01 · 2 legs
Safe
- AGF to win59%
- Over 1.5 goals88%
Conference League11°9,0 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for AGF vs Egnatia (Conference League, Thursday, 22 October 2026): AGF win 59%, draw 17%, Egnatia win 24%. Expected goals (xG): AGF 2.35, Egnatia 1.30. Most likely score: 2-1 (9%). Over 2.5 goals 71%, both teams to score 66%. Double chance: AGF or draw 76%, Egnatia or draw 41%. Prediction updated Wednesday, 14 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
AGF enters this fixture with a notable 59% probability of victory, reflecting the model's overall edge for the hosts. Yet, as we delve into the form book, the tale unfolds slightly differently. The visitors have a slender edge in recent form, with a point on the board against AGF's zero. But numbers alone can mislead; the hosts' expected goals tally of 2.35 dwarfs Egnatia's 1.30, hinting at potential underperformance ripe for correction.
Despite their lean xPoints deficit, Egnatia has shown a knack for exceeding expectations in a tight match-up. They average a subtle edge with 1.2 xPoints and 0.8 xG per match compared to AGF's 0.9 and 0.62 respectively. However, these figures are modest and suggest a low ceiling for an upset. Defensive frailties aren't glamorous, but Egnatia also edges AGF in xGA, 1.4 to 1.7, indicating both teams are prone to conceding.
With a whopping 71% chance for over 2.5 goals and both teams likely to score at 66%, offense is on the cards despite the rainy forecast which might temper some attacking flair. The model's most likely result is a 2-1 win for AGF, aligning with the idea of a match decided by fine margins. The damp conditions, however, could see the game tighten, reducing the goal expectation slightly.
For those seeking value, there's a bold angle on offer. Over 4.5 goals is priced enticingly at odds of 4.9 with Betsafe and Nordicbet, and 4.7 with LeoVegas, offering a significant edge as the model assesses the probability at 30%. It's a big ask, given the defensive tendencies, but the value is undeniable if you're willing to take a calculated risk. This is not a bet for the faint-hearted, yet for those who relish the thrill of defying the norm, it might just pay off handsomely.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · AGF | X | 2 · Egnatia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | 1.64 | 4.00 | EV+ 27% 5.40 |
| Betsafe | 1.45 | 4.30 | EV+ 48% 6.30 |
| LeoVegas | 1.47 | 4.40 | EV+ 41% 6.00 |
| Nordicbet | 1.45 | 4.30 | EV+ 48% 6.30 |
| Paddy Power | 1.57 | 3.80 | EV+ 18% 5.00 |
| Pinnacle | 1.47 | 4.47 | EV+ 58% 6.70 |
Odds updated 22 Oct, 08:08
1.52 → 1.47
4.13 → 4.47
5.99 → 6.70
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 20/10/2026 → 22/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | AGF | Egnatia |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 1 |
| xPoints | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| xG per match | 0.62 | 0.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.12 | 0.22 |
| Playing style | AGF | Egnatia |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.16 |
| Field tilt | 0.26 | 0.49 |
| xT per match | 0.2 | 0.98 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 17 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.4 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 5 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 21 | 21 |
| Pass completion % | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 439 | 342 |
| Passes against per match | 478 | 284 |
| Switches of play per match | 10.2 | 30 |
| Long balls per match | 15 | 39 |
| Set pieces | AGF | Egnatia |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 2 | 2.1 |
| Corners against per match | 11.3 | 6.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 1 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.83 |
| Other | AGF | Egnatia |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.81 | 0.53 |
| The goalkeepers | Mads Hedenstad Christiansen (AGF) | Mario Dajsinani (Egnatia) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3 | 3 |
| Save % | 75% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 75% | 75% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives AGF a 59% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: AGF 59%, draw 17%, Egnatia 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 9% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 71% and under at 29%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 66% according to the model.
The model expects 2.35 goals (xG) for AGF and 1.30 for Egnatia, 3.66 in total.
AGF or draw (1X) 76%, Egnatia or draw (X2) 41% and no draw (12) 83%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.