EFL League TwoHighbury Stadium, Fleetwood10°17 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood TownPossession control
    2–0
    Rotherham UnitedRotherham UnitedPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Fleetwood Town (43%)Best value by the model: Under 1,5 @ 3.55 (+18 %)

    Fleetwood Town vs Rotherham United · EFL League Two

    1 · Fleetwood Town 43%X 28%29% Rotherham United · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 2–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Fleetwood Town vs Rotherham United (EFL League Two, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Fleetwood Town win 43%, draw 28%, Rotherham United win 29%. Expected goals (xG): Fleetwood Town 1.28, Rotherham United 1.00. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 40%, both teams to score 46%. Double chance: Fleetwood Town or draw 71%, Rotherham United or draw 57%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Fleetwood Town – Rotherham United

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    The clash between Fleetwood Town and Rotherham United is poised to be a tight affair, with both teams displaying similar possession-based playing styles. The numbers suggest a close encounter, with Fleetwood slightly favored at a 43% win probability. Rotherham isn't far behind, standing at 29%, while the draw remains a tangible possibility at 28%.

    Fleetwood's slight edge in points (11 to Rotherham's 10) contrasts with Rotherham's superior expected points (xPoints) of 14.0 compared to the hosts' 11.2. This suggests that Rotherham has underperformed relative to their underlying metrics, hinting at potential for improvement. Both teams average over one expected goal per match, but Fleetwood concedes more, with an xGA of 1.5 against Rotherham's 1.2.

    Given the statistical landscape, the most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 1-0 in favor of Fleetwood both sit at 13%. A low-scoring draw or a narrow victory for either side seems to be on the cards. The probability of seeing more than 2.5 goals is only 40%, with both teams to score standing at 46%. This aligns with the expectations for a controlled, perhaps cautious game between two possession-oriented sides.

    For bettors, the value lies in the unders. The odds for under 0.5 goals at 12.0 with both Betsafe and Nordicbet deliver a 27% edge, given the model's rating of 11%. For those seeking a slightly safer option, the under 1.5 market at 3.55 with Betsafe offers an 18% edge, rated at 33% by the model. While a goalless draw is always a bold call, the numbers suggest that this matchup could easily be defined by defensive solidity rather than attacking flair.

    Fleetwood TownFleetwood Town
    Form DLLLD
    League ranking xG #19xGA #19xT #6xP/match #22Points #16
    Key players
    • Harrison NealCDMxG 0.05 · xT 0.09
    • Shaun RooneyCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.10
    • Mark HelmCAMxG 0.13 · xT 0.15
    Rotherham UnitedRotherham United
    Form DWDLL
    League ranking xG #16xGA #9xT #20xP/match #10Points #20
    Key players
    • Paul Philip MullinFxG 0.40 · xT 0.02
    • Josh AusterfieldCMxG 0.09 · xT 0.09
    • Dominic IorfaCBxG 0.01 · xT 0.03
    Final score
    2 – 0
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Fleetwood Town 43% · Draw 28% · Rotherham United 29%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - FleetwoodBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 7,11fair 12,61-44 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - RotherhamBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 10,59fair 20,61-49 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Fleetwood Town – Rotherham United

    Predicted score matrix

    Rotherham United →
    Fleetwood Town →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–010.6%
    0–19.8%
    0–25.1%
    0–31.7%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–012.7%
    1–113.5%
    1–26.5%
    1–32.2%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–08.4%
    2–18.4%
    2–24.2%
    2–31.4%
    2–4+0.4%
    3
    3–03.6%
    3–13.6%
    3–21.8%
    3–30.6%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.5%
    4+–11.5%
    4+–20.8%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-013%
    3. 3.0-011%
    4. 4.0-110%
    5. 5.2-08%
    Expected goals
    1,28–1,00
    Both teams to score
    46%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,3
    Under 2,560%
    @1.94EV+13%
    Over 2,540%
    @1.89

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Fleetwood Town or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 3.5 goals80%

    Combined probability

    57%

    Fair odds

    1.75

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Fleetwood Town or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 2.5 goals60%
    • Chedwyn Michael Evans to score25%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score46%
    • Over 2.5 goals40%
    • Chedwyn Michael Evans to score25%
    • Ossama Wassim Ashley to be booked18%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 1.533% probability@3.55BetsafeEV+18%reference odds
    • Under 1.533% probability@3.55NordicbetEV+18%reference odds
    • Under 2.560% probability@1.94PinnacleEV+17%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Fleetwood TownX2 · Rotherham United
    Betsafe2.123.303.25
    LeoVegas2.153.403.10
    Nordicbet2.123.303.25
    Pinnacle2.24
    EV+ 2%
    3.65
    3.06

