EFL League TwoWham Stadium, Accrington7°16 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Accrington StanleyAccrington StanleyLow block & direct
    3–1
    GillinghamGillinghamLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Accrington Stanley (48%)

    Accrington Stanley vs Gillingham · EFL League Two

    1 · Accrington Stanley 48%X 28%24% Gillingham · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 3–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Accrington Stanley vs Gillingham (EFL League Two, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Accrington Stanley win 48%, draw 28%, Gillingham win 24%. Expected goals (xG): Accrington Stanley 1.43, Gillingham 1.01. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 44%, both teams to score 49%. Double chance: Accrington Stanley or draw 76%, Gillingham or draw 52%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Accrington Stanley – Gillingham

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    The expected goals tell a compelling story: Accrington Stanley edges out Gillingham with 1.43 versus 1.01, suggesting the hosts hold a slight upper hand in this clash. Despite trailing in points, Accrington's xPoints advantage at 15.6 against the visitors' 14.1 highlights a potential underperformance on their part, indicating room for positive regression.

    The low defensive profiles and direct styles of both squads may result in a cagey affair, as evidenced by a modest 44% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 49% likelihood of both teams finding the net. The most likely scorelines further reinforce the narrative of a tight contest, with 1-1 and 1-0 leading the probabilities. A small sample from their head-to-head encounters shows parity, with each side claiming a win and two draws. Thus, form and expected goals take precedence over past meetings.

    The home side's slight favoritism is backed by the model's 48% win probability, offering value with bookmakers. LeoVegas provides the best edge, offering odds of 2.35, translating to a 12% advantage over the model's estimation. For those inclined to back Accrington, this bet stands as the sharpest play, focusing on stability over speculative high-risk wagers.

    Accrington StanleyAccrington Stanley
    Form LDDWD
    League ranking xG #7xGA #16xT #8xP/match #6Points #15
    Key players
    • Donald LoveCAMxG 0.02 · xT 0.23
    • Charlie CatonFxG 0.56 · xT 0.03
    • Shaun WhalleyCAMxG 0.14 · xT 0.12
    GillinghamGillingham
    Form WWLDW
    League ranking xG #17xGA #15xT #18xP/match #9Points #4
    Key players
    • Omar Jerome BecklesCBxG 0.09 · xT 0.03
    • Ronan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman HaleLWxG 0.29 · xT 0.00
    • James Robert BrophyLWxG 0.10 · xT 0.08
    Final score
    3 – 1
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Accrington Stanley 48% · Draw 28% · Gillingham 24%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - AccringtonBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 7,95fair 10,10-21 %
    Hit
    Matchresultat - GillinghamBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 11,15fair 19,89-44 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Accrington Stanley – Gillingham

    Predicted score matrix

    Gillingham →
    Accrington Stanley →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.1%
    0–18.5%
    0–24.5%
    0–31.5%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–012.1%
    1–113.0%
    1–26.4%
    1–32.1%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–08.9%
    2–19.0%
    2–24.5%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–04.2%
    3–14.3%
    3–22.2%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–02.1%
    4+–12.1%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.0-09%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.2-09%
    Expected goals
    1,43–1,01
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,556%
    @1.83EV+2%
    Over 2,544%
    @2.02

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Accrington Stanley to win48%
    • Under 3.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    34%

    Fair odds

    2.92

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Accrington Stanley to win48%
    • Under 2.5 goals56%
    • Josh Stanley Ronald Woods to score23%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals44%
    • Josh Stanley Ronald Woods to score23%
    • Armani George Little to be booked17%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Accrington Stanley48% probability@2.30LeoVegasEV+10%reference odds
    • 1 · Accrington Stanley48% probability@2.26PinnacleEV+8%reference odds
    • 1 · Accrington Stanley48% probability@2.22BetsafeEV+6%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Accrington StanleyX2 · Gillingham
    Betsafe
    EV+ 6%
    2.22
    3.303.05
    LeoVegas
    EV+ 10%
    2.30
    3.302.95
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 6%
    2.22
    3.303.05
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 8%
    2.26
    EV+ 2%
    3.62
    3.04

