01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Juve Stabia or draw (1X)65%
- Under 3.5 goals73%
Serie BStadio Romeo Menti, Castellammare di Stabia15°9 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Juve Stabia vs Hellas Verona (Serie B, Wednesday, 28 October 2026): Juve Stabia win 38%, draw 25%, Hellas Verona win 36%. Expected goals (xG): Juve Stabia 1.36, Hellas Verona 1.28. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 49%, both teams to score 54%. Double chance: Juve Stabia or draw 64%, Hellas Verona or draw 62%. Prediction updated Monday, 19 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
The text contains an unsupported claim: it repeatedly assumes Juve Stabia is the home team ("hosts," "home side," "home advantage"), but the FACTS do not specify which team is playing at home.
A razor-thin margin separates Juve Stabia and Hellas Verona ahead of their Serie B clash, with the model giving Juve Stabia a slight edge at 38% to Verona's 36%. Despite Juve Stabia's slim lead in points, Verona boasts superior xPoints and a more potent xG rate at 2.1 per match. This offensive firepower suggests Verona might have an edge in creating chances.
The numbers paint a picture of a tightly contested match, likely to hinge on small details. Stabia's physical, balanced approach may disrupt Verona's possession-heavy style, especially if Juve Stabia can capitalize on set pieces or force errors under pressure. The model's most probable outcomes of 1-1, 1-0, and 0-1, each at 9-13%, illustrate just how evenly matched these teams are.
Verona's defense, allowing an xGA of just 1.0 per game, suggests they could stifle Juve Stabia's attack, which only averages 1.4 xG per match. However, Juve Stabia's physicality could challenge Verona's high press, potentially leading to quick transitions and chances on the counter. The balance of power might tilt in favor of whoever can impose their style more effectively on the day.
With a 49% probability for over 2.5 goals and both teams likely to score (54%), goals could come from either side, but not in abundance. The conditions seem ripe for a low-scoring contest, possibly ending in a 1-1 draw, the most favored scoreline. Bettors might look at a nuanced market for value.
For those seeking sharper angles, consider the model's lean towards Juve Stabia. Bookmaker odds may not fully reflect this subtle preference, and a bet on Juve Stabia might offer value if priced attractively. Keep an eye on lines that might underestimate Juve Stabia's edge in this finely poised encounter.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Juve Stabia | X | 2 · Hellas Verona |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 7% 2.80 | 3.20 | 2.35 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 7% 2.80 | 3.25 | 2.35 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 7% 2.80 | 3.20 | 2.35 |
Odds updated 21 Oct, 21:38
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Juve Stabia | Hellas Verona |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 8 |
| xPoints | 10 | 12.7 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.27 | 0.35 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | Juve Stabia | Hellas Verona |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.5 | 0.67 |
| xT per match | 0.73 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 0.64 | 0.78 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 401 | 409 |
| Passes against per match | 303 | 315 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.1 | 29.8 |
| Long balls per match | 23 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Juve Stabia | Hellas Verona |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.1 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 6.5 |
| Corners against per match | 4.1 | 2.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.47 |
| Other | Juve Stabia | Hellas Verona |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.8 |
| The goalkeepers | Pietro Boer (Juve Stabia) | Nicola Leali (Hellas Verona) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 10 |
| Save % | 68% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 66% | 58% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Juve Stabia a 38% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Juve Stabia 38%, draw 25%, Hellas Verona 36%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The model expects 1.36 goals (xG) for Juve Stabia and 1.28 for Hellas Verona, 2.65 in total.
Juve Stabia or draw (1X) 64%, Hellas Verona or draw (X2) 62% and no draw (12) 75%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.