Süper Lig15°0,3 mm3 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    AmedsporAmedsporPossession control
    vs
    EyüpsporEyüpsporLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Amedspor (69%)

    Amedspor vs Eyüpspor · Süper Lig

    1 · Amedspor 69%X 20%11% Eyüpspor · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for Amedspor vs Eyüpspor (Süper Lig, Sunday, 1 November 2026): Amedspor win 69%, draw 20%, Eyüpspor win 11%. Expected goals (xG): Amedspor 2.11, Eyüpspor 0.81. Most likely score: 2-0 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 56%, both teams to score 49%. Double chance: Amedspor or draw 89%, Eyüpspor or draw 31%. Prediction updated Saturday, 24 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Amedspor – Eyüpspor

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    TEXT: In the clash between Amedspor and Eyüpspor, the numbers paint a stark picture. Amed, with a commanding 69% probability of winning, are the clear favorites against an Eyüpspor side struggling with five consecutive defeats. The hosts' strength lies in their possession-oriented play, expected to dictate the tempo and create chances, while the visitors will likely resort to a low defensive block and direct counter-attacks — a strategy that hasn't served them well recently.

    Amed's unbeaten run in their last six league matches underscores their stability and form. They have accumulated 17 points, dwarfing Eyüpspor's mere 3. In expected goals terms, the hosts average 1.6 per match compared to the visitors' 0.71, signaling a substantial offensive edge. Meanwhile, defensively, Amed concedes only 0.85 xGA per match, a stark contrast to Eyüpspor's worrying 1.9 xGA, indicating vulnerabilities that the home side is well-positioned to exploit.

    Although the model suggests a 56% chance of over 2.5 goals, the likelihood of goals might be tempered by Eyüpspor's defensive approach. Still, with Amed's expected goals at 2.11 and a solid history of converting their chances, a 2-0 scoreline seems probable. The expectation is for Amed to control proceedings, limiting Eyüpspor's opportunities and keeping defensive errors at bay.

    Model projections lean heavily toward Amed, reflecting consistent form against a side in disarray, though no specific betting odds are available to confirm value here.

    AmedsporAmedspor
    Form DWWDW
    League ranking xG #6xGA #2xT #14xP/match #2Points #2
    Key players
    • Lumbardh DellovaCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.08
    • Mehmet YesilCBxG 0.00 · xT 0.07
    • Diaa Sabi'aCAMxG 0.30 · xT 0.11
    EyüpsporEyüpspor
    Form LLLLL
    League ranking xG #18xGA #17xT #18xP/match #18Points #18
    Key players
    • Zak Kennedy JulesCBxG 0.18 · xT 0.06
    • Taskin IlterCAMxG 0.02 · xT 0.01
    • Massanga MatondoCDMxG 0.03 · xT 0.04

    Match prediction: Amedspor – Eyüpspor

    Predicted score matrix

    Eyüpspor →
    Amedspor →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.6%
    0–14.1%
    0–21.8%
    0–30.5%
    0–4+0.1%
    1
    1–011.1%
    1–19.5%
    1–23.7%
    1–31.0%
    1–4+0.2%
    2
    2–012.0%
    2–19.7%
    2–24.0%
    2–31.1%
    2–4+0.3%
    3
    3–08.4%
    3–16.9%
    3–22.8%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–07.3%
    4+–15.9%
    4+–22.4%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.2-012%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.2-110%
    4. 4.1-19%
    5. 5.3-08%
    Expected goals
    2,11–0,81
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,9
    Under 2,544%
    –
    Over 2,556%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Amedspor to win69%
    • Over 1.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    56%

