01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Jong PSV or draw (X2)64%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
Eerste Divisie11°21,6 mm43 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for FC Eindhoven vs Jong PSV (Eerste Divisie, Friday, 23 October 2026): FC Eindhoven win 35%, draw 25%, Jong PSV win 40%. Expected goals (xG): FC Eindhoven 1.60, Jong PSV 1.72. Most likely score: 1-1 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 65%, both teams to score 66%. Double chance: FC Eindhoven or draw 60%, Jong PSV or draw 65%. Prediction updated Thursday, 15 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT: Possession control meets high press as FC Eindhoven hosts Jong PSV in a clash that promises to test both teams' tactical flexibility. While Eindhoven has dominated the head-to-head record since 2023 with four wins in as many matches, this small sample size doesn't overshadow the visitors' superior form and underlying numbers this season. With Jong PSV claiming an edge in points, expected points, and expected goals, the visitors come into this match as slight favorites.
The expected goals model tilts towards PSV U21, forecasting a narrow lead with 1.72 xG compared to the home side's 1.60. This difference mirrors the visitors' ability to generate more goal-scoring opportunities, a critical factor when the elements — 14.2 mm of rain expected — could dampen overall goal-scoring efficiency. However, the damp conditions and Eindhoven's possession game might limit the visitors' high press, creating an intriguing tactical battle where patience could outweigh aggression.
Despite the visitors' statistical edge, Eindhoven's knack for exploiting mistakes, as evidenced by their clean sweep in recent encounters, can't be dismissed. Yet, with both teams averaging over 1.5 xGA per match, defensive reliability is questionable. The model suggests a 65% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 66% likelihood of both teams finding the net, emphasizing the probability of an open contest.
The betting landscape reveals tangible value on the visitors. Jong PSV's win at odds of 2.65 with bookmakers like Betsafe, LeoVegas, and Nordicbet offers a 7% edge according to the model's 40% win probability. While head-to-head history favors Eindhoven, it appears the scales are tipping towards Jong PSV this time around, particularly with the model's most likely scoreline being a tight 1-1. The value on offer is notable, and those siding with the high-pressing visitors will find this the sharpest angle to consider.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · FC Eindhoven | X | 2 · Jong PSV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.32 | 3.60 | EV+ 7% 2.65 |
| LeoVegas | 2.35 | 3.65 | EV+ 5% 2.60 |
| Nordicbet | 2.32 | 3.60 | EV+ 7% 2.65 |
Odds updated 23 Oct, 08:36
2.12 → 2.35
3.80 → 3.65
2.80 → 2.60
LeoVegas · 22 recorded price levels · 18/10/2026 → 23/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | FC Eindhoven | Jong PSV |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11 | 13 |
| xPoints | 12.2 | 14.4 |
| xG per match | 0.89 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Playing style | FC Eindhoven | Jong PSV |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.45 | 0.55 |
| xT per match | 0.63 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 300 | 422 |
| Passes against per match | 350 | 318 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.6 | 25.9 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 39 |
| Set pieces | FC Eindhoven | Jong PSV |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 3.4 | 5 |
| Corners against per match | 6.2 | 5.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.27 | 0.53 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.54 | 0.62 |
| Other | FC Eindhoven | Jong PSV |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| The goalkeepers | Jort Borgmans (FC Eindhoven) | Khadim Ngom (Jong PSV) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 34 | 18 |
| Save % | 60% | 72% |
| xG prevented | 35% | 57% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Jong PSV a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: FC Eindhoven 35%, draw 25%, Jong PSV 40%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 65% and under at 35%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 66% according to the model.
The model expects 1.60 goals (xG) for FC Eindhoven and 1.72 for Jong PSV, 3.33 in total.
FC Eindhoven or draw (1X) 60%, Jong PSV or draw (X2) 65% and no draw (12) 75%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.