01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Crewe Alexandra to win47%
- Under 3.5 goals73%
EFL League TwoGresty Road, Crewe8°15 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 3–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Crewe Alexandra vs Rochdale (EFL League Two, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Crewe Alexandra win 47%, draw 28%, Rochdale win 24%. Expected goals (xG): Crewe Alexandra 1.59, Rochdale 1.05. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 49%, both teams to score 52%. Double chance: Crewe Alexandra or draw 76%, Rochdale or draw 53%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
TEXT: Crewe Alexandra's unbeaten run of 11 league matches underscores their recent dominance and sets the stage for their clash against Rochdale. The hosts' ability to maintain possession and control the game's tempo is a significant factor in their recent success. With model probabilities favoring Crewe at 47% to secure a win, their tactical approach seems to provide the edge over the visitors.
Rochdale, though unbeaten in their last five games, lag behind in key metrics. Their xPoints of 9.5 and xG of 0.88 per match highlight a gap in performance compared to Crewe's stronger numbers. The visitors also concede a higher xGA of 1.5 per match, which could be problematic against a team that is adept at dictating play and creating opportunities.
The expected goals suggest a likely edge for Crewe with 1.59 to Rochdale's 1.05, hinting at a potential victory for the hosts. Even though both teams favor possession control, Crewe's superior execution in both attack and defense provides them with a clearer path to capitalizing on any opportunities that arise. The most probable scorelines, 1-1 and 1-0, reflect this edge, albeit with a hint of caution related to Rochdale's resilience.
Despite the tightness of the contest, the data leans towards a slightly lower-scoring affair, with the over 2.5 goals scenario sitting just below the halfway mark at 49%. The "both teams to score" market is marginally more likely at 52%, but the numbers suggest that Crewe Alexandra might edge this one out with a narrow victory, most likely 1-0 or 2-1.
For bettors, the model's insights point to a tactical, data-driven match where Crewe Alexandra's superior underlying numbers make them the more likely side to come out on top, particularly in tight, low-scoring scenarios like 1-0 or 2-1.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Crewe Alexandra | X | 2 · Rochdale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.85 | 3.45 | 3.95 |
| Nordicbet | 1.85 | 3.45 | 3.95 |
| Pinnacle | 1.87 | EV+ 1% 3.56 | EV+ 3% 4.24 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 12:37
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Crewe Alexandra win since 10 October — the odds have shortened from 2.02 to 1.87 (−7%).
2.02 → 1.87
3.49 → 3.56
3.40 → 4.24
1.76 → 1.90
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 10/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Crewe Alexandra | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 18 | 14 |
| xPoints | 15.4 | 9.5 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 0.88 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.3 | 0.07 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.22 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Crewe Alexandra | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.42 |
| xT per match | 0.82 | 0.64 |
| xTA per match | 0.81 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 18 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.34 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 285 | 355 |
| Passes against per match | 304 | 308 |
| Switches of play per match | 25.3 | 20.9 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Crewe Alexandra | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 4.9 | 4.5 |
| Corners against per match | 5 | 5.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.39 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.57 |
| Other | Crewe Alexandra | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Tom Booth (Crewe Alexandra) | Nils Ramming (Rochdale) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 36 | 26 |
| Save % | 84% | 70% |
| xG prevented | 65% | 42% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Crewe Alexandra a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Crewe Alexandra 47%, draw 28%, Rochdale 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.
The model expects 1.59 goals (xG) for Crewe Alexandra and 1.05 for Rochdale, 2.64 in total.
Crewe Alexandra or draw (1X) 76%, Rochdale or draw (X2) 53% and no draw (12) 72%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.