Conference League30°12 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    GentGentBalanced & physical
    11
    IFK GöteborgIFK Göteborg
    The model's lean: 1 · Gent (40%)Best value by the model: 2 · IFK Göteborg @ 5.90 (+111 %)

    Gent vs IFK Göteborg · Conference League

    1 · Gent 40%X 25%36% IFK Göteborg · 2

    Analysis: GentIFK Göteborg

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    KAA Gent's 40% win probability is the highest in this match's model, yet it’s Goteborg who steal the spotlight with a tantalizing value edge. Having odds of 5.54 at Pinnacle reflects a striking 98% edge — a rare find for punters eyeing profit amidst the uncertainty of European nights. While the Belgian side seems the marginal favorite, the margins are slim and the real betting gold glistens with the Swedish visitors.

    Goteborg, with a respectable 36% likelihood according to the model, aren’t simply here to make up the numbers. Their potential to disrupt Gent's evening leans heavily on their ability to exploit defensive lapses. The model’s expected goals suggest a tightly-knit confrontation: Gent’s 1.58 slightly edges Goteborg’s 1.42. However, both teams to score comes in at a robust 61%, painting a picture of a match destined to see goals from each end.

    Weather hasn’t been flagged to impact proceedings, so the 58% chance of over 2.5 goals must be considered without meteorological interference. With the most likely scoreline pegged at 1-1, there’s an implication of competitiveness and a very open game, thanks in part to Goteborg's equally weighted attacking potential against Gent.

    Goteborg presents a seductive EV+ opportunity at both Betsafe and Betsson, each offering odds of 5.4 — a chance to back the away side with a 93% edge. It’s a scenario bettors dream of, particularly when the model and bookmakers’ odds diverge so distinctly.

    Ultimately, while Gent might seem the safer choice based on sheer probability, the value in Goteborg’s odds is too good to ignore. A 2-1 or even a 1-2 scoreline isn't far-fetched, and with generous odds, swinging with Goteborg might just be the shrewd play.

    GentGent
    Form LWLLW
    League ranking xG #29xGA #20xT #18xP/match #19Points #22
    Key players
    • Tsuyoshi WatanabeCBxG 0.17 · xT 0.09
    • Omri GandelmanCAMxG 0.49 · xT -0.01
    • Momodou Lamin SonkoLWxG 0.13 · xT 0.09
    IFK GöteborgIFK Göteborg
    Final score
    11
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Gent 40% · Draw 25% · IFK Göteborg 36%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - IFK GöteborgBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 23,50fair 9,25+154 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - KAA GentBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 4,82fair 7,53-36 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: GentIFK Göteborg

    Predicted score matrix

    IFK Göteborg
    Gent
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.3%
    0–16.8%
    0–25.0%
    0–32.4%
    0–4+1.2%
    1
    1–07.5%
    1–111.5%
    1–27.9%
    1–33.8%
    1–4+1.8%
    2
    2–06.2%
    2–18.8%
    2–26.3%
    2–33.0%
    2–4+1.5%
    3
    3–03.3%
    3–14.6%
    3–23.3%
    3–31.6%
    3–4+0.8%
    4+
    4+–01.8%
    4+–12.6%
    4+–21.9%
    4+–30.9%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-28%
    4. 4.1-08%
    5. 5.0-17%
    Expected goals
    1,581,42
    Both teams to score
    61%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,0
    Under 2,542%
    @2.02
    Over 2,558%
    @1.74EV+0%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Gent or draw (1X)66%
    • Over 1.5 goals80%

    Combined probability

    53%

    Fair odds

    1.88

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Gent or draw (1X)66%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Ibrahima Cisse to score28%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score61%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Ibrahima Cisse to score28%
    • Matties Volckaert to be booked18%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · IFK Göteborg36% probability@5.90BetsafeEV+111%reference odds
    • 2 · IFK Göteborg36% probability@5.90BetssonEV+111%reference odds
    • 2 · IFK Göteborg36% probability@5.90NordicbetEV+111%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · GentX2 · IFK Göteborg
    Betsafe1.46
    EV+ 7%
    4.35
    EV+ 111%
    5.90
    Betsson1.46
    EV+ 7%
    4.35
    EV+ 111%
    5.90
    Nordicbet1.46
    EV+ 7%
    4.35
    EV+ 111%
    5.90
    Pinnacle1.494.07
    EV+ 98%
    5.56

    Odds updated 13 Aug, 11:35

    Odds movement

    1+1 %
    64 %59 %

    1.481.49

    X-1 %
    25 %20 %

    4.104.07

    2-1 %
    19 %14 %

    5.605.56

    Over 2,50 %
    56 %51 %

    1.741.74

    Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 09/08/2026 → 12/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    When goals are scored and conceded 2024
    Gent (911)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Gent
    Tsuyoshi Watanabe: 304 passningar, xT 0.54WatanabeAtsuki Ito: 180 passningar, xT 0.28ItoMathias Delorge: 179 passningar, xT 0.35DelorgeStefan Mitrović: 178 passningar, xT 0.19MitrovićSven Kums: 174 passningar, xT 0.46KumsTiago Araujo: 166 passningar, xT 0.96AraujoJordan Torunarigha: 158 passningar, xT 0.4TorunarighaArchibald Norman Brown: 112 passningar, xT 0.52BrownMatisse Samoise: 97 passningar, xT 0.34SamoiseGilles De Meyer: 92 passningar, xT 0.33MeyerDavy Roef: 90 passningar, xT 0.09Roef
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Gent
    Tsuyoshi Watanabe: 304 passningar, xT 0.54WatanabeAtsuki Ito: 180 passningar, xT 0.28ItoMathias Delorge: 179 passningar, xT 0.35DelorgeStefan Mitrović: 178 passningar, xT 0.19MitrovićSven Kums: 174 passningar, xT 0.46KumsTiago Araujo: 166 passningar, xT 0.96AraujoJordan Torunarigha: 158 passningar, xT 0.4TorunarighaArchibald Norman Brown: 112 passningar, xT 0.52BrownMatisse Samoise: 97 passningar, xT 0.34SamoiseGilles De Meyer: 92 passningar, xT 0.33MeyerDavy Roef: 90 passningar, xT 0.09Roef
    The goalkeepersDavy Roef (Gent)IFK Göteborg
    Saves28
    Save %76%
    xG prevented73%
    Claims0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Gent vs IFK Göteborg according to our model?

    The model gives Gent a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gent 40%, draw 25%, IFK Göteborg 36%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 58% and under at 42%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 61% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.