01 · 2 legs
Safe
- FC København to win71%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Conference League18°17 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · How the predictions work
71%. That's the probability FC Copenhagen rolls over Debrecen — a staggering number for a match of this nature. Yet the icy winds of Copenhagen’s current form might tell a different story. Despite the high probability for a home win, this clash has the makings of a tighter affair than the numbers suggest. The expected goals lay it bare: FC Copenhagen at 2.10, Debrecen at 1.04. But here's the rub — in terms of xPoints, Debrecen edges it with 3.4 to FC Copenhagen's 2.7. The Hungarian side has shown a knack for squeezing more out of their chances, whereas the Danes, though dominant in possession numbers, appear vulnerable at the back.
FC Copenhagen’s counter-attacking prowess and preference for crosses might find joy against Debrecen's high press, but the visitors’ defensive solidity could stifle the spectacle. The model sees a 61% chance of over 2.5 goals, yet Debrecen's tight ship at 1.2 xGA per match hints at a potential suppression of the scoreline. That said, the Danes' likelihood of pinching a goal or two remains high given Debrecen's aggressive style, which could open up spaces behind.
Debrecen, with their possession-based play and impressive xG per match at 1.7, represent more than their meager 12% chance of victory. If they can convert possession into tangible threats, a 1-1 draw isn't far-fetched. The small sample of head-to-heads doesn't weigh heavily here, and the weather isn't in play to muddy the waters.
Ends are often where the best inch of betting value lies. The bookmaker Bet365 offers FC Copenhagen at enticing odds of 1.40 to win — while the model heavily favors this outcome, the true edge might lie in a more nuanced market given the underlying data. The 10% chance of a 1-1 result, coupled with both teams likely to score at 57%, may provide a shrewd alternative punt.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | FC København | Debrecen |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 4 |
| xPoints | 2.7 | 3.4 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.37 | 0.42 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.28 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | FC København | Debrecen |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.23 | 0.56 |
| xT per match | 0.64 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.35 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 298 | 297 |
| Passes against per match | 464 | 301 |
| Switches of play per match | 25.2 | 20.6 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 37 |
| Set pieces | FC København | Debrecen |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 2.5 | 6.8 |
| Corners against per match | 7.9 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.07 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Other | FC København | Debrecen |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.85 | 0.65 |
| The goalkeepers | Rúnar Alex Rúnarsson (FC København) | Debrecen |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | – |
| Save % | 57% | – |
| xG prevented | 49% | – |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | – |
The model gives FC København a 71% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: FC København 71%, draw 17%, Debrecen 12%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.