01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Accrington Stanley to win48%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL League TwoWham Stadium, Accrington7°16 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 3–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Accrington Stanley vs Gillingham (EFL League Two, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Accrington Stanley win 48%, draw 28%, Gillingham win 24%. Expected goals (xG): Accrington Stanley 1.43, Gillingham 1.01. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 44%, both teams to score 49%. Double chance: Accrington Stanley or draw 76%, Gillingham or draw 52%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The expected goals tell a compelling story: Accrington Stanley edges out Gillingham with 1.43 versus 1.01, suggesting the hosts hold a slight upper hand in this clash. Despite trailing in points, Accrington's xPoints advantage at 15.6 against the visitors' 14.1 highlights a potential underperformance on their part, indicating room for positive regression.
The low defensive profiles and direct styles of both squads may result in a cagey affair, as evidenced by a modest 44% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 49% likelihood of both teams finding the net. The most likely scorelines further reinforce the narrative of a tight contest, with 1-1 and 1-0 leading the probabilities. A small sample from their head-to-head encounters shows parity, with each side claiming a win and two draws. Thus, form and expected goals take precedence over past meetings.
The home side's slight favoritism is backed by the model's 48% win probability, offering value with bookmakers. LeoVegas provides the best edge, offering odds of 2.35, translating to a 12% advantage over the model's estimation. For those inclined to back Accrington, this bet stands as the sharpest play, focusing on stability over speculative high-risk wagers.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Accrington Stanley | X | 2 · Gillingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 6% 2.22 | 3.30 | 3.05 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 10% 2.30 | 3.30 | 2.95 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 6% 2.22 | 3.30 | 3.05 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 8% 2.26 | EV+ 2% 3.62 | 3.04 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 12:16
2.32 → 2.26
3.53 → 3.62
2.86 → 3.04
2.00 → 2.02
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Accrington Stanley | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11 | 16 |
| xPoints | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.42 | 0.31 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Accrington Stanley | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.46 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 0.99 | 0.71 |
| xTA per match | 0.86 | 0.92 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.39 | 0.33 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.35 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.6 | 0.64 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.58 | 0.58 |
| Passes per match | 218 | 250 |
| Passes against per match | 266 | 321 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.9 | 17.6 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Accrington Stanley | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 4.8 | 3.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 5.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.76 | 0.62 |
| Other | Accrington Stanley | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| The goalkeepers | Louie Moulden (Accrington Stanley) | Oliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 29 | 27 |
| Save % | 71% | 87% |
| xG prevented | 51% | 87% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Accrington Stanley a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Accrington Stanley 48%, draw 28%, Gillingham 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The model expects 1.43 goals (xG) for Accrington Stanley and 1.01 for Gillingham, 2.43 in total.
Accrington Stanley or draw (1X) 76%, Gillingham or draw (X2) 52% and no draw (12) 72%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.