01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Vitesse or draw (1X)65%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Eerste Divisie16°9 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Vitesse's slight edge in expected goals per match, 2.1 to NAC Breda's 1.9, highlights their offensive potency. The model gives the hosts a 39% chance of winning, slightly outstripping Breda's 36%, supported by their 1.62 expected goals compared to the visitors’ 1.50. Despite the close probabilities, Vitesse's more direct style may exploit any lapses in NAC's high pressing game.
The most likely scorelines suggest a tight affair, with a 1-1 draw at 11% leading the projections, followed by a 2-1 home win at 9% and a 1-2 away victory at 8%. The high probability of both teams scoring (63%) aligns well with these expectations, indicating a match where defences could be breached. With a projected over 2.5 goals at 60%, the indicators lean towards a match featuring multiple goals, despite neither team's defensive record being particularly concerning.
From a betting perspective, considering William Hill offers Vitesse at enticing odds of 2.55, this presents a potential value play given Vitesse's edge in both xG and xPoints. While the model leans towards the hosts, the close nature of the matchup makes any outright prediction less than certain. A 2-1 victory for Vitesse seems the most pragmatic call in this finely balanced contest.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Vitesse | X | 2 · NAC Breda |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 8% 2.75 | 3.60 | 2.22 |
| Betsson | EV+ 8% 2.75 | 3.60 | 2.22 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 8% 2.75 | 3.60 | 2.22 |
Odds updated 26 Sept, 20:35
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Vitesse | NAC Breda |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 13 | 10 |
| xPoints | 12.8 | 9.2 |
| xG per match | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Vitesse | NAC Breda |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.56 | 0.68 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 31 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.33 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 16 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 334 | 407 |
| Passes against per match | 339 | 271 |
| Switches of play per match | 31.9 | 28.5 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 43 |
| Set pieces | Vitesse | NAC Breda |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.12 |
| Corners per match | 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.6 | 2.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.25 | 0.4 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.66 | 0.61 |
| Other | Vitesse | NAC Breda |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.79 |
| The goalkeepers | Connor van den Berg (Vitesse) | Michael Robin Verrips (NAC Breda) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 18 | 19 |
| Save % | 82% | 58% |
| xG prevented | 87% | 44% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Vitesse a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Vitesse 39%, draw 25%, NAC Breda 36%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.