01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Almere City to win61%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Eerste Divisie11°14,1 mm28 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
One issue: xPoints show an edge for Eindhoven (7.5 vs 10.4), which the text omits—this is a notable fact contradicting the narrative of Almere's dominance. Otherwise, all numbers match.
Corrected text:
Two teams, Jong Almere City and FC Eindhoven, face off with little to separate them in recent form. A small sample size in head-to-head matchups, which weighs less than the current season dynamics. Jong Almere holds a slight advantage in points with 12 over Eindhoven's 11, but the expected goals (xG) tell a nuanced story. Almere City generates 1.4 xG per match, surpassing Eindhoven's 0.98, yet both defenses leak goals, with Almere City allowing 1.7 xGA compared to Eindhoven's 1.8. Notably, xPoints favor Eindhoven (10.4) over Almere City (7.5), suggesting Eindhoven may be undervalued relative to underlying performance.
Despite these defensive frailties, the model heavily favors the hosts. Almere City has a 61% chance of victory, with the most likely scorelines pointing to a 2-0 or 2-1 win. When factoring in the expected goals—2.21 for Almere City against a meager 0.90 for the visitors—it's little surprise. Eindhoven's reliance on counter-attacks and crosses will likely struggle against Almere's low defensive line and direct play.
The high probability of over 2.5 goals at 60% and both teams scoring at 53% underscores a potential for goals, yet the weather forecast of 14.1 mm rain could suppress attacking flair, a factor already considered in the model's numbers. Such nuances make this clash intriguing, with Almere City positioned as the likely victor.
For bettors, the sharpest angle lies in the market discrepancies. Both Betsafe and Nordicbet offer significant value on the under 1.5 goals at odds of 7.3, where the model estimates an 18% probability—a 31% edge. Given the conditions and defensive profiles, backing under 2.5 goals at 3.15 also presents value, with a 25% edge. In a game where Almere is favored, the under-goal markets provide the most compelling opportunities.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Almere City | X | 2 · FC Eindhoven |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.43 | 4.55 | EV+ 16% 6.30 |
| LeoVegas | 1.42 | 4.70 | EV+ 6% 5.75 |
| Nordicbet | 1.43 | 4.55 | EV+ 16% 6.30 |
Odds updated 4 Oct, 13:35
1.44 → 1.42
4.80 → 4.70
5.40 → 5.75
1.31 → 1.35
LeoVegas · 3 recorded price levels · 03/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Almere City | FC Eindhoven |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 12 | 11 |
| xPoints | 7.5 | 10.4 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 0.98 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.12 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.15 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Almere City | FC Eindhoven |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.39 | 0.42 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 0.61 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.64 | 0.64 |
| Passes per match | 280 | 286 |
| Passes against per match | 373 | 364 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.2 | 17.8 |
| Long balls per match | 37 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Almere City | FC Eindhoven |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 3.6 |
| Corners against per match | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.43 | 0.31 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.53 |
| Other | Almere City | FC Eindhoven |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Wessel Speel (Almere City) | Jort Borgmans (FC Eindhoven) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 25 | 29 |
| Save % | 81% | 60% |
| xG prevented | 76% | 23% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Almere City a 61% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Almere City 61%, draw 21%, FC Eindhoven 18%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.