    Odds updated 17 Oct, 12:37

    Odds movement

    1+1 %
    45 %40 %

    2.22 → 2.24

    X+3 %
    29 %24 %

    3.56 → 3.65

    2+2 %
    34 %29 %

    3.00 → 3.06

    Over 2,5+1 %
    53 %48 %

    1.87 → 1.89

    Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Fleetwood Town
    Rotherham United
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Fleetwood Town (10–11)
    Rotherham United (12–16)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 191 passningar, xT 0.63NealFinley Potter: 178 passningar, xT 0.42PotterShaun Rooney: 150 passningar, xT 0.37RooneyMark Helm: 103 passningar, xT 0.84HelmLewis McCann: 102 passningar, xT 0.66McCannJay Lynch: 83 passningar, xT 0.24LynchRhys Bennett: 70 passningar, xT -0.01BennettJake Thomas Batty: 58 passningar, xT 0.09BattyAdam Murphy: 54 passningar, xT 0.08MurphyRaffaele Cirino: 47 passningar, xT 0.35CirinoChedwyn Michael Evans: 41 passningar, xT 0.06Evans
    Rotherham United
    Sonny Aljofree: 242 passningar, xT 0.45AljofreeDenzel Hall: 169 passningar, xT 0.52HallDominic Iorfa: 152 passningar, xT 0.09IorfaJosh Austerfield: 127 passningar, xT 0.36AusterfieldOssama Wassim Ashley: 121 passningar, xT 0.19AshleyKieran Ngwenya: 120 passningar, xT 0.15NgwenyaJulian Ryan Eyestone: 116 passningar, xT 0.15EyestoneBrandon Ashley Cover: 71 passningar, xT 0.17CoverEwan Otoo: 64 passningar, xT 0.31OtooJili Buyabu: 61 passningar, xT 0BuyabuPaul Philip Mullin: 50 passningar, xT -0.07Mullin
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 191 passningar, xT 0.63NealFinley Potter: 178 passningar, xT 0.42PotterShaun Rooney: 150 passningar, xT 0.37RooneyMark Helm: 103 passningar, xT 0.84HelmLewis McCann: 102 passningar, xT 0.66McCannJay Lynch: 83 passningar, xT 0.24LynchRhys Bennett: 70 passningar, xT -0.01BennettJake Thomas Batty: 58 passningar, xT 0.09BattyAdam Murphy: 54 passningar, xT 0.08MurphyRaffaele Cirino: 47 passningar, xT 0.35CirinoChedwyn Michael Evans: 41 passningar, xT 0.06Evans
    Rotherham United
    Sonny Aljofree: 242 passningar, xT 0.45AljofreeDenzel Hall: 169 passningar, xT 0.52HallDominic Iorfa: 152 passningar, xT 0.09IorfaJosh Austerfield: 127 passningar, xT 0.36AusterfieldOssama Wassim Ashley: 121 passningar, xT 0.19AshleyKieran Ngwenya: 120 passningar, xT 0.15NgwenyaJulian Ryan Eyestone: 116 passningar, xT 0.15EyestoneBrandon Ashley Cover: 71 passningar, xT 0.17CoverEwan Otoo: 64 passningar, xT 0.31OtooJili Buyabu: 61 passningar, xT 0BuyabuPaul Philip Mullin: 50 passningar, xT -0.07Mullin

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceFleetwood TownRotherham United
    Points1110
    xPoints11.214
    xG per match1.11.2
    xGA per match1.51.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.140.16
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.160.18
    Playing styleFleetwood TownRotherham United
    Build-up efficiency0.340.35
    Field tilt0.510.52
    xT per match10.68
    xTA per match0.940.76
    Won balls, offensive half2926
    Pressing intensity0.220.22
    Pressing efficiency0.370.4
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.380.38
    Entries into the box per match1310
    Entries into the box against1011
    Pass completion %0.640.66
    Pass completion % under pressure0.630.66
    Passes per match272290
    Passes against per match271265
    Switches of play per match16.621.4
    Long balls per match2928
    Set piecesFleetwood TownRotherham United
    xG from free kicks0.080.03
    Corners per match53.6
    Corners against per match5.34.5
    xG per corner0.030.01
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.380.23
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.59
    OtherFleetwood TownRotherham United
    Throw-in control0.690.75
    The goalkeepersJay Lynch (Fleetwood Town)Ted Cann (Rotherham United)
    Saves2312
    Save %68%63%
    xG prevented40%39%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Fleetwood Town vs Rotherham United according to our model?

    The model gives Fleetwood Town a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Fleetwood Town 43%, draw 28%, Rotherham United 29%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 40% and under at 60%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 46% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Fleetwood Town vs Rotherham United?

    The model expects 1.28 goals (xG) for Fleetwood Town and 1.00 for Rotherham United, 2.28 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Fleetwood Town or draw (1X) 71%, Rotherham United or draw (X2) 57% and no draw (12) 72%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.