Eerste Divisie14°1,2 mm5 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    VVV-VenloVVV-VenloCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    RodaRodaPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Roda (40%)

    VVV-Venlo vs Roda · Eerste Divisie

    1 · VVV-Venlo 34%X 26%40% Roda · 2

    Bet on this match

    BetssonFå ett 250 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4!Claim the bonus at Betsson
    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: VVV-Venlo – Roda

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Roda JC Kerkrade's recent form has been nothing short of impressive, with a six-match unbeaten streak in the league underscoring their momentum. Their possession-based style contrasts sharply with VVV-Venlo's more reactive, counter-attacking approach, setting up a strategic battle that could sway the match in both tactical and psychological terms.

    The model gives a slight edge to Roda with a 40% chance of winning, compared to VVV's 34%. Notably, Roda's expected goals against (xGA) of 1.2 per match suggests a more robust defensive setup than the hosts, who have conceded a worrying 1.9 xGA per match. This tilt towards a steadier defensive performance could be crucial, especially since VVV have scored in eight consecutive league matches, indicating their attacking threat.

    However, the head-to-head record since 2023 tells a different story, albeit from a small sample size of four games: VVV have two wins and two draws, remaining unbeaten. Yet, it's the expected points (xPoints) where Roda finds an advantage, suggesting their underlying play has been more effective, even if it hasn't always translated into points on the board.

    With both teams exhibiting a tendency to find the net — a 65% probability of both teams scoring — and a 63% lean towards over 2.5 goals, this match appears ripe for goals. Roda’s slight edge in the model and their unbeaten streak make them an attractive selection, particularly given VVV's leaky defense despite their attacking prowess.

    Anticipate a closely contested affair, with a 2-1 victory for Roda JC Kerkrade as a plausible outcome, though the 1-1 most likely scoreline should not be discounted. The over on 2.5 goals seems a reasonable bet considering the attacking tendencies and defensive vulnerabilities on display.

    VVV-VenloVVV-Venlo
    Form WWLWW
    League ranking xG #9xGA #18xT #14xP/match #13Points #2
    Key players
    • Dean ZandbergenFxG 0.35 · xT 0.00
    • Edhy Yvan ZulianiRWxG 0.20 · xT 0.30
    • Nassim Ait MouhouLWxG 0.33 · xT 0.08
    RodaRoda
    Form WDDWD
    League ranking xG #13xGA #3xT #16xP/match #3Points #8
    Key players
    • Lucas BeertenCBxG 0.11 · xT 0.09
    • Mitchel PaulissenRWxG 0.08 · xT 0.08
    • Koen JansenLWBxG 0.01 · xT 0.22

    Match prediction: VVV-Venlo – Roda

    Predicted score matrix

    Roda →
    VVV-Venlo →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.2%
    0–16.1%
    0–25.4%
    0–33.0%
    0–4+1.8%
    1
    1–05.8%
    1–110.5%
    1–28.5%
    1–34.7%
    1–4+2.9%
    2
    2–04.8%
    2–18.1%
    2–26.8%
    2–33.8%
    2–4+2.3%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–14.3%
    3–23.6%
    3–32.0%
    3–4+1.2%
    4+
    4+–01.4%
    4+–12.4%
    4+–22.0%
    4+–31.1%
    4+–4+0.7%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.2-18%
    4. 4.2-27%
    5. 5.0-16%
    Expected goals
    1,58–1,67
    Both teams to score
    65%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,3
    Under 2,537%
    –
    Over 2,563%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Roda or draw (X2)64%
    • Over 1.5 goals84%

