01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Verl or draw (1X)63%
- Over 1.5 goals87%
3. Liga7°12 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Verl vs Wehen Wiesbaden (3. Liga, Saturday, 31 October 2026): Verl win 44%, draw 25%, Wehen Wiesbaden win 31%. Expected goals (xG): Verl 1.82, Wehen Wiesbaden 1.74. Most likely score: 1-1 (9%). Over 2.5 goals 69%, both teams to score 69%. Double chance: Verl or draw 69%, Wehen Wiesbaden or draw 56%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Verl's push for dominance on their home turf hits a complex note when they welcome Wehen Wiesbaden. Despite the hosts' knack for finding the net in 11 successive league outings, the visitors bring a physical and balanced approach that might unsettle Verl's possession-based game. The expected goals slightly favor Verl at 1.82 to Wehen's 1.74, but the overall strategic picture indicates a more nuanced battle.
The head-to-head record, a small sample of four matches, shows neither side gaining a clear upper hand, though Verl has shown resilience with a single win and two draws. Meanwhile, data points to Wehen's advantage in expected points and goals against metrics, suggesting a more robust defensive setup compared to Verl's vulnerability at the back. The hosts' defensive frailties, evidenced by their higher expected goals against, could be tested by Wehen's physicality.
Significantly, Wehen Wiesbaden outpaces their opponents in quick transitions, as indicated by their superior xG within 8 seconds of winning the ball. This dynamic could prove crucial against Verl's preference for controlled possession, potentially leading to quick, decisive counters when the home side loses the ball.
With a hefty 69% chance of over 2.5 goals and both teams likely to score, it's easy to envision a match that sees both sides finding the net. The most probable scorelines, including a 1-1 draw and narrow victories for either side, underscore the evenly matched nature of this clash.
Where the betting value stands out is with Verl at a 44% model probability at odds that may undervalue their chances. However, the undercurrents suggest caution; while Verl leans favorite, Wehen's counter-threat and superior metrics in transitional play offer a compelling counterbalance.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Verl | X | 2 · Wehen Wiesbaden |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 20% 2.72 | 3.55 | 2.25 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 20% 2.72 | 3.55 | 2.25 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 25% 2.84 | 3.71 | 2.23 |
Odds updated 25 Oct, 05:59
2.68 → 2.84
3.71 → 3.71
2.34 → 2.23
Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 24/10/2026 → 25/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on 3. Liga data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Verl | Wehen Wiesbaden |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 12 | 12 |
| xPoints | 9 | 14.9 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.31 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.34 | 0.26 |
| Playing style | Verl | Wehen Wiesbaden |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.61 | 0.5 |
| xT per match | 1 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.97 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 19 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.35 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.77 | 0.68 |
| Passes per match | 464 | 333 |
| Passes against per match | 266 | 364 |
| Switches of play per match | 30.9 | 20.1 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 36 |
| Set pieces | Verl | Wehen Wiesbaden |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.11 |
| Corners per match | 5.4 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.4 | 6.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.38 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.55 |
| Other | Verl | Wehen Wiesbaden |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Timo Schlieck (Verl) | Florian Stritzel (Wehen Wiesbaden) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 35 | 28 |
| Save % | 66% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 37% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Verl a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Verl 44%, draw 25%, Wehen Wiesbaden 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 9% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 69% and under at 31%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 69% according to the model.
The model expects 1.82 goals (xG) for Verl and 1.74 for Wehen Wiesbaden, 3.56 in total.
Verl or draw (1X) 69%, Wehen Wiesbaden or draw (X2) 56% and no draw (12) 75%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.