Eerste Divisie11°14,1 mm28 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Jong AZJong AZPossession control
    5–4
    Helmond SportHelmond SportPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Jong AZ (54%)

    Jong AZ vs Helmond Sport · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Jong AZ 54%X 21%24% Helmond Sport · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 5–4. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Jong AZ vs Helmond Sport (Eerste Divisie, Friday, 23 October 2026): Jong AZ win 54%, draw 21%, Helmond Sport win 24%. Expected goals (xG): Jong AZ 2.22, Helmond Sport 1.39. Most likely score: 2-1 (9%). Over 2.5 goals 70%, both teams to score 67%. Double chance: Jong AZ or draw 76%, Helmond Sport or draw 46%. Prediction updated Thursday, 15 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Jong AZ – Helmond Sport

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    The odds figure "1.85" is not supported by the given facts and appears fabricated.

    CORRECTED TEXT:

    The central question for Jong AZ versus Helmond Sport is whether the hosts can translate their statistical edge into a decisive victory despite recent head-to-head struggles. The model gives Jong AZ a clear edge with a 54% win probability, but their past encounters with Helmond present a troubling narrative: Jong AZ has lost three out of their four matchups since 2023. While this small sample should not overshadow the broader analysis, it does introduce an element of doubt.

    Jong AZ's advantage is clear in most metrics. They lead not just in points but also in expected goals (xG) and expected points (xPoints), suggesting a more consistent performance level. With an xG of 2.22 for the upcoming match, they seem well-positioned to find the back of the net multiple times. Helmond Sport, by contrast, has an xG of 1.39, indicating their attack might struggle to match the hosts' firepower.

    However, both teams employ a possession-based style, which might lead to a more tactical battle in the midfield. Yet, the forecasted rain could potentially disrupt this rhythm, leading to unpredictable shifts in momentum. Despite this, the model still leans towards a high-scoring encounter, with a 70% probability of over 2.5 goals and a 67% chance both teams will score.

    The projected scorelines of 2-1 and 3-1 underline Jong AZ's statistical superiority. They seem poised to exploit Helmond's defensive vulnerabilities, as indicated by their higher xG per match. Still, bettors should be cautious about the potential for rain to complicate matters, though this is accounted for in the model's predictions.

    Given their statistical dominance and Helmond's recent struggles, Jong AZ presents a promising case for the discerning bettor.

    Jong AZJong AZ
    Form LDWLD
    League ranking xG #9xGA #8xT #9xP/match #9Points #10
    Key players
    • Julian OeripCAMxG 0.21 · xT 0.12
    • Jesper ZwartRBxG 0.04 · xT 0.12
    • Ayoub OufkirFxG 0.52 · xT 0.24
    Helmond SportHelmond Sport
    Form LLDLL
    League ranking xG #17xGA #14xT #20xP/match #11Points #18
    Key players
    • Mauro LenaertsFxG 0.62 · xT 0.02
    • Livio CiceroFxG 0.24 · xT 0.15
    • Xander Jan Van der VeldeLWxG 0.03 · xT 0.09
    Final score
    5 – 4
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Jong AZ 54% · Draw 21% · Helmond Sport 24%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - Helmond SportBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 7,58fair 10,68-29 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Jong AZ – Helmond Sport

    Predicted score matrix

    Helmond Sport →
    Jong AZ →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–03.0%
    0–13.5%
    0–22.6%
    0–31.2%
    0–4+0.6%
    1
    1–05.8%
    1–18.6%
    1–25.8%
    1–32.7%
    1–4+1.3%
    2
    2–06.7%
    2–19.3%
    2–26.4%
    2–33.0%
    2–4+1.4%
    3
    3–04.9%
    3–16.9%
    3–24.8%
    3–32.2%
    3–4+1.0%
    4+
    4+–04.6%
    4+–16.4%
    4+–24.4%
    4+–32.1%
    4+–4+1.0%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.2-19%
    2. 2.1-19%
    3. 3.3-17%
    4. 4.2-07%
    5. 5.2-26%
    Expected goals
    2,22–1,39
    Both teams to score
    67%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,6
    Under 2,530%
    @2.82
    Over 2,570%
    @1.41

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Jong AZ to win54%
    • Over 1.5 goals88%

    Combined probability

    50%

    Fair odds

    2.00

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Jong AZ to win54%
    • Over 2.5 goals70%
    • Julian Miles Oerip to score26%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score67%
    • Over 2.5 goals70%
    • Julian Miles Oerip to score26%
    • Julian Sijbrands to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Jong AZ54% probability@1.90LeoVegasEV+3%reference odds
    • 1 · Jong AZ54% probability@1.85BetsafeEV+0%reference odds
    • 1 · Jong AZ54% probability@1.85NordicbetEV+0%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Jong AZX2 · Helmond Sport
    Betsafe
    EV+ 0%
    1.85
    3.853.55
    LeoVegas
    EV+ 3%
    1.90
    3.853.40
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 0%
    1.85
    3.853.55

    Odds updated 23 Oct, 13:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Helmond Sport win since 16 October — the odds have shortened from 4.20 to 3.40 (−19%).

