Champions League xG table 2026/27

    The official table shows what has happened. The xG table shows how the teams in the Champions League have performed beneath the surface: expected goals for and against, expected points (xP) and playing style. The gap between points and xP shows which teams are over- and underrated right now — and that is usually where the value lies.

    League table2026/27

    PosTeamPSW–D–LGF–GAxPxGxGAxGDFTStyle
    1Fenerbahçe1694–4–111–1215,413,99,1+4,854 %Counter-attacks & crosses
    2Bodø/Glimt1264–0–213–128,69,99,0+0,960 %Possession & high press
    3Paris Saint-Germain933–0–014–55,99,45,6+3,863 %Possession & high press
    4Aston Villa933–0–012–37,38,93,5+5,450 %Balanced & physical
    5Liverpool933–0–012–75,27,13,5+3,660 %Possession & high press
    6Real Madrid933–0–010–57,08,53,8+4,741 %Low block & direct
    7Real Betis933–0–07–46,05,72,6+3,170 %Balanced & physical
    8Sabah973–0–414–128,110,414,8−4,445 %Counter-attacks & crosses
    9VfB Stuttgart732–1–07–25,46,52,4+4,168 %Possession control
    10Arsenal732–1–06–25,97,32,6+4,782 %Possession & high press
    11AEK Athens752–1–27–86,97,56,8+0,739 %Balanced & physical
    12FC Barcelona632–0–111–64,77,03,7+3,372 %Possession & high press
    13Como632–0–110–55,64,32,4+1,950 %Balanced & physical
    14Manchester City632–0–19–56,28,42,8+5,680 %Possession & high press
    15Club Brugge632–0–19–63,98,08,4−0,453 %Balanced & physical
    16Sporting CP632–0–17–45,86,14,7+1,442 %Low block & direct
    17Sturm Graz642–0–26–36,26,66,2+0,435 %Low block & direct
    18Borussia Dortmund632–0–15–45,67,53,5+4,056 %Possession & high press
    19LASK652–0–311–136,99,79,4+0,349 %Low block & direct
    20AGF642–0–27–104,64,66,9−2,336 %Counter-attacks & crosses
    21Bayern München531–2–010–56,48,42,8+5,674 %Possession & high press
    22Dinamo Zagreb541–2–17–85,27,24,6+2,679 %Possession & high press
    23Viking551–2–210–124,35,213,3−8,124 %Low block & direct
    24Roma431–1–18–54,36,43,0+3,478 %Possession & high press
    25Lyon441–1–26–56,15,84,4+1,456 %Counter-attacks & crosses
    26Atlético de Madrid431–1–14–33,92,73,5−0,844 %Counter-attacks & crosses
    27Shakhtar Donetsk431–1–14–33,92,62,60,055 %Possession control
    28Vikingur Reykjavik421–1–03–23,54,02,9+1,155 %Possession & high press
    29PSV Eindhoven431–1–12–23,34,04,2−0,263 %Possession control
    30Levski Sofia431–1–11–42,92,45,4−3,040 %Balanced & physical
    31NEC441–1–23–75,45,25,4−0,241 %Counter-attacks & crosses
    32Slovan Bratislava451–1–34–154,34,515,0−10,525 %Low block & direct
    33Villarreal331–0–28–83,24,26,8−2,640 %Counter-attacks & crosses
    34Lech Poznań321–0–15–53,33,22,3+0,957 %Possession control
    35Manchester United331–0–25–64,34,73,2+1,556 %Balanced & physical
    36Inter331–0–25–63,16,27,4−1,261 %Balanced & physical
    37Celtic321–0–14–51,31,45,9−4,543 %Possession control
    38Napoli331–0–25–72,73,67,2−3,627 %Balanced & physical
    39Hapoel Be'er Sheva321–0–14–62,62,93,4−0,559 %Possession & high press
    40Sparta Praha321–0–12–41,61,83,7−1,937 %Possession & high press
    41Galatasaray331–0–26–92,93,95,6−1,740 %Possession & high press
    42Feyenoord331–0–24–82,62,25,5−3,334 %Balanced & physical
    43Lens331–0–23–72,75,56,5−1,063 %Balanced & physical
    44RB Leipzig331–0–23–83,34,36,6−2,343 %Balanced & physical
    45Thun120–1–13–43,31,82,8−1,019 %Low block & direct
    46Győri ETO120–1–12–32,22,94,0−1,145 %Low block & direct
    47Celje120–1–12–32,63,42,7+0,752 %Possession control
    48Górnik Zabrze120–1–11–21,40,83,9−3,128 %Low block & direct
    49Olympiacos120–1–11–22,01,72,8−1,145 %Balanced & physical
    50Slavia Praha130–1–24–74,75,74,3+1,450 %Possession control
    51Union Saint-Gilloise010–0–12–31,21,42,4−1,018 %Low block & direct
    52Kairat Almaty010–0–10–11,91,30,4+0,974 %Possession & high press
    53Porto030–0–32–62,62,46,6−4,220 %Low block & direct
    54Lille030–0–34–103,02,55,2−2,728 %Balanced & physical
    55Hearts020–0–20–60,82,45,1−2,773 %Possession control

    Teams in Champions League

    FenerbahçeBodø/GlimtParis Saint-GermainAston VillaLiverpoolReal MadridReal BetisSabahVfB StuttgartArsenalAEK AthensFC BarcelonaComoManchester CityClub BruggeSporting CPSturm GrazBorussia DortmundLASKAGFBayern MünchenDinamo ZagrebVikingRomaLyonAtlético de MadridShakhtar DonetskVikingur ReykjavikPSV EindhovenLevski SofiaNECSlovan BratislavaVillarrealLech PoznańManchester UnitedInterCelticNapoliHapoel Be'er ShevaSparta PrahaGalatasarayFeyenoordLensRB LeipzigThunGyőri ETOCeljeGórnik ZabrzeOlympiacosSlavia PrahaUnion Saint-GilloiseKairat AlmatyPortoLilleHearts
    Predictions & all fixtures in Champions League

    Frequently asked questions about the xG table

    What is xG?

    xG, or expected goals, measures chance quality: every shot is given a value between 0 and 1 based on how often similar shots have historically been scored — the distance, the angle, the type of pass before it, the body part and the pressure from defenders. The total over a match or a season shows how many goals a team should have scored.

    What is xP and why does it differ from the points table?

    xP, or expected points, is worked out by playing each match thousands of times from the two teams' xG in that match and counting how often it ends in a win, a draw or a defeat. A team sitting well above its xP in the Champions League has had the margins on its side — and tends to lose ground over the coming rounds.

    How often is the xG table updated?

    After every round played in Champions League. The table is built on the same model as our match predictions, so the figures here are exactly the ones behind the predictions for the next round.

    What do field tilt (FT) and playing style mean?

    Field tilt is a team's share of the match's passes in the final third — a measure of who dominates territorially. Playing style is a clustering of the team's season profile in possession, pressing and directness, showing how the team wins (or loses) its points.