01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Volendam to win67%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Eerste Divisie11°20,0 mm37 km/h
Läs på svenska
VolendamPossession controlFinal score 6–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Volendam vs Jong Utrecht (Eerste Divisie, Friday, 23 October 2026): Volendam win 67%, draw 19%, Jong Utrecht win 13%. Expected goals (xG): Volendam 2.27, Jong Utrecht 0.95. Most likely score: 2-0 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 62%, both teams to score 55%. Double chance: Volendam or draw 87%, Jong Utrecht or draw 33%. Prediction updated Thursday, 15 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Volendam's control-oriented playing style is set to dominate against a struggling Jong Utrecht side, who have lost their last three matches. The home team’s strategy of holding possession and dictating the tempo plays into their impressive record, winning 83% of home matches across 24 contests. This evening's matchup leans heavily in favor of the hosts, not just in terms of tactics but also in the likely outcome, with the model giving them a 67% chance of victory.
The expected goals tell a clear story: Volendam are predicted to score 2.27 goals compared to Utrecht U21's 0.95. This is further supported by Volendam’s superior xG of 1.8 per match, while the visitors lag behind at 1.2. Utrecht's defensive woes are highlighted by their xGA of 1.8, which suggests they will struggle to contain the home side’s attacking prowess. The rain might dampen the pitch, but the forecasted 9.8 mm is already factored into the model's calculations, keeping Volendam's edge intact.
The head-to-head record since 2023 is limited, with only two encounters, both won by Volendam. While this sample size is small and less informative than current form and xG data, it still nods to the home team's dominance. The draw has a modest 19% chance, but the visitors' recent form suggests they are unlikely to disrupt Volendam’s rhythm. Common scoreline predictions like 2-0 and 2-1, each at 10%, reinforce the anticipated control by the hosts.
For those considering a bet, there is value in backing Volendam at odds of 1.615 with LeoVegas, offering a 9% edge according to the model. Betsafe and Nordicbet also present an 8% edge at odds of 1.6. With over 2.5 goals sitting at a 62% probability, a high-scoring affair in favor of Volendam is where the smart money lies.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Volendam | X | 2 · Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 11% 1.65 | 4.15 | 4.25 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 15% 1.70 | 4.10 | 4.00 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 11% 1.65 | 4.15 | 4.25 |
Odds updated 23 Oct, 12:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Jong Utrecht win since 18 October — the odds have shortened from 4.75 to 4.00 (−16%).
1.52 → 1.70
4.50 → 4.10
4.75 → 4.00
LeoVegas · 23 recorded price levels · 18/10/2026 → 23/10/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Volendam | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 16 | 7 |
| xPoints | 14.9 | 12.3 |
| xG per match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.31 | 0.22 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.21 | 0.35 |
| Playing style | Volendam | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.4 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.97 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 367 | 285 |
| Passes against per match | 327 | 366 |
| Switches of play per match | 27.7 | 23.2 |
| Long balls per match | 38 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Volendam | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.32 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 3.9 | 4.4 |
| Corners against per match | 7.2 | 6.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.31 | 0.38 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| Other | Volendam | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.8 | 0.78 |
| The goalkeepers | Hidde Jurjus (Volendam) | Mees Eppink (Jong Utrecht) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 28 | 23 |
| Save % | 78% | 61% |
| xG prevented | 52% | 44% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Volendam a 67% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Volendam 67%, draw 19%, Jong Utrecht 13%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The model expects 2.27 goals (xG) for Volendam and 0.95 for Jong Utrecht, 3.22 in total.
Volendam or draw (1X) 87%, Jong Utrecht or draw (X2) 33% and no draw (12) 81%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.