01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Birmingham City or draw (1X)67%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
EFL ChampionshipSt Andrew's, Birmingham8°14 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers (EFL Championship, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Birmingham City win 42%, draw 30%, Queens Park Rangers win 28%. Expected goals (xG): Birmingham City 1.41, Queens Park Rangers 1.25. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 50%, both teams to score 54%. Double chance: Birmingham City or draw 72%, Queens Park Rangers or draw 58%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
A small head-to-head sample since 2023 shows one win each for Birmingham City and Queens Park Rangers, offering a split that leans more towards the realm of historical curiosity than predictive certainty. With only two encounters, this data lacks the depth to override the current form and the more granular expected goals (xG) metrics. Birmingham City's recent knack for finding the back of the net in 8 consecutive league matches adds an intriguing dynamic to this fixture, particularly against a QPR side that emphasizes possession and a high press.
The model gives the Brummies a 42% probability of taking three points, yet the draw at 30% lingers as a significant possibility, backed by a 13% chance of a 1-1 scoreline. Expected goals figures slightly favor the hosts, showing a 1.41 to 1.25 edge. Despite these nuances, both teams might find themselves in a tight contest where defenses could play a starring role. Each side has a slight vulnerability, as indicated by their xGA per match, but QPR seems marginally better at applying pressure after losing possession.
Birmingham's playstyle, capitalizing on counter-attacks and crosses, might clash interestingly with QPR's high press. Given Birmingham's ability to score consistently, they could exploit any lapse in the visitors' pressing game. However, the statistical edges that favor QPR in expected goals from quick transitions suggest they might find opportunities on the break. The model suggests an even 50% chance for an over/under on 2.5 goals, indicating a balanced affair that could tilt either way.
For those seeking a value bet, the draw at odds of 3.45 with LeoVegas offers a 4% edge over the model's valuation. While Birmingham's home edge and scoring streak present a narrative of possibility, the statistical equilibrium makes the stalemate an attractive proposition in a clash likely to be decided by the finest of margins.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Birmingham City | X | 2 · Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|---|
| LeoVegas | 1.98 | EV+ 4% 3.45 | 3.55 |
Odds updated 11 Oct, 16:36
1.95 → 1.98
3.45 → 3.45
3.55 → 3.55
LeoVegas · 2 recorded price levels · 10/10/2026 → 11/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Birmingham City | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 14 | 14 |
| xPoints | 13.8 | 14.3 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.17 | 0.3 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.1 |
| Playing style | Birmingham City | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.51 | 0.52 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.93 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.65 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 259 | 373 |
| Passes against per match | 300 | 401 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.7 | 28.1 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Birmingham City | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 3.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.74 |
| Other | Birmingham City | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | James Beadle (Birmingham City) | Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 25 | 24 |
| Save % | 69% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 49% | 70% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Birmingham City a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Birmingham City 42%, draw 30%, Queens Park Rangers 28%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The model expects 1.41 goals (xG) for Birmingham City and 1.25 for Queens Park Rangers, 2.66 in total.
Birmingham City or draw (1X) 72%, Queens Park Rangers or draw (X2) 58% and no draw (12) 70%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.