.24 → 3.43

    X+1 %
    30 %25 %

    3.41 → 3.46

    2-1 %
    47 %42 %

    2.16 → 2.14

    Over 2,5+1 %
    56 %51 %

    1.77 → 1.80

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 21/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Gillingham 0Draw 1Grimsby Town 3
    Goals: 2–7 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Gillingham
    Grimsby Town
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Gillingham (17–14)
    Grimsby Town (15–15)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 205 passningar, xT 0.24BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 148 passningar, xT 0.31BrophyOliver Lennon George Wright: 143 passningar, xT 0.18WrightNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 119 passningar, xT 0.57FreemanLogan Dobbs: 113 passningar, xT 0.11DobbsAndy Smith: 108 passningar, xT 0.17SmithRobbie Mckenzie: 77 passningar, xT 0.02MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 61 passningar, xT -0.09HaleJack Daley: 54 passningar, xT 0.19DaleyArmani Little: 54 passningar, xT 0.14LittleGarath James McCleary: 44 passningar, xT -0.05McCleary
    Grimsby Town
    Maldini Kacurri: 154 passningar, xT 0.33KacurriHarvey Rodgers: 151 passningar, xT 1.28RodgersCameron Mcjannett: 145 passningar, xT 0.18McjannettChristy James Pym: 141 passningar, xT 0.45PymGeza David Turi: 126 passningar, xT 0.34TuriJayden Deslandes Sweeney: 125 passningar, xT 0.64SweeneyJamie Walker: 93 passningar, xT 0.63WalkerCharles Vernam: 84 passningar, xT 0.85VernamKieran Green: 72 passningar, xT 0.86GreenEdon Pruti: 72 passningar, xT 0.08PrutiJoseph James Foulkes: 55 passningar, xT 0.06Foulkes
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 205 passningar, xT 0.24BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 148 passningar, xT 0.31BrophyOliver Lennon George Wright: 143 passningar, xT 0.18WrightNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 119 passningar, xT 0.57FreemanLogan Dobbs: 113 passningar, xT 0.11DobbsAndy Smith: 108 passningar, xT 0.17SmithRobbie Mckenzie: 77 passningar, xT 0.02MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 61 passningar, xT -0.09HaleJack Daley: 54 passningar, xT 0.19DaleyArmani Little: 54 passningar, xT 0.14LittleGarath James McCleary: 44 passningar, xT -0.05McCleary
    Grimsby Town
    Maldini Kacurri: 154 passningar, xT 0.33KacurriHarvey Rodgers: 151 passningar, xT 1.28RodgersCameron Mcjannett: 145 passningar, xT 0.18McjannettChristy James Pym: 141 passningar, xT 0.45PymGeza David Turi: 126 passningar, xT 0.34TuriJayden Deslandes Sweeney: 125 passningar, xT 0.64SweeneyJamie Walker: 93 passningar, xT 0.63WalkerCharles Vernam: 84 passningar, xT 0.85VernamKieran Green: 72 passningar, xT 0.86GreenEdon Pruti: 72 passningar, xT 0.08PrutiJoseph James Foulkes: 55 passningar, xT 0.06Foulkes

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceGillinghamGrimsby Town
    Points1714
    xPoints17.115.5
    xG per match1.11.7
    xGA per match1.31.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.350.26
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.270.15
    Playing styleGillinghamGrimsby Town
    Build-up efficiency0.330.33
    Field tilt0.390.6
    xT per match0.671.4
    xTA per match0.960.78
    Won balls, offensive half2333
    Pressing intensity0.240.22
    Pressing efficiency0.340.43
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.330.41
    Entries into the box per match817
    Entries into the box against139
    Pass completion %0.630.67
    Pass completion % under pressure0.580.62
    Passes per match243282
    Passes against per match317216
    Switches of play per match18.424.2
    Long balls per match3137
    Set piecesGillinghamGrimsby Town
    xG from free kicks0.070.07
    Corners per match3.76.6
    Corners against per match5.55.8
    xG per corner0.010.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.390.38
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.59
    OtherGillinghamGrimsby Town
    Throw-in control0.750.7
    The goalkeepersOliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham)Christy James Pym (Grimsby Town)
    Saves3327
    Save %81%69%
    xG prevented66%54%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Gillingham vs Grimsby Town according to our model?

    The model gives Grimsby Town a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gillingham 29%, draw 31%, Grimsby Town 41%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 39% and under at 61%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 46% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Gillingham vs Grimsby Town?

    The model expects 1.07 goals (xG) for Gillingham and 1.19 for Grimsby Town, 2.26 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Gillingham or draw (1X) 59%, Grimsby Town or draw (X2) 71% and no draw (12) 69%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.