01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Go Ahead Eagles to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
EredivisieMAC3PARK Stadion, Zwolle10°2,5 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 4–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for PEC Zwolle vs Go Ahead Eagles (Eredivisie, Sunday, 18 October 2026): PEC Zwolle win 28%, draw 24%, Go Ahead Eagles win 48%. Expected goals (xG): PEC Zwolle 1.19, Go Ahead Eagles 1.94. Most likely score: 1-1 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 60%, both teams to score 60%. Double chance: PEC Zwolle or draw 52%, Go Ahead Eagles or draw 72%. Prediction updated Saturday, 10 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The crucial question for PEC Zwolle vs Go Ahead Eagles is whether Zwolle can halt their three-game losing streak against a side that has consistently outperformed them. With a model probability giving Go Ahead Eagles a 48% chance of victory, the numbers favor the visitors. They also boast a more potent attack, having scored in 11 consecutive league matches while Zwolle has struggled defensively.
The head-to-head record, albeit a small sample of six matches, leans heavily towards the visitors, with Go Ahead Eagles winning two and drawing four. This streak underscores their historical edge, but it's the current form and expected goals that truly stack the odds against Zwolle. With Zwolle generating only 0.94 xG per match compared to Go Ahead Eagles' 1.6, the hosts' offensive struggles are evident, compounded by their xGA of 2.1 per game—a glaring defensive vulnerability.
Go Ahead Eagles' style of counter-attacking and leveraging crosses aligns perfectly against Zwolle's low defensive setup. This tactical mismatch suggests that the visitors are well-positioned to exploit Zwolle's weaknesses. The model's most likely scorelines, pegging a 1-1 or 1-2 outcome, further underline the challenge facing Zwolle in this encounter.
While the over 2.5 goals is marked at 60%, there's intriguing value in the under 2.5 goals market. With LeoVegas offering odds of 2.65 and the model rating the likelihood at 40%, there's a tangible 5% edge. Similarly, Betsafe's odds of 2.63 present a 4% edge, making this a promising angle for those skeptical of a high-scoring affair.
In conclusion, Go Ahead Eagles appear primed to extend their dominance, with a 1-2 victory over Zwolle looking like the most probable outcome. However, the under 2.5 goals market offers the sharpest betting edge, challenging the assumption of a goal-filled match.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · PEC Zwolle | X | 2 · Go Ahead Eagles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 1% 3.64 | 3.81 | 1.88 |
| LeoVegas | 3.60 | 4.00 | 1.92 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 1% 3.64 | 3.81 | 1.88 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 3% 3.73 | 4.01 | 1.91 |
Odds updated 18 Oct, 12:16
3.66 → 3.73
3.68 → 4.01
1.96 → 1.91
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 16/10/2026 → 18/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eredivisie data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | PEC Zwolle | Go Ahead Eagles |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 11 |
| xPoints | 7.8 | 10.2 |
| xG per match | 0.94 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.41 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | PEC Zwolle | Go Ahead Eagles |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.32 | 0.54 |
| xT per match | 0.62 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 271 | 416 |
| Passes against per match | 442 | 344 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.3 | 33.8 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 42 |
| Set pieces | PEC Zwolle | Go Ahead Eagles |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 4.2 | 6.4 |
| Corners against per match | 7.3 | 4.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.32 | 0.53 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.68 |
| Other | PEC Zwolle | Go Ahead Eagles |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| The goalkeepers | Jasper Schendelaar (PEC Zwolle) | Christian Kjetil Haug (Go Ahead Eagles) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 35 | 23 |
| Save % | 65% | 57% |
| xG prevented | 46% | 35% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Go Ahead Eagles a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: PEC Zwolle 28%, draw 24%, Go Ahead Eagles 48%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The model expects 1.19 goals (xG) for PEC Zwolle and 1.94 for Go Ahead Eagles, 3.13 in total.
PEC Zwolle or draw (1X) 52%, Go Ahead Eagles or draw (X2) 72% and no draw (12) 76%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.