    Odds updated 17 Oct, 12:16

    Odds movement

    1-3 %
    44 %39 %

    2.32 → 2.26

    X+3 %
    29 %24 %

    3.53 → 3.62

    2+6 %
    35 %30 %

    2.86 → 3.04

    Over 2,5+1 %
    50 %45 %

    2.00 → 2.02

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Accrington Stanley 1Draw 2Gillingham 1
    Goals: 4–5 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Accrington Stanley
    Gillingham
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Accrington Stanley (13–14)
    Gillingham (15–10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Accrington Stanley
    Joseph William Anderson: 156 passningar, xT 1.1AndersonDonald Love: 126 passningar, xT 0.64LoveSeamus Conneely: 113 passningar, xT 0.07ConneelyDavid Mabanga Tutonda: 107 passningar, xT 0.25TutondaLouie Moulden: 96 passningar, xT 0.38MouldenConnor David O'Brien: 92 passningar, xT 0.36O'BrienDevon Matthews: 79 passningar, xT 0.36MatthewsLiam Coyle: 67 passningar, xT 0.07CoyleStefan Edouard Mols: 51 passningar, xT 0.34MolsTyler Walton: 44 passningar, xT 0.15WaltonJosh Stanley Ronald Woods: 39 passningar, xT 0.2Woods
    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 185 passningar, xT 0.11BecklesLogan Dobbs: 157 passningar, xT 0.19DobbsOliver Lennon George Wright: 144 passningar, xT 0.14WrightJames Robert Brophy: 143 passningar, xT 0.36BrophyNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 136 passningar, xT 0.52FreemanAndy Smith: 131 passningar, xT 0.13SmithRobbie Mckenzie: 91 passningar, xT -0.01MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 62 passningar, xT 0.28HaleEli Josef King: 55 passningar, xT 0.13KingHarry Waldock: 47 passningar, xT 0.32WaldockGarath James McCleary: 45 passningar, xT 0.16McCleary
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Accrington Stanley
    Joseph William Anderson: 156 passningar, xT 1.1AndersonDonald Love: 126 passningar, xT 0.64LoveSeamus Conneely: 113 passningar, xT 0.07ConneelyDavid Mabanga Tutonda: 107 passningar, xT 0.25TutondaLouie Moulden: 96 passningar, xT 0.38MouldenConnor David O'Brien: 92 passningar, xT 0.36O'BrienDevon Matthews: 79 passningar, xT 0.36MatthewsLiam Coyle: 67 passningar, xT 0.07CoyleStefan Edouard Mols: 51 passningar, xT 0.34MolsTyler Walton: 44 passningar, xT 0.15WaltonJosh Stanley Ronald Woods: 39 passningar, xT 0.2Woods
    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 185 passningar, xT 0.11BecklesLogan Dobbs: 157 passningar, xT 0.19DobbsOliver Lennon George Wright: 144 passningar, xT 0.14WrightJames Robert Brophy: 143 passningar, xT 0.36BrophyNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 136 passningar, xT 0.52FreemanAndy Smith: 131 passningar, xT 0.13SmithRobbie Mckenzie: 91 passningar, xT -0.01MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 62 passningar, xT 0.28HaleEli Josef King: 55 passningar, xT 0.13KingHarry Waldock: 47 passningar, xT 0.32WaldockGarath James McCleary: 45 passningar, xT 0.16McCleary

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceAccrington StanleyGillingham
    Points1116
    xPoints15.614.1
    xG per match1.41.1
    xGA per match1.31.3
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.420.31
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.350.19
    Playing styleAccrington StanleyGillingham
    Build-up efficiency0.320.33
    Field tilt0.460.41
    xT per match0.990.71
    xTA per match0.860.92
    Won balls, offensive half2822
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.390.33
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.350.32
    Entries into the box per match127
    Entries into the box against1213
    Pass completion %0.60.64
    Pass completion % under pressure0.580.58
    Passes per match218250
    Passes against per match266321
    Switches of play per match18.917.6
    Long balls per match3530
    Set piecesAccrington StanleyGillingham
    xG from free kicks0.050.06
    Corners per match4.83.4
    Corners against per match4.95.1
    xG per corner0.020.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.41
    First touch, defensive corners %0.760.62
    OtherAccrington StanleyGillingham
    Throw-in control0.690.74
    The goalkeepersLouie Moulden (Accrington Stanley)Oliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham)
    Saves2927
    Save %71%87%
    xG prevented51%87%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Accrington Stanley vs Gillingham according to our model?

    The model gives Accrington Stanley a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Accrington Stanley 48%, draw 28%, Gillingham 24%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Accrington Stanley vs Gillingham?

    The model expects 1.43 goals (xG) for Accrington Stanley and 1.01 for Gillingham, 2.43 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Accrington Stanley or draw (1X) 76%, Gillingham or draw (X2) 52% and no draw (12) 72%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.