01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Girona or draw (1X)65%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Segunda División21°12 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The narrow 39% model probability for Girona sets the stage for a tightly contested matchup against Castellon, who have a close 35% chance of victory. Despite the minor statistical edge for the hosts, Castellon’s form and expected goals suggest they might have the upper hand. With 10 points compared to Girona's 7, the visitors have shown more consistent results. In terms of xG and xGA, Castellon again holds the advantage, boasting a higher xG per match of 1.9 and a lower xGA of 0.62, compared to Girona’s 1.3 and 1.2, respectively.
A small head-to-head sample limits its usefulness, making current form and expected goals more telling. The most likely scorelines indicate a close contest, with 1-1 at 13%, followed by 1-0 at 9% in favor of Girona. The slight edge towards a low-scoring outcome is reflected in the expected goals figures—1.39 for Girona and 1.32 for Castellon—alongside a lean toward under 2.5 goals, sitting at 49%.
The sharpest angle comes from the value odds offered on an away win. With Castellon rated by the model at a 35% win probability, backing them at 3.1 odds with Betsafe, Betsson, or Nordicbet carries a 9% edge. Given their superior form and xG metrics, this angle is worth considering.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Girona | X | 2 · Castellon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.08 | 3.40 | EV+ 10% 3.15 |
| Betsson | 2.08 | 3.40 | EV+ 10% 3.15 |
| Nordicbet | 2.08 | 3.40 | EV+ 10% 3.15 |
| Pinnacle | 2.08 | 3.60 | EV+ 18% 3.37 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:39
2.15 → 2.08
3.55 → 3.60
3.25 → 3.37
1.72 → 1.65
Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 07/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Girona | Castellon |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 10 |
| xPoints | 5.6 | 7.4 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 0.62 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.3 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.3 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Girona | Castellon |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.55 | 0.73 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 0.89 | 0.66 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 18 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 424 | 505 |
| Passes against per match | 385 | 270 |
| Switches of play per match | 28.7 | 22.6 |
| Long balls per match | 36 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Girona | Castellon |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.1 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 4 | 5.8 |
| Corners against per match | 1.8 | 3.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.12 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.3 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.14 | 0.71 |
| Other | Girona | Castellon |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Paulo Gazzaniga (Girona) | Romain Matthys (Castellon) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 6 |
| Save % | 69% | 86% |
| xG prevented | 47% | 76% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Girona a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Girona 39%, draw 26%, Castellon 35%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.