Eerste Divisie11°14,1 mm28 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Almere CityAlmere CityLow block & direct
    vs
    FC EindhovenFC EindhovenCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Almere City (61%)Best value by the model: Under 1,5 @ 7.30 (+31 %)

    Almere City vs FC Eindhoven · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Almere City 61%X 21%18% FC Eindhoven · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Almere City – FC Eindhoven

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    One issue: xPoints show an edge for Eindhoven (7.5 vs 10.4), which the text omits—this is a notable fact contradicting the narrative of Almere's dominance. Otherwise, all numbers match.

    Corrected text:

    Two teams, Jong Almere City and FC Eindhoven, face off with little to separate them in recent form. A small sample size in head-to-head matchups, which weighs less than the current season dynamics. Jong Almere holds a slight advantage in points with 12 over Eindhoven's 11, but the expected goals (xG) tell a nuanced story. Almere City generates 1.4 xG per match, surpassing Eindhoven's 0.98, yet both defenses leak goals, with Almere City allowing 1.7 xGA compared to Eindhoven's 1.8. Notably, xPoints favor Eindhoven (10.4) over Almere City (7.5), suggesting Eindhoven may be undervalued relative to underlying performance.

    Despite these defensive frailties, the model heavily favors the hosts. Almere City has a 61% chance of victory, with the most likely scorelines pointing to a 2-0 or 2-1 win. When factoring in the expected goals—2.21 for Almere City against a meager 0.90 for the visitors—it's little surprise. Eindhoven's reliance on counter-attacks and crosses will likely struggle against Almere's low defensive line and direct play.

    The high probability of over 2.5 goals at 60% and both teams scoring at 53% underscores a potential for goals, yet the weather forecast of 14.1 mm rain could suppress attacking flair, a factor already considered in the model's numbers. Such nuances make this clash intriguing, with Almere City positioned as the likely victor.

    For bettors, the sharpest angle lies in the market discrepancies. Both Betsafe and Nordicbet offer significant value on the under 1.5 goals at odds of 7.3, where the model estimates an 18% probability—a 31% edge. Given the conditions and defensive profiles, backing under 2.5 goals at 3.15 also presents value, with a 25% edge. In a game where Almere is favored, the under-goal markets provide the most compelling opportunities.

    Almere CityAlmere City
    Form WWLWL
    League ranking xG #11xGA #16xT #8xP/match #16Points #12
    Key players
    • Emanuel PokuFxG 0.13 · xT 0.19
    • Ferdy DruijfFxG 0.70 · xT 0.16
    • Enzo CornelisseCAMxG 0.11 · xT 0.20
    FC EindhovenFC Eindhoven
    Form DWWLD
    League ranking xG #21xGA #17xT #21xP/match #17Points #13
    Key players
    • Guus BeaumontCDMxG 0.09 · xT 0.13
    • Mika de JongeCMxG 0.27 · xT 0.07
    • Rayan BuifrahiCAMxG 0.13 · xT 0.05

    Match prediction: Almere City – FC Eindhoven

    Predicted score matrix

    FC Eindhoven →
    Almere City →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.7%
    0–13.7%
    0–21.8%
    0–30.5%
    0–4+0.1%
    1
    1–09.6%
    1–19.1%
    1–24.0%
    1–31.2%
    1–4+0.3%
    2
    2–010.9%
    2–19.8%
    2–24.4%
    2–31.3%
    2–4+0.4%
    3
    3–08.0%
    3–17.2%
    3–23.3%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–07.4%
    4+–16.7%
    4+–23.0%
    4+–30.9%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.2-011%
    2. 2.2-110%
    3. 3.1-010%
    4. 4.1-19%
    5. 5.3-08%
    Expected goals
    2,21–0,90
    Both teams to score
    53%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,1
    Under 2,540%
    @3.15EV+25%
    Over 2,560%
    @1.35

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Almere City to win61%
    • Over 1.5 goals82%

    Combined probability

    57%

    Fair odds

    1.75

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Almere City to win61%
    • Over 2.5 goals60%
    • Ferdy Druijf to score33%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score53%
    • Over 2.5 goals60%
    • Ferdy Druijf to score33%
    • Guus Beaumont to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 1.518% probability@7.30BetsafeEV+31%reference odds
    • Under 1.518% probability@7.30NordicbetEV+31%reference odds
    • Under 2.540% probability@3.15BetsafeEV+25%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Almere CityX2 · FC Eindhoven
    Betsafe1.434.55
    EV+ 16%
    6.30
    LeoVegas1.424.70
    EV+ 6%
    5.75
    Nordicbet1.434.55
    EV+ 16%
    6.30

    Odds updated 4 Oct, 13:35

    Odds movement

    1-1 %
    67 %62 %

    1.44 → 1.42

    X-2 %
    22 %17 %

    4.80 → 4.70

    2+6 %
    19 %14 %

    5.40 → 5.75

    Over 2,5+3 %
    72 %67 %

    1.31 → 1.35

    LeoVegas · 3 recorded price levels · 03/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Almere City
    FC Eindhoven
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Almere City (13–6)
    FC Eindhoven (15–19)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Almere City
    James Lawrence: 218 passningar, xT 0.34LawrenceJoey Jacobs: 211 passningar, xT 0.59JacobsTeun Bijleveld: 152 passningar, xT 0.35BijleveldWessel Speel: 123 passningar, xT 0.19SpeelMarley Dors: 103 passningar, xT 0.81DorsEnzo Cornelisse: 101 passningar, xT 1.03CornelisseMartin Jean Wasinski: 98 passningar, xT 0.23WasinskiMees Hoedemakers: 89 passningar, xT 0.09HoedemakersEmmanuel van de Blaak: 56 passningar, xT 0.07BlaakEmanuel Poku: 51 passningar, xT 0.8PokuHamza El Dahri: 46 passningar, xT 0.22Dahri
    FC Eindhoven
    Guus Beaumont: 188 passningar, xT 0.55BeaumontJunior Poortvliet: 158 passningar, xT 0.17PoortvlietOwen Renfrum: 132 passningar, xT 0RenfrumJort Borgmans: 132 passningar, xT 0.23BorgmansRaf Van De Riet: 129 passningar, xT 0.49RietXander Blomme: 93 passningar, xT 0.13BlommeLuc Netten: 88 passningar, xT 0.03NettenRayan Buifrahi: 78 passningar, xT 0.14BuifrahiHyman Ali: 64 passningar, xT 0.01AliSiegert Baartmans: 63 passningar, xT -0.25BaartmansHugo Deenen: 53 passningar, xT 0.05Deenen
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Almere City
    James Lawrence: 218 passningar, xT 0.34LawrenceJoey Jacobs: 211 passningar, xT 0.59JacobsTeun Bijleveld: 152 passningar, xT 0.35BijleveldWessel Speel: 123 passningar, xT 0.19SpeelMarley Dors: 103 passningar, xT 0.81DorsEnzo Cornelisse: 101 passningar, xT 1.03CornelisseMartin Jean Wasinski: 98 passningar, xT 0.23WasinskiMees Hoedemakers: 89 passningar, xT 0.09HoedemakersEmmanuel van de Blaak: 56 passningar, xT 0.07BlaakEmanuel Poku: 51 passningar, xT 0.8PokuHamza El Dahri: 46 passningar, xT 0.22Dahri
    FC Eindhoven
    Guus Beaumont: 188 passningar, xT 0.55BeaumontJunior Poortvliet: 158 passningar, xT 0.17PoortvlietOwen Renfrum: 132 passningar, xT 0RenfrumJort Borgmans: 132 passningar, xT 0.23BorgmansRaf Van De Riet: 129 passningar, xT 0.49RietXander Blomme: 93 passningar, xT 0.13BlommeLuc Netten: 88 passningar, xT 0.03NettenRayan Buifrahi: 78 passningar, xT 0.14BuifrahiHyman Ali: 64 passningar, xT 0.01AliSiegert Baartmans: 63 passningar, xT -0.25BaartmansHugo Deenen: 53 passningar, xT 0.05Deenen

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceAlmere CityFC Eindhoven
    Points1211
    xPoints7.510.4
    xG per match1.40.98
    xGA per match1.71.8
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.20.12
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.150.21
    Playing styleAlmere CityFC Eindhoven
    Build-up efficiency0.320.3
    Field tilt0.390.42
    xT per match1.20.61
    xTA per match1.41.2
    Won balls, offensive half2227
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.280.32
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.220.26
    Entries into the box per match1210
    Entries into the box against1615
    Pass completion %0.710.69
    Pass completion % under pressure0.640.64
    Passes per match280286
    Passes against per match373364
    Switches of play per match24.217.8
    Long balls per match3733
    Set piecesAlmere CityFC Eindhoven
    xG from free kicks0.040.06
    Corners per match4.73.6
    Corners against per match6.56.4
    xG per corner0.050.03
    xGA per corner against0.020.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.430.31
    First touch, defensive corners %0.510.53
    OtherAlmere CityFC Eindhoven
    Throw-in control0.710.72
    The goalkeepersWessel Speel (Almere City)Jort Borgmans (FC Eindhoven)
    Saves2529
    Save %81%60%
    xG prevented76%23%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Almere City vs FC Eindhoven according to our model?

    The model gives Almere City a 61% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Almere City 61%, draw 21%, FC Eindhoven 18%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.