    1+19 %
    58 %48 %

    1.60 → 1.90

    X-12 %
    27 %17 %

    4.40 → 3.85

    2-19 %
    30 %20 %

    4.20 → 3.40

    Over 2,5+5 %
    72 %62 %

    1.33 → 1.40

    LeoVegas · 24 recorded price levels · 16/10/2026 → 23/10/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Jong AZ 1Draw 0Helmond Sport 3
    Goals: 7–9 (⌀ 4)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Jong AZ
    Helmond Sport
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Jong AZ (26–22)
    Helmond Sport (16–21)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Jong AZ
    Julian Oerip: 195 passningar, xT 0.27OeripAndrea Natali: 190 passningar, xT 0.4NataliJesper Zwart: 181 passningar, xT 0.69ZwartFrej Elkjær Andersen: 142 passningar, xT 0.22AndersenRio Robbemond: 117 passningar, xT 0.17RobbemondKiani Inge: 115 passningar, xT 0.01IngeHessel de Wit: 94 passningar, xT 0.3WitJulian Sijbrands: 80 passningar, xT 0.08SijbrandsKiyani Zeggen: 78 passningar, xT 0.15ZeggenRion Ichihara: 66 passningar, xT 0.17IchiharaJerolldino Bergraaf: 55 passningar, xT 0.26Bergraaf
    Helmond Sport
    Brian Koglin: 243 passningar, xT 0.43KoglinXander Jan Van der Velde: 183 passningar, xT 0.42VeldeMichel Ludwig: 183 passningar, xT 0.13LudwigThomas Poll: 180 passningar, xT 0.67PollTijn Landheer: 180 passningar, xT 0.1LandheerSem Dekkers: 164 passningar, xT 0.89DekkersMenno Bergsen: 154 passningar, xT 0.11BergsenLivio Cicero: 66 passningar, xT -0.02CiceroJoep van der Sluijs: 66 passningar, xT 0.15SluijsFlor Van Den Eynden: 55 passningar, xT 0.19EyndenPol Llonch: 55 passningar, xT 0.03Llonch
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Jong AZ
    Julian Oerip: 195 passningar, xT 0.27OeripAndrea Natali: 190 passningar, xT 0.4NataliJesper Zwart: 181 passningar, xT 0.69ZwartFrej Elkjær Andersen: 142 passningar, xT 0.22AndersenRio Robbemond: 117 passningar, xT 0.17RobbemondKiani Inge: 115 passningar, xT 0.01IngeHessel de Wit: 94 passningar, xT 0.3WitJulian Sijbrands: 80 passningar, xT 0.08SijbrandsKiyani Zeggen: 78 passningar, xT 0.15ZeggenRion Ichihara: 66 passningar, xT 0.17IchiharaJerolldino Bergraaf: 55 passningar, xT 0.26Bergraaf
    Helmond Sport
    Brian Koglin: 243 passningar, xT 0.43KoglinXander Jan Van der Velde: 183 passningar, xT 0.42VeldeMichel Ludwig: 183 passningar, xT 0.13LudwigThomas Poll: 180 passningar, xT 0.67PollTijn Landheer: 180 passningar, xT 0.1LandheerSem Dekkers: 164 passningar, xT 0.89DekkersMenno Bergsen: 154 passningar, xT 0.11BergsenLivio Cicero: 66 passningar, xT -0.02CiceroJoep van der Sluijs: 66 passningar, xT 0.15SluijsFlor Van Den Eynden: 55 passningar, xT 0.19EyndenPol Llonch: 55 passningar, xT 0.03Llonch

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceJong AZHelmond Sport
    Points149
    xPoints15.214.8
    xG per match1.61.2
    xGA per match1.51.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.220.15
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.210.21
    Playing styleJong AZHelmond Sport
    Build-up efficiency0.320.29
    Field tilt0.540.38
    xT per match1.10.88
    xTA per match1.11.2
    Won balls, offensive half2321
    Pressing intensity0.220.24
    Pressing efficiency0.270.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.20.22
    Entries into the box per match1910
    Entries into the box against1216
    Pass completion %0.770.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.66
    Passes per match373317
    Passes against per match361408
    Switches of play per match23.225.2
    Long balls per match4333
    Set piecesJong AZHelmond Sport
    xG from free kicks0.020.06
    Corners per match53.8
    Corners against per match5.16.1
    xG per corner0.010.03
    xGA per corner against0.050.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.530.4
    First touch, defensive corners %0.560.39
    OtherJong AZHelmond Sport
    Throw-in control0.80.72
    The goalkeepersKiyani Zeggen (Jong AZ)Menno Bergsen (Helmond Sport)
    Saves2049
    Save %63%71%
    xG prevented40%51%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Jong AZ vs Helmond Sport according to our model?

    The model gives Jong AZ a 54% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Jong AZ 54%, draw 21%, Helmond Sport 24%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 9% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 70% and under at 30%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 67% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Jong AZ vs Helmond Sport?

    The model expects 2.22 goals (xG) for Jong AZ and 1.39 for Helmond Sport, 3.61 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Jong AZ or draw (1X) 76%, Helmond Sport or draw (X2) 46% and no draw (12) 79%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.