01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Grimsby Town or draw (X2)68%
- Under 3.5 goals81%
EFL League TwoPriestfield Stadium, Gillingham11°15,8 mm38 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–4. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Gillingham vs Grimsby Town (EFL League Two, Saturday, 24 October 2026): Gillingham win 29%, draw 31%, Grimsby Town win 41%. Expected goals (xG): Gillingham 1.07, Grimsby Town 1.19. Most likely score: 1-1 (14%). Over 2.5 goals 39%, both teams to score 46%. Double chance: Gillingham or draw 59%, Grimsby Town or draw 71%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Grimsby Town's possession-based approach has so far proven effective against Gillingham, having won three of their past four encounters since 2023. Though the sample size is limited, this pattern hints at an edge for the visitors. The model leans towards Grimsby Town, giving them a 41% chance of victory, suggesting their style might once again trouble the hosts who favour a more direct approach.
Gillingham holds a slight edge in both traditional and expected points over Grimsby Town—17 to 14 and 17.1 to 15.5 respectively. However, the expected goals per match tell a different story, with Grimsby Town leading 1.7 to 1.1. This indicates that while Gillingham may appear efficient in terms of points, Grimsby is generating higher quality opportunities in attack. Defensively, both teams are closely matched, with Gillingham marginally ahead on xGA at 1.3 compared to Grimsby’s 1.4.
Weather conditions forecasted to include significant rainfall could lead to a tighter affair, suppressing goal-scoring chances. This aligns with the expected goals data, which also suggests a low-scoring game: Gillingham 1.07, Grimsby Town 1.19. The probability for over 2.5 goals sits at just 39%. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 and 0-0, further support a cautious outlook.
Given the model's probabilities and the style of play, a 1-1 draw seems the most plausible result, with a slight lean towards Grimsby Town edging it 0-1. But for those who prefer a calculated risk, there's value in the under 0.5 market, with Betsafe and Nordicbet offering odds of 13.0, representing a 40% edge according to the model. Furthermore, the under 1.5 goals option at odds of 3.7 with Betsafe provides a 24% edge, appealing to bettors who lean towards a conservative, defensively oriented outcome.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Gillingham | X | 2 · Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.05 | EV+ 5% 3.40 | 2.15 |
| LeoVegas | 3.20 | EV+ 3% 3.35 | 2.12 |
| Nordicbet | 3.05 | EV+ 5% 3.40 | 2.15 |
| Pinnacle | 3.43 | EV+ 7% 3.46 | 2.14 |
Odds updated 24 Oct, 13:36
3.24 → 3.43
3.41 → 3.46
2.16 → 2.14
1.77 → 1.80
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 21/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Gillingham | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 17 | 14 |
| xPoints | 17.1 | 15.5 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.35 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.15 |
| Playing style | Gillingham | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.39 | 0.6 |
| xT per match | 0.67 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.34 | 0.43 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.33 | 0.41 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.58 | 0.62 |
| Passes per match | 243 | 282 |
| Passes against per match | 317 | 216 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.4 | 24.2 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 37 |
| Set pieces | Gillingham | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 3.7 | 6.6 |
| Corners against per match | 5.5 | 5.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.38 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.59 |
| Other | Gillingham | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Oliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham) | Christy James Pym (Grimsby Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 33 | 27 |
| Save % | 81% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 66% | 54% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Grimsby Town a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gillingham 29%, draw 31%, Grimsby Town 41%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 39% and under at 61%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 46% according to the model.
The model expects 1.07 goals (xG) for Gillingham and 1.19 for Grimsby Town, 2.26 in total.
Gillingham or draw (1X) 59%, Grimsby Town or draw (X2) 71% and no draw (12) 69%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.