    Fair odds

    1.79

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Amedspor to win69%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Samuel Leo Beat Ballet to score35%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Samuel Leo Beat Ballet to score35%
    • Chandrel Géraud Massanga Matondo to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Amed are unbeaten in their last 6 league matches.
    • Eyupspor have lost 5 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Amedspor
    Eyüpspor
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Amedspor (18–9)
    Eyüpspor (2–22)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Amedspor
    David Robert Bates: 204 passningar, xT 0.21BatesUmut Meras: 186 passningar, xT 0.39MerasLumbardh Dellova: 163 passningar, xT 0.22DellovaRayan Ny Aina Arnaldo Raveloson: 153 passningar, xT 0.48RavelosonAlban-Marc Lafont: 134 passningar, xT 0.12LafontErmal Krasniqi: 134 passningar, xT 0.62KrasniqiDiaa Sabi'a: 118 passningar, xT 0.51Sabi'aFurkan Soyalp: 111 passningar, xT 0.22SoyalpSamuel Leo Beat Ballet: 92 passningar, xT 0.12BalletGift Emmanuel Orban: 58 passningar, xT 0.07OrbanAmadou Cissé: 57 passningar, xT 0.11Cissé
    Eyüpspor
    Massanga Matondo: 251 passningar, xT 0.21MatondoZak Kennedy Jules: 236 passningar, xT 0.42JulesAnil Yasar: 145 passningar, xT 0.06YasarSimone Giordano: 144 passningar, xT 0.55GiordanoTaskin Ilter: 131 passningar, xT 0IlterTalha Ülvan: 130 passningar, xT 0.25ÜlvanHorațiu Alexandru Moldovan: 115 passningar, xT 0.09MoldovanJawad El Yamiq: 113 passningar, xT 0.29YamiqDavid José Soares Oliveira Furtado Costa: 108 passningar, xT -0.11CostaCharles-André Raux Yao: 82 passningar, xT 0.02YaoBilal Boutobba: 79 passningar, xT 0.03Boutobba
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Amedspor
    David Robert Bates: 204 passningar, xT 0.21BatesUmut Meras: 186 passningar, xT 0.39MerasLumbardh Dellova: 163 passningar, xT 0.22DellovaRayan Ny Aina Arnaldo Raveloson: 153 passningar, xT 0.48RavelosonAlban-Marc Lafont: 134 passningar, xT 0.12LafontErmal Krasniqi: 134 passningar, xT 0.62KrasniqiDiaa Sabi'a: 118 passningar, xT 0.51Sabi'aFurkan Soyalp: 111 passningar, xT 0.22SoyalpSamuel Leo Beat Ballet: 92 passningar, xT 0.12BalletGift Emmanuel Orban: 58 passningar, xT 0.07OrbanAmadou Cissé: 57 passningar, xT 0.11Cissé
    Eyüpspor
    Massanga Matondo: 251 passningar, xT 0.21MatondoZak Kennedy Jules: 236 passningar, xT 0.42JulesAnil Yasar: 145 passningar, xT 0.06YasarSimone Giordano: 144 passningar, xT 0.55GiordanoTaskin Ilter: 131 passningar, xT 0IlterTalha Ülvan: 130 passningar, xT 0.25ÜlvanHorațiu Alexandru Moldovan: 115 passningar, xT 0.09MoldovanJawad El Yamiq: 113 passningar, xT 0.29YamiqDavid José Soares Oliveira Furtado Costa: 108 passningar, xT -0.11CostaCharles-André Raux Yao: 82 passningar, xT 0.02YaoBilal Boutobba: 79 passningar, xT 0.03Boutobba

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceAmedsporEyüpspor
    Points173
    xPoints156.4
    xG per match1.60.71
    xGA per match0.851.9
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.30.11
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.140.3
    Playing styleAmedsporEyüpspor
    Build-up efficiency0.340.27
    Field tilt0.450.41
    xT per match0.830.43
    xTA per match0.61.1
    Won balls, offensive half1919
    Pressing intensity0.220.24
    Pressing efficiency0.290.25
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.220.17
    Entries into the box per match108
    Entries into the box against711
    Pass completion %0.770.79
    Pass completion % under pressure0.730.75
    Passes per match325352
    Passes against per match367363
    Switches of play per match2131.6
    Long balls per match2833
    Set piecesAmedsporEyüpspor
    xG from free kicks0.10.19
    Corners per match4.33.6
    Corners against per match4.35
    xG per corner0.040.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.430.55
    First touch, defensive corners %0.660.5
    OtherAmedsporEyüpspor
    Throw-in control0.750.69
    The goalkeepersAlban-Marc Lafont (Amedspor)Horațiu Alexandru Moldovan (Eyüpspor)
    Saves2019
    Save %69%53%
    xG prevented40%23%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Amedspor vs Eyüpspor according to our model?

    The model gives Amedspor a 69% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Amedspor 69%, draw 20%, Eyüpspor 11%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Amedspor vs Eyüpspor?

    The model expects 2.11 goals (xG) for Amedspor and 0.81 for Eyüpspor, 2.93 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Amedspor or draw (1X) 89%, Eyüpspor or draw (X2) 31% and no draw (12) 80%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.