EFL ChampionshipSt Andrew's, Birmingham8°14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Birmingham CityBirmingham CityCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    Queens Park RangersQueens Park RangersPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 1 · Birmingham City (42%)Best value by the model: X · Draw @ 3.45 (+4 %)

    Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers · EFL Championship

    1 · Birmingham City 42%X 30%28% Queens Park Rangers · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers (EFL Championship, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Birmingham City win 42%, draw 30%, Queens Park Rangers win 28%. Expected goals (xG): Birmingham City 1.41, Queens Park Rangers 1.25. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 50%, both teams to score 54%. Double chance: Birmingham City or draw 72%, Queens Park Rangers or draw 58%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Birmingham City – Queens Park Rangers

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    A small head-to-head sample since 2023 shows one win each for Birmingham City and Queens Park Rangers, offering a split that leans more towards the realm of historical curiosity than predictive certainty. With only two encounters, this data lacks the depth to override the current form and the more granular expected goals (xG) metrics. Birmingham City's recent knack for finding the back of the net in 8 consecutive league matches adds an intriguing dynamic to this fixture, particularly against a QPR side that emphasizes possession and a high press.

    The model gives the Brummies a 42% probability of taking three points, yet the draw at 30% lingers as a significant possibility, backed by a 13% chance of a 1-1 scoreline. Expected goals figures slightly favor the hosts, showing a 1.41 to 1.25 edge. Despite these nuances, both teams might find themselves in a tight contest where defenses could play a starring role. Each side has a slight vulnerability, as indicated by their xGA per match, but QPR seems marginally better at applying pressure after losing possession.

    Birmingham's playstyle, capitalizing on counter-attacks and crosses, might clash interestingly with QPR's high press. Given Birmingham's ability to score consistently, they could exploit any lapse in the visitors' pressing game. However, the statistical edges that favor QPR in expected goals from quick transitions suggest they might find opportunities on the break. The model suggests an even 50% chance for an over/under on 2.5 goals, indicating a balanced affair that could tilt either way.

    For those seeking a value bet, the draw at odds of 3.45 with LeoVegas offers a 4% edge over the model's valuation. While Birmingham's home edge and scoring streak present a narrative of possibility, the statistical equilibrium makes the stalemate an attractive proposition in a clash likely to be decided by the finest of margins.

    Birmingham CityBirmingham City
    Form DLWDW
    League ranking xG #10xGA #12xT #4xP/match #8Points #8
    Key players
    • Christoph KlarerCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.05
    • Tomoki IwataCMxG 0.10 · xT 0.09
    • Jhon SolísCMxG 0.07 · xT 0.04
    Queens Park RangersQueens Park Rangers
    Form LDDDD
    League ranking xG #9xGA #6xT #5xP/match #5Points #7
    Key players
    • Alfie LloydFxG 0.40 · xT -0.01
    • Jimmy DunneCBxG 0.07 · xT 0.03
    • Ilias ChairLWxG 0.54 · xT 0.34

    Match prediction: Birmingham City – Queens Park Rangers

    Predicted score matrix

    Queens Park Rangers →
    Birmingham City →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.3%
    0–18.4%
    0–25.5%
    0–32.3%
    0–4+0.9%
    1
    1–09.5%
    1–112.7%
    1–27.7%
    1–33.2%
    1–4+1.3%
    2
    2–06.9%
    2–18.7%
    2–25.4%
    2–32.3%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–03.3%
    3–14.1%
    3–22.6%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.6%
    4+–12.0%
    4+–21.2%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-09%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.0-18%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,41–1,25
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    –
    Over 2,550%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Birmingham City or draw (1X)67%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    48%

    Fair odds

    2.07

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Birmingham City or draw (1X)67%
    • Under 2.5 goals50%
    • Carlos Vicente Robles to score29%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Carlos Vicente Robles to score29%
    • Kealey Otieno Adamson to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • X · Draw30% probability@3.45LeoVegasEV+4%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Birmingham CityX2 · Queens Park Rangers
    LeoVegas1.98
    EV+ 4%
    3.45
    3.55

    Odds updated 11 Oct, 16:36

    Odds movement

    1+1 %
    50 %45 %

    1.95 → 1.98

    X0 %
    29 %24 %

    3.45 → 3.45

    20 %
    29 %24 %

    3.55 → 3.55

    LeoVegas · 2 recorded price levels · 10/10/2026 → 11/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Birmingham City 1Draw 0Queens Park Rangers 1
    Goals: 2–2 (⌀ 2)

    Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Birmingham City have scored in 8 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Birmingham City
    Queens Park Rangers
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Birmingham City (13–11)
    Queens Park Rangers (11–8)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Birmingham City
    Christoph Klarer: 175 passningar, xT 0.1KlarerTomoki Iwata: 157 passningar, xT 0.57IwataBright Osayi-Samuel: 154 passningar, xT 0.49Osayi-SamuelAlexander William Cochrane: 138 passningar, xT 0.35CochranePhil Yannik Neumann: 122 passningar, xT 0.84NeumannLiam Millar: 111 passningar, xT 1.05MillarJames Beadle: 81 passningar, xT 0.32BeadleJhon Solís: 70 passningar, xT 0.09SolísSeung-Ho Paik: 70 passningar, xT 0.52PaikCarlos Vicente Robles: 69 passningar, xT 0.14RoblesJay Stansfield: 48 passningar, xT 0.7Stansfield
    Queens Park Rangers
    Ronnie Edwards: 270 passningar, xT 0.19EdwardsNicolas Madsen: 220 passningar, xT 0.54MadsenJimmy Dunne: 202 passningar, xT 0.35DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 201 passningar, xT 0.23CharlesGlen Adjei Kamara: 194 passningar, xT 0.41KamaraJake Clarke Salter: 158 passningar, xT 0.2SalterKealey Otieno Adamson: 130 passningar, xT 0.6AdamsonAmadou Salif Mbengue: 99 passningar, xT 0.16MbengueDennis Cirkin: 93 passningar, xT 0.58CirkinHarvey Vale: 89 passningar, xT 0.28ValePaul Smyth: 71 passningar, xT 0.58Smyth
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Birmingham City
    Christoph Klarer: 175 passningar, xT 0.1KlarerTomoki Iwata: 157 passningar, xT 0.57IwataBright Osayi-Samuel: 154 passningar, xT 0.49Osayi-SamuelAlexander William Cochrane: 138 passningar, xT 0.35CochranePhil Yannik Neumann: 122 passningar, xT 0.84NeumannLiam Millar: 111 passningar, xT 1.05MillarJames Beadle: 81 passningar, xT 0.32BeadleJhon Solís: 70 passningar, xT 0.09SolísSeung-Ho Paik: 70 passningar, xT 0.52PaikCarlos Vicente Robles: 69 passningar, xT 0.14RoblesJay Stansfield: 48 passningar, xT 0.7Stansfield
    Queens Park Rangers
    Ronnie Edwards: 270 passningar, xT 0.19EdwardsNicolas Madsen: 220 passningar, xT 0.54MadsenJimmy Dunne: 202 passningar, xT 0.35DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 201 passningar, xT 0.23CharlesGlen Adjei Kamara: 194 passningar, xT 0.41KamaraJake Clarke Salter: 158 passningar, xT 0.2SalterKealey Otieno Adamson: 130 passningar, xT 0.6AdamsonAmadou Salif Mbengue: 99 passningar, xT 0.16MbengueDennis Cirkin: 93 passningar, xT 0.58CirkinHarvey Vale: 89 passningar, xT 0.28ValePaul Smyth: 71 passningar, xT 0.58Smyth

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceBirmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
    Points1414
    xPoints13.814.3
    xG per match1.61.6
    xGA per match1.31.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.170.3
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.230.1
    Playing styleBirmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
    Build-up efficiency0.330.3
    Field tilt0.510.52
    xT per match1.11.1
    xTA per match0.931
    Won balls, offensive half2721
    Pressing intensity0.240.25
    Pressing efficiency0.330.25
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.310.22
    Entries into the box per match1315
    Entries into the box against1111
    Pass completion %0.650.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.620.74
    Passes per match259373
    Passes against per match300401
    Switches of play per match18.728.1
    Long balls per match2732
    Set piecesBirmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
    xG from free kicks0.090.05
    Corners per match6.36.1
    Corners against per match4.73.9
    xG per corner0.050.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.450.44
    First touch, defensive corners %0.580.74
    OtherBirmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
    Throw-in control0.680.7
    The goalkeepersJames Beadle (Birmingham City)Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers)
    Saves2524
    Save %69%75%
    xG prevented49%70%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers according to our model?

    The model gives Birmingham City a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Birmingham City 42%, draw 30%, Queens Park Rangers 28%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?

    The model expects 1.41 goals (xG) for Birmingham City and 1.25 for Queens Park Rangers, 2.66 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Birmingham City or draw (1X) 72%, Queens Park Rangers or draw (X2) 58% and no draw (12) 70%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.