01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Wehen Wiesbaden to win50%
- Over 1.5 goals86%
3. Liga9°4,0 mm17 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 7–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Wehen Wiesbaden vs Sonnenhof Grossaspach (3. Liga, Saturday, 24 October 2026): Wehen Wiesbaden win 50%, draw 24%, Sonnenhof Grossaspach win 26%. Expected goals (xG): Wehen Wiesbaden 2.03, Sonnenhof Grossaspach 1.45. Most likely score: 1-1 (9%). Over 2.5 goals 67%, both teams to score 67%. Double chance: Wehen Wiesbaden or draw 74%, Sonnenhof Grossaspach or draw 50%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
TEXT:
With a 50% win probability, Wehen Wiesbaden stands as the favored side against Sonnenhof Grossaspach. Yet, Wiesbaden's perceived advantage may not fully capture the complexities of this clash. Grossaspach's penchant for high press and possession could disrupt Wiesbaden's balanced and physical approach, making them tricky opponents despite their lower 26% win likelihood.
In terms of expected goals, Wehen Wiesbaden holds a slight edge with 2.03 versus Grossaspach's 1.45. This suggests a potentially tight contest, with both teams likely finding the net given the 67% probability for both teams to score. A 1-1 or 2-1 scoreline, each at 9% likelihood, reflects the anticipated competitive nature of this encounter.
The weather, with 4.0 mm of rain forecasted, will likely play a role in dampening offensive exploits, possibly affecting the fluidity of Grossaspach's pressing game. However, this factor is already incorporated into the model's expectations, which still indicate a 67% chance for over 2.5 goals. This leans towards a match with multiple scoring opportunities despite the adverse conditions.
Grossaspach's pressing style has aided them in creating chances quickly, but their defense remains vulnerable, evidenced by an xGA of 1.9. In contrast, Wiesbaden's xGA of 1.4 suggests a more robust defensive setup, which could be crucial in a match where both teams are expected to be on the scoreboard.
For bettors, the real edge lies in the over 3.5 market, with Betsafe offering odds of 2.28, translating to a 4% value edge based on model ratings. For the more adventurous, the over 4.5 goals at 3.9 with Betsafe and Nordicbet provides a 5% value edge, capitalizing on the potential for a high-scoring affair if the match opens up.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Wehen Wiesbaden | X | 2 · Sonnenhof Grossaspach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.92 | 3.65 | 3.30 |
| LeoVegas | 1.92 | 3.65 | 3.30 |
| Nordicbet | 1.92 | 3.65 | 3.30 |
| Pinnacle | 1.92 | 4.00 | 3.51 |
Odds updated 24 Oct, 13:36
1.88 → 1.92
3.89 → 4.00
3.53 → 3.51
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 17/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Wehen Wiesbaden | Sonnenhof Grossaspach |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 12 | 12 |
| xPoints | 14.9 | 13 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.31 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.26 | 0.32 |
| Playing style | Wehen Wiesbaden | Sonnenhof Grossaspach |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.5 | 0.62 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 0.97 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 333 | 359 |
| Passes against per match | 364 | 320 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.1 | 19.8 |
| Long balls per match | 36 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Wehen Wiesbaden | Sonnenhof Grossaspach |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.11 | 0.1 |
| Corners per match | 4.8 | 5.6 |
| Corners against per match | 6.2 | 5.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.38 | 0.36 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.6 |
| Other | Wehen Wiesbaden | Sonnenhof Grossaspach |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Florian Stritzel (Wehen Wiesbaden) | Maximilian Reule (Sonnenhof Grossaspach) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 28 | 37 |
| Save % | 67% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 37% | 53% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Wehen Wiesbaden a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Wehen Wiesbaden 50%, draw 24%, Sonnenhof Grossaspach 26%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 9% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 67% and under at 33%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 67% according to the model.
The model expects 2.03 goals (xG) for Wehen Wiesbaden and 1.45 for Sonnenhof Grossaspach, 3.47 in total.
Wehen Wiesbaden or draw (1X) 74%, Sonnenhof Grossaspach or draw (X2) 50% and no draw (12) 76%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.