    Combined probability

    54%

    Fair odds

    1.87

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Roda or draw (X2)64%
    • Over 2.5 goals63%
    • Anthony Edsel Johannes van den Hurk to score28%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score65%
    • Over 2.5 goals63%
    • Anthony Edsel Johannes van den Hurk to score28%
    • Lucas Beerten to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    VVV-Venlo 2Draw 2Roda 0
    Goals: 10–5 (⌀ 3,8)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • VVV Venlo have scored in 8 consecutive league matches.
    • Roda JC Kerkrade are unbeaten in their last 6 league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    VVV-Venlo
    Roda
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    VVV-Venlo (19–11)
    Roda (7–5)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    VVV-Venlo
    Éanna Clancy: 249 passningar, xT 0.3ClancyYouri Schoonderwaldt: 223 passningar, xT 0.35SchoonderwaldtLars de Blok: 185 passningar, xT 1.04BlokGabin Blancquart: 165 passningar, xT -0.06BlancquartRaf Vullers: 145 passningar, xT -0.01VullersTristan Schenkhuizen: 127 passningar, xT -0.04SchenkhuizenEdhy Yvan Zuliani: 103 passningar, xT 1.05ZulianiLuis Gorlich: 82 passningar, xT 0.32GorlichMohammed Odriss: 76 passningar, xT 0.4OdrissNassim Ait Mouhou: 68 passningar, xT 0.35MouhouIsmail Oulad M'Hand: 37 passningar, xT 0.43M'Hand
    Roda
    Lucas Beerten: 222 passningar, xT 0.52BeertenJustin Treichel: 211 passningar, xT 0.05TreichelMarco Tol: 199 passningar, xT 0.26TolKoen Jansen: 178 passningar, xT 0.41JansenDyon Dorenbosch: 151 passningar, xT 0.44DorenboschJoshua Nisbet: 149 passningar, xT 0.2NisbetDario Van den Buijs: 93 passningar, xT 0.08BuijsJeremiah Dennit Mensah: 76 passningar, xT 0.1MensahMitchel Paulissen: 72 passningar, xT 0.04PaulissenGuilherme Martinho Peixoto: 70 passningar, xT 0.26PeixotoJérôme Déom: 70 passningar, xT 0.12Déom
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    VVV-Venlo
    Éanna Clancy: 249 passningar, xT 0.3ClancyYouri Schoonderwaldt: 223 passningar, xT 0.35SchoonderwaldtLars de Blok: 185 passningar, xT 1.04BlokGabin Blancquart: 165 passningar, xT -0.06BlancquartRaf Vullers: 145 passningar, xT -0.01VullersTristan Schenkhuizen: 127 passningar, xT -0.04SchenkhuizenEdhy Yvan Zuliani: 103 passningar, xT 1.05ZulianiLuis Gorlich: 82 passningar, xT 0.32GorlichMohammed Odriss: 76 passningar, xT 0.4OdrissNassim Ait Mouhou: 68 passningar, xT 0.35MouhouIsmail Oulad M'Hand: 37 passningar, xT 0.43M'Hand
    Roda
    Lucas Beerten: 222 passningar, xT 0.52BeertenJustin Treichel: 211 passningar, xT 0.05TreichelMarco Tol: 199 passningar, xT 0.26TolKoen Jansen: 178 passningar, xT 0.41JansenDyon Dorenbosch: 151 passningar, xT 0.44DorenboschJoshua Nisbet: 149 passningar, xT 0.2NisbetDario Van den Buijs: 93 passningar, xT 0.08BuijsJeremiah Dennit Mensah: 76 passningar, xT 0.1MensahMitchel Paulissen: 72 passningar, xT 0.04PaulissenGuilherme Martinho Peixoto: 70 passningar, xT 0.26PeixotoJérôme Déom: 70 passningar, xT 0.12Déom

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceVVV-VenloRoda
    Points1512
    xPoints9.511.1
    xG per match1.61.4
    xGA per match1.91.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.170.17
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.310.11
    Playing styleVVV-VenloRoda
    Build-up efficiency0.30.3
    Field tilt0.40.41
    xT per match11
    xTA per match1.71.1
    Won balls, offensive half2224
    Pressing intensity0.230.22
    Pressing efficiency0.30.3
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.220.26
    Entries into the box per match1212
    Entries into the box against1413
    Pass completion %0.730.76
    Pass completion % under pressure0.660.71
    Passes per match302354
    Passes against per match368356
    Switches of play per match24.120.6
    Long balls per match3632
    Set piecesVVV-VenloRoda
    xG from free kicks0.040.05
    Corners per match4.54.3
    Corners against per match5.53.7
    xG per corner0.020.04
    xGA per corner against0.030.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.410.4
    First touch, defensive corners %0.770.58
    OtherVVV-VenloRoda
    Throw-in control0.670.72
    The goalkeepersYouri Schoonderwaldt (VVV-Venlo)Justin Treichel (Roda)
    Saves2426
    Save %69%87%
    xG prevented30%75%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins VVV-Venlo vs Roda according to our model?

    The model gives Roda a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: VVV-Venlo 34%, draw 26%, Roda